Wowser, I thought I had a good week with three wins but now I find it was four. Nothing gives me greater pleasure than to announce my squid/grunt/doorgunners’ success over the Eeeevil Goliath VA. You Veteran clients don’t realize it but you are one of those statistics that VA keeps track of. A chicken dinner winner (100% or TDIU) occurs exactly 12% of the time at the VARO level. The percentage jumps up to 22% at the BVA and to 74% at the CAVC counting all forms of set aside/reverse/vacate. Even better, when broken down, VA attorneys and the Great Unwashed Agents account for a whopping 35% of wins at the Board level alone. I’m appalled. It should be 100% of the time.
Seriously, folks. I’m just a JohnnyVet myself and new to this claims game but if the claim has merit, you can win it. I look at my early, feeble efforts to fight my own appeals. Like most of you, I foolishly relied on VSOs who couldn’t find their derrieres with a methane detector. It took me 18 years of defeat before the VA Rosetta Stone gave up its secrets to me.
CONGRESSIONAL INFLUENCE
What set this story off was US Congressman Derek Kilmer helping me get my medals 43 years after they were awarded in 2013. In 2015, a close neighbor’s old platoon company got together and helped him get a long-overdue Silver Star. Naturally, Congressman Kilmer (who helped immensely) was there to pin it on him. For reference, a Silver Star is one step below the Medal of Honor. Usually, the Company Commander, a 90-day wonder with slats, is the big winner and the enlisted underlings get a Bronze Star- maybe even one with a “V”. Or an ACM…or nothing
Anyway, Ed was having big problems with his VA claims. Congressman Kilmer called in his chit and asked me to represent Ed. What could I say? Kilmer’s Krewe can prestidigitate NARA records from Vietnam out of thin air in less than a week. That’s an important asset in this day and age of trying to get a Monday Morning Report showing your client present and accounted for at Phu Cat Air Base, RVN 96368 (Binh Dinh) on TDY. Yep. Becoming a member of the Nehmer class is getting that difficult.
Ed didn’t have to worry too much about proving he was in-country. He was a two-year ARPAC idiot like me. He also racked up a BS, a PH, and an Air Medal. Ed was a LRRP. He managed to eat a hand grenade or the better part of one up in I Corps. Army guys like shrapnel scars. It makes them feel tough. Ed’s problem was he had plenty of shrapnel scars but he didn’t have enough ratings to get a TDIU. He was certifiable after two tours in country but 20 years as a LA County Sheriff and Lieutenant really amplified the Bent Brain Syndrome. The bigger problem in my mind was the Ischemic Heart Disease. Ed had the Big One (Myocardial Infarction) back in 2005 and some important muscles died. And, knowing cops, he probably ate his weight in donuts 5,000 times over which didn’t help the coronary artery circus in his chest.
Ed the LRRP circa 1968
Ed the LRRP’s problem was identical to my Ed the Huey Doorgunner who won last week. See https://asknod.org/2019/08/25/phu-hoi-the-128th-aviation-co-assault/. He had the same exact balance of 60% for IHD and 70% for Bent Brain. After I lit the fuse correctly, it was just a matter of time for the win for Ed the doorgunner. We just stirred in a call to the WH hotline to bring it to a boil.
Ed the LRRP went down the exact same road. I patiently guided his PTSD up from 50% to 70%, His IHD had fallen to 30% based on his METS score but he was blowing less than 50% on his Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF). That deserved a 60% rating which I got- but they denied the TDIU. This is Portland VBA 348. They are some kind of hard asses down there. Even the CMA is a dick. It must be depressing with all the Antifa/White Supremacist riots. Why do all these yayhoos have to congregate in the Northwest?
Somehow, the Portland Poobahs had gotten this misguided impression they could deny based only on the IHD. I filed a NOD and pointed out the denial only discussed the IHD disability to the exclusion of any mention of the PTSD rated at 70%. The combination of the two disabilities, in concert, were simply too much to overcome in seeking meaningful employment. That cush job selling Hawaiian timeshare condos for $12,000 a week just wasn’t going to be in Ed the LRRP’s cards during his current incarnation.
Now, we all know about Hart v. Mansfield, 21 Vet App. 505(2007). Hart held that additional development is not permitted “if the purpose was to obtain evidence against the claim,” and further noted that if the evidence was insufficient to make a decision on the claim, then the Secretary was required to obtain a medical examination. Id. at 508 (emphasis added). Well, I guess the folks in Portland never heard of Hart-let alone Messieurs Mariano and Kahana. They already had baskets full of medical evidence and VR&E reports from shrinks saying Ed the LRRP was incorrigible. He enjoyed kicking ass and taking names. The VA “examiner” proceeded to hammer two VES doctors (a shrink and a ARNP gal) to “modify” their diagnoses. Was mitral valve prolapse really part of IHD? Was having a raging anger management problem really an issue to sedentary employment out of the home? This went on for about three months. Then two more. Then another month. Each point where I expected this to bust open, another c&p was scheduled.
Finally, two years later I draw a pair of Eds. Identical ratings. Identical TDIUs. Both started out in my neighborhood and both were in the Army. Ed the LRRP moved down to Oregon which is why his took so long. And two Hepatitis C wins. Same war. Different continents. It ‘s a small world but I’d hate to have to paint it- as a good friend put it once..
My mentor and sensei, who chooses to live in urban Battle Creek, MI sends me humorous stuff on occasion. As he’s a Grunt Vet from the 173rd AB with boots on the ground, I obviously can’t publish everything he sends. This, however, fills the bill. It had me going to the end.
The Cowboy Story
A successful rancher died and left everything to his devoted wife. She was a very good-looking woman and determined to keep the ranch, but knew very little about ranching, so she decided to place an ad in the newspaper for a ranch hand.
Two cowboys applied for the job. One was gay and the other a drunk. She thought long and hard about it, and when no one else applied she decided to hire the gay guy, figuring it would be safer to have him around the house than the drunk.
He proved to be a hard worker who put in long hours every day and knew a lot about ranching.
For weeks, the two of them worked, and the ranch was doing very well.
Then one day, the rancher’s widow said to the hired hand, “You have done a really good job, and the ranch looks great. You should go into town and kick up your heels.” The hired hand readily agreed and went into town one Saturday night.
One o’clock came, however, and he didn’t return. Two o’clock and no hired hand.
Finally he returned around two-thirty, and upon entering the room, he found the rancher’s widow sitting by the fireplace with a glass of wine, waiting for him.
She quietly called him over to her.
“Unbutton my blouse and take it off,” she said.
Trembling, he did as she directed. “Now take off my boots.”
He did as she asked, ever so slowly. “Now take off my socks.”
He removed each gently and placed them neatly by her boots.
“Now take off my skirt.”
He slowly unbuttoned it, constantly watching her eyes in the fire light.
“Now take off my bra..” Again, with trembling hands, he did as he was told and dropped it to the floor.
With a cruel sneer, she looked at him and said, “If you ever wear my clothes into town again, you’re fired!”
Happy Labor Day weekend, campers. Here’s a lovely tale of the impossible. My friend Steve tasked me with my biggest challenge yet in VA claims. Image a triple whammy- no Service Treatment Records, no IMO and a free admission that he had sniffed the white lady in the late eighties. Sounds like the perfect storm for a denial…forever. This is just my cup of tea. The VA didn’t claim the records burnt up at the 4th of July ’73 NPRC barbecue. They just shrugged their shoulders and said “Bummer,dude”. The folks down at VFW and DAV laughed so hard they pee’d their pants…right before they told him to get lost. He finally came to me and asked if it was even worth the paper to file.
Having now survived an airplane mishap, congestive heart failure and Hep C myself, I thought his chances were better than even. The glass is always half full here at asknod. Of course, I was sure I was bulletproof right up until I wasn’t, too. Optimism is a disease. I agreed to file this because I’d want someone with a positive mental attitude to do it for me if the shoe was on the other foot. What the hey? The worst that could happen was a loss.
Steve filed a pro se claim I ghosted for him and predictably lost. The VA examiners were so lazy they just copied and pasted the VAMC Nurse’s pronouncement out of the VistA records. No attempt was made to even paraphrase it. “Hep C infection due to snorting cocaine with shared bloody dollar bill”. One time. Just like that. Boom. I’m surprised they didn’t throw in sharing toilet seats with others in public restrooms post-service as a risk factor as well. That’s pretty flimsy. In NOVAspeak, we call it raw data and conclusions with no supportive rationale.
We had eleven pages of ophthalmological evidence and a few Air Force Personnel records-hardly enough to cobble together anything probative in his favor. Our saving grace is that in the absence of evidence that would normally be there, VA is required to offer a heightened review of everything you do present-such as lay testimony and a heaping helping of 38 USC §1154a. These chowderheads were so sure of themselves they violated about everything related to evaluation of evidence.
I got an abbreviated IMO from our good friend Dr. Bennett Cecil but it did no good. I believe the denial said something smarmy like Dr. Cecil didn’t have the benefit of reviewing the STRS and the entire c-file. Fat chance. I sent him everything or what there was of it. We bided our time and finally got the VA 8 certified to the BVA. I obtained a killer IMO from Mednick Associates and marched into the BVA Travel Board Hearing on March 28th, 2019.
Veterans Law Judge Matthew Blackwelder ushered us in personally and commented off the record that he had reviewed this appeal and we had a better chance of winning the Powerball Lotto with the BIG number. I laid out the case and then flopped the new IMO on the desk. We now had two IMOs to VA’s pathetic copy and paste.
Several weeks before the hearing, Steve belatedly informed me he’d contracted gonorrhea while in Southeast Asia. He hadn’t thought to mention it as he wasn’t aware it was a potential risk factor. I read up on STDs and discovered that they, like Hep C, leave antibodies in your blood forever. I asked to hold the record open for 90 days while I grabbed a blood test to show he still had the antibodies. Judge Blackwelder said that wouldn’t be necessary as he had enough evidence to make a decision. Boy howdy did that let the wind out of my sails. All I could hear was “Fat chance, GI.”
Until last Wednesday. This proves we have a new paradigm afoot at the BVA. No longer are they (VLJs) at the beck and call of the VA Secretary. They actually have become independent thinkers. I was sure we’d be filing our NOA to the Court in short order. Win or Die summarizes this succinctly. God sends the Right.
Here’s the hearing brief and BVA decision for all you wannabe law dogs and pro se folks. Feel free to plagiarize.
It’s all in how you present it to the judge. Of all my wins, this is by far the best. It’s the only one I’ve ever won solely on the strength of the Veteran’s lay testimony . Don’t get me wrong. The IMO was very instrumental in the win but I doubt we would have prevailed without a face-to-face hearing. A picture may be worth a thousand words but a Travel Board hearing is worth a thousand pictures.
First of all, I wish to state that I am a person of color in addition to being an American citizen. I’ve been wanting to say that ever since they reminted the word ‘racist’. Look in the mirror. We are all persons of color. Here’s a cool story about my neighbor, Ed. We knew each other from way back in the 90s long before we finally realized we were both Boots on the Ground brothers. That happened about the time I won 100% in 2008. Today, we welcome Ed into the 100%er’s club. It took far longer than I would have ever expected and the B40 that got things moving was none other than the White House Hotline. Pop a cold one and sit down.
Ed signed up in ’68 and took the 67P20 MOS rotary wing repairman course in AIT. Next stop was Germany. He re-upped after a year and promptly drew a winning ticket and an all expenses paid vacation at Phu Hoi for a year with the 128th Tomahawks. He said one of his high points was flying the old D models. They tried to egress a hot LZ one afternoon with 9 grunts in the back. The Peter pilot pulled hard pitch to get moving and dipped forward a little too much too early. The rotors barely touched the dirt in front but it was too much. They barely made altitude and promptly lost pitch. Ed’s unbroken record of an equal number of takeoffs and landings went down the drain about 30 seconds later… outside the perimeter of the by now very hot LZ. They splatted into the tree canopy and toasted the Huey. Everyone made it to the ground and waited it out with the gooks all around them til the next morning to egress and hitch a ride out.
Phu Hoi Airpatch, RVN
Come on. To a VA rater, an M 60 isn’t really that loud if you have your flight helmet on, right? Wait a minute. Flight helmet? Like in aircrew? Huey jet engine scream? So how did the hearing loss claim fly out the window for the next eighteen years? Remember, Ed’s a combat Veteran. He has an ACM and an Air Medal. §1154b Combat presumption? Anyone? Or Moody and the sympathetic development of his claims?
I met Ed through another fellow who did my dirt work sometime back in the 90s. Unbeknownst to me, Ed began filing in 2001 for what was obvious- PTSD, skin conditions, hearing, headaches, peripheral neuropathy and persistent urinary tract infections. He managed to snag a 30% for Bent brain for a few shekels in 2003. In spite of filing for hearing loss, he kept coming up with a dry hole. Seems like DAV wasn’t up to speed on filing him for bodacious tinnitus. He knew he had it just like we all do except he didn’t get his from an IBM Selectric typewriter while flying a desk. He didn’t have a name for it and VA (and DAV) weren’t going to help him sound it out with Phonics™.
After his heart attack in 2005, he got 60% for IHD. He did all this with little or no help at all. We got together after I began legally helping folks here locally in late 2016. I filed his increase claims for the bent brain, IHD increase and tinnitus on 3/10/2017 and went ahead with a POA ahead of time just to be street legal. VA countered with an increase to 50% for bent brain and 10% for the ear ring …but reduced his IHD back to 30%. It resulted in a push- he stayed at 70% but it pretty much screwed up any chance of TDIU. I think that was their plan from the outset.
This “file and get reduced” game is a classic VA scare tactic. Most Vets- and most certainly their VSO representatives-always shit in their shoes when Vets go up for increases that put them in range of TDIU. They’ll even tell you how VA will take it all away from you if you get greedy. My guess is his own rep. probably told the VA rater they could get away with it. I’ve seen them argue against their client’s best interests more than once.
This is where we took off the nice guy gloves. We filed 12/7/2017 and got to work assembling a bulletproof NOD with a heart record showing LVEF below 50%. His private doctors agreed it was really 49%. VA predictably had said 55-60%. And then the wait began. We’d asked for an increase on the bent brain to 70%, restoration of the IHD back to 60% and TDIU… and all we heard was crickets.
I’d call the DRO up in Boise every six months and ask whazzup with Ed? More crickets. I started asking my CMA Tina if she could jar it loose to ratings. No dice. Even more crickets. They were sitting on this like a constipated hen. The standard wave off was “We take every claim in the order it is received. Tell Ed he will just have to put on his big-boy pants and suck eggs for a while longer.” I didn’t buy it.
The White House Red Carpet Treatment
Last week, Ed called and said the savings account was getting a little skinny and how could we get this puppy rolling. I noted it had been twenty months-608 days. Considering we Vietnam Vets are at the top of the pile for priority decisions right behind the last WW2 guys and the Korean Boundary Dispute Vets, we should get top-drawer service. The VA says 535 days right now is average for a SOC or a favorable grant on appeal. I suggested we take off the nice guy pants and supplied him with the White House Hotline Number ( 1-855-948-2311).
Ed called the WHH Monday morning, 8/19/2019 at 0800 sharp. And here’s where the bullshit gets pretty deep. The booth bitch took the complaint and promised to look into it with VA. Count ’em. Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday go by. Friday morning at 0923 hrs, Sheila from Boise calls me and introduces herself. We exchanged pleasantries about the weather and confirmed my POA. Sheila tells me they had blisters on their fingers nigh down to the bone diligently working Ed’s claim since (gasp) 8/14/2019. It seems they had gotten a nasty inquiry Monday the 19th about an alleged delay. Sheila wanted to assure me that was not the case. No siree, Alex. In fact, miracle of miracles, they’d been burning the midnight oil all week long and just finished promulgating his decision with a “favorable grant” and wanted to know if I would waive the 72-hour hold (sight unseen) to review it. I guess she thought I was a room temp VSO. I had VBMS online and pulled him up on the screen. Sure as shit, there it was. I played dumb about VBMS and said as long as it was “favorable”, I’d blindly agree to the rating in full and told her to push print. Of course, that would be against the law not to consult with Ed, but since I could actually see it was a real 100% P&T grant and not another bait and switch, I agreed.
The bullshit factor here is I can see every note and every action the raters take on any day, and often the hour and minute they take it. Ed’s NOD had been as cold as a dead mackerel in winter. There hadn’t been so much as a fingerprint on it since it was stored in VBMS on 12/17/2017. The note in “Go to Work” files said “initial development- NRTR (not ready to rate).” The truth is simple. Somebody looked it up and realized they had blown the suspense date for ackshun by about six months. But remember, VA employees do not lie. Never. Verboten. This is not the first time it’s happened. Since few of us have access to VBMS, they think they can blow smoke and we’ll just be no wiser forever.
I promptly put on my ignorant hat. Being a civilized litigator, I thanked Sheila dearest profusely and begged her to overlook my client’s incredible lack of tact, rudeness and impatience and his uncalled for WHH faux pas. Boy howdy, he sure hadn’t run it by me ahead of time or I would have forbidden it. Trump has a lot on his plate right now trying to buy Greeenland. Since she had promised the decision granted everything we wanted, I assured her we wouldn’t darken her door again. Well, not soon anyway. I’m sharpening up the SMC punji sticks as we speak. What about TBI for that unscheduled Huey landing in the upper canopy? Jeopardy, anyone? I’ll take headaches for 50%, Alex.
No Mo’ Dough
An addendum to this. It’s apparent VA has run out of dough for the current fiscal year ending 8/31/2019. The reason? I’ve been watching the posture of my oldest clients’ claims-including Ed’s-and the delay in adjudications is getting embarrassing. I have a Navy Vet over in Allyn, WA. He’s a SW Asia Vet from the Iraqistan misunderstanding so I get it if he isn’t at the front of the line. The problem is VBMS shows him RFD (ready for decision) on 3/18/2019. Do you mean to tell me with the National Work Queue (NWQ) in high gear, they can’t find someone to write this decision? It’s not a crapshoot. I got him a dynamite IMO for bent brain and they’ve been chewing on pencil erasers like bubble gum for a year trying to rebut it. He is just one of about eight or nine others in the same RFD status. VA doesn’t appear to have any money and their litigation posture seems to be “wait until after 9/01/2019”. If it goes past then, the WHH is going to really get some traffic.
I’ve also suggested you folks doing this yourselves (pro se) to let VA deny you before you go on the offensive. Let them show you their denial hole cards first. It’s easier to rebut the denial and argue each one of their reasons than to send in an IMO and let them eviscerate yours first.
Rope-a-doping the VA
I described this on the last Hadit.com radio show a few weeks ago. Remember (if you’re my age) in 1967 when Muhammad Ali (born Cassius Marcellus Clay Jr.) went up against Sonny Liston? Ali did a “rope-a-dope” defense for five rounds and let Sonny bounce him off the ropes. He let old Sonny get plumb tuckered out. In the sixth, he came out and gave him a right cross to the noggin and TKO’d him. This is how you want to win.
Here’s my rope-a-dope defense. I file the bare minimum to begin with. I gladly fill out the VAF 21-4142s and send them in with all the info. Have you ever wondered why, after you do all that, the private records never get into your files? Newsflash. VA will not pay your providers for your private medical records. When the VA calls and says
“What’s the deal? We asked for JohnnyVet’s records and you haven’t coughed them up.”.
The transcription office assistant says
“Sure. That’ll be $151.63- payable to CHS for Mr. ____________’s medrecs.”.
VA says
“Sorry, no dice. We don’t ever pay for them, ma’m.”
Ms. Transcription assistant promptly says “No problem. We don’t ever hand them out for free either. Ta Ta for now.”
You get denied and never know they didn’t obtain and review those requested files unless you get your c-file. That usually happens about six months after you lose and ask to obtain a copy.
My time-proven technique seems excellent-even more so with the new, improved AMA system. Unless you’re filing for a missing foot due to an IED and there’s absolutely no reason on earth to deny, it’s pointless these days to construct a beautiful 20-page brief explaining why your client is entitled to Hep C and you have all these wonderful cites with Internet links and 8 1/2” by 11” glossy photos in color. Let VA show you their two pair. Get the IMO, if necessary, and only then lay down your full house.
Here’s Ed’s brand new rating. The best part is his daughter is still within the magic age limit to get free college under Chapter 35 DEA benefits. I guess the thing that eats me is the interminable delay that increased my representation fees. VA could have had this thing out in January 2018 after everyone’s hangover had subsided. So much for nonadversarial.
Great song and so à propos with the VA’s new Appeals Management Act (AMA). It seems no matter how hard I try to use the correct forms for filing, some VA jackwagon with a room temperature IQ and zero English comprehension will inform me it’s the incorrect form and insist I refile using what he purports to be the correct one. Well what the hey? There are only two possible forms you are permitted to employ. It gets humorous when you refile and they tell you a second time it’s still wrong. Today I’ll also tackle another quandary that upset me greatly and allow you all to vote on how arrogant I am (or appear to be).
WHICH FORM TO USE
With the inception of the AMA, VA has dumbed down the filing system so even Mojo, Homer Simpson’s pet monkey, can do this. Or so we thought. I’m a member of NOVA. They have a private page for us to communicate rant about our problems on all matters VA. One plaint I see over and over again is the one I mention above. It seems incongruous that we advocates are now always out of lockstep on what VA wants. As I mentioned, there are really only two choices now. The venerable VAF 21-526b has been relegated to the dustbin of VA history. Using the VAF 21-4138 was outlawed March 25th, 2015 (see §3.155). Amazingly, I see VSOs were still using this well after 3/15/15 in VBMS with little or no flak from VA Poohbahs. God forbid we VA ambulance chasers tried to do this. It would have been instantly rejected. We’re supposed to know better.
The 526EZ-Yes or No?
As of February 19th, 2019, the only form permitted to be used to file an original claim-i.e. a claim you have never ever filed before- is the VAF 21-526EZ. I wish to thank that Secretary who reduced the 526 from it’s original 26 pages down the present 5. It’s still a bit unwieldy when you are filing it (again) for the Veteran’s fifth new, original claim. Let’s be serious. How many times do you need to capture the data of when you entered, when you separated, which branch you served in and whether it was active or reserve? Trust me when I say if you forgo even one of these metrics in spite of numerous prior submissions of same, it will come back like a boomerang in a week. And, dear Lord, please be sure you annotate each time that you have not been a prisoner of war. Apparently, they need to constantly update the c-file just in case you disremembered that hard time you spent at the Hanoi Hilton back in ’70-’73.
The 20-0995-Yes or No?
Conversely, if you have ever filed for a “condition” in the past and been denied, you must absolutely use the VAF 20-0995 Supplemental Claim form to “reopen” it. Likewise, if you have ever asked for an increased rating for a service connected (SC) condition, you may only use the 995. This gets interesting when I file for a brand new secondary to the original SC condition. The VA compensation gears come to a screeching halt and they reject the 526 as the incorrect form. Where this all gets terribly distracting is when you refile with the 995 and they again reject it by saying you already filed a 526 for this and can’t file twice. I call that the Joseph Heller response (Catch 22).
I think I’ve found the repair order for this and don’t mind sharing it. Due to the impaired IQ of the VA intake chowderheads, we apparently need to instruct them on why we are using the form we are submitting. I do this by including a little blurb in Box 13A under “Specific Issue(s) on the 995 or Section IV, Box 16 on the 526EZ stating:
“Veteran now files his supplemental claim for _____________ condition on the prescribed VAF 20-0995. Veteran filed for this on _/__/____ and was denied.” Or…
“Veteran now files his supplemental claim for for an increase for his _____________ condition on the prescribed VAF 20-0995. Veteran previously filed for this on _/_/____ and was denied (or granted).” Or…
“Veteran now files his VAF 21-0526EZ for ________. This is a brand new condition which has never been filed for and VA requires it be filed on a VAF 21- 526EZ by operation of law.”
This forms insanity doesn’t stop here. VA came out with a new VAF 21-22a in 2018. It’s ever so slightly different than the older 2015 version. Woe betideth any who use that older form. Yes, folks. They will reject it. This also creates a damning domino effect on your attorney/client fee agreement. By law, if you don’t file both documents within 30 days of one another, the fee agreement is null and void. Oddly, your POA representation will remain intact. You’ll discover this problem when you win on appeal and VA refuses to hold back the 20% and pay you. At this point you are at the mercy of the client as to whether you were working for free or get paid.
Arrogance
I confess. I went to an all boys Preparatory School- Vermont Academy. It’s a good thing they didn’t go coed until after I graduated or I might have married early on. By the same token, I guess I’m condemned to being one of those indicted for White Entitlement. I disagree. I was incarcerated there for three years because my father went to Vietnam and my mother refused to let me reside with her. I graduated 59th in a class of 64 so no one can say I was trying to be snooty. I never did get to go to college for a number of reasons so no one can call me uppity or over-educated. In a word, I’m like the majority of my fellow enlisted Veterans. My only claim to something unique was an excellent education and a multilingual mother (French). It gave me a broad, multisyllabic vocabulary. A good education should not, in and of itself, condemn you to being considered arrogant or prideful. Being smarter than the average bear is not a crime.
I have learned over the years that being able to articulate and convey what you seek is essential to VA litigation. As we all know, you can file for DM II and cite to peripheral neuropathy in all four extremities. With the new AMA, chances are you will receive a denial that it wasn’t in your 1970 STRs and you would have been required to file for it within one year of leaving Vietnam. Aruu?
Recently, I was on another Veterans website where I offer advice. I was politely (as possible) trying to explain the difference between asking the VA to fix an obviously flawed decision versus filing a CUE claim. In a nutshell, you cannot file a Motion to Revise a “live” claim. A motion to revise can only be filed in conjunction with a finally decided claim. The operable word here is final. As in dead in the water. As in unappealed or past the one-year suspense date. Do you think I could communicate that concept to the parties I addressed? I was summarily informed I am rude, abusive, lower than whaleshit, arrogant, overbearing and not one soul likes me. Apparently, the others who find me distasteful were just too polite to say so. In fact. I am so despised there that I should roll up my prayer rug and go home. Well shoot. I apologized for coming across that way and begged for forgiveness but was thence informed that my apologies were shallow and meaningless, my advice was incorrect and I shouldn’t hold myself forth as an attorney. The list was far longer but you get the drift.
Here’s the gist of what began this. I attempted to teach CUE but was met with a refusal to accept my interpretation of §3.105(a) Revision of Decisions. Granted, when someone offers advice that is incorrect, I tend to step in and fix it. If the offender is is ignorant of the law and insists on propagating his errors, I sometimes become sarcastic:
Thread
[Redacted] states: “I have to respectfully disagree, if I would have followed this advice verbatim I would not have filed my CUE and won it.” Sure you would have. You could have sent in a letter and said “You screwed up my rating decision. Please fix it-pronto.” Calling the color red black doesn’t make it black just as calling an error CUE doesn’t make it -ipso facto-CUE.
I read over your entire thread, sir. You mentioned that the award “correction” failed to mention the phrase ‘CUE’. This is exactly what I am saying. It is not a true CUE until it is poured in concrete (unappealable). That is why there is no mention in your award letter of any admission of CUE. It is also why [redacted] will never see any admission of CUE-if and when he prevails. VA makes errors all the time. We all know that. Are they CUE? Yes, in a colloquial sense but not a legal sense.
As for the comment our esteemed contributor [redacted] submitted in [redacted]thread : “38 USC is built on 38CFR which is built on Public Laws.”, you may want to go back to law school, sir. I, too, got a good belly laugh out of that chestnut. I also liked your comment about the “First Circuit” (We also know the BVA, CAVC, and First Circuit frequently take a dim view of that habit.). I’m going to assume you mean the Federal Circuit which is identified as “F.3d” on legal cites. Do tell. Where do you come up these legal revelations, sir?
I have said this repeatedly but it bears reiteration. Any here who essay to offer legal advice with no legal training can make matters worse. The legal axiom for doctors is “First, do no harm.” [Redacted] (and many others of you) have learned quite a bit of VA law and some are even well-versed in CUE. I admire all of you for that. All of you are also free to disagree with me and I take no offense but I do ask that we compare apples to apples and not oranges to orangutans. I will repeat- [redacted] did not have a CUE. He had an adjudications error that was subsumed by a corrected ratings decision granting his TDIU. That, folks, is not a Motion to Revise. You cannot cite to §3.105a. The error was corrected before the appeal period expired. In VA law, as in any kind of law, proper semantics (i.e. legal terms) are the defining rule. One who files a Motion to Revise is not a Veteran, a claimant or an appellant. S/he is a “movant”. Feel free to bandy about the term “CUE” as much as you want but simply realize that until your time to appeal a decision runs out, it’s an “adjudication error” and nothing more. You can always resolve it just as [redacted] did-without resorting to a CUE filing under the auspices of §3.105(a). And for the record, I strongly advise no one to use a HLR for anything-even an attempt to “fix” an incorrect rating.
VA will accept a CUE filing but may not CEST (VA term for “claim established”) it if it is not a true CUE. It depends on the rater and the VARO. Most will now, after the new AMA inception, refuse it and tell you to use a 996 HLR. Best of luck and I mean that sincerely. If I could, I’d represent everyone on this forum before the VA. Unfortunately, I do not have the time. Besides, there are quite a few VA Agents in-the-making here who should apply for accreditation. Any one of the regulars here has 10 times the knowledge of a VSO service representative.
This provoked a contributor to opine on my obtuse personality:
“we all know you are proud of yourself. you make that plain. you also spend an inordinate amount of energy trying to belittle others, be intentionally insulting, prove (apparently to yourself) that you think you are smarter or better than others, and of course extol the (self-believed) superiority of AskNod.
It is unattractive and unhelpful. In fact many of your attacks on other posters are childish and down right harmful.
If you don’t want to be helpful that is your business, but attacking others needs to stop.
As I understand it the focus of this site is to help and support other veterans. Your bile is the exact opposite.
Have a nice life living in your self aggrandizing echo chamber.”
Well, anyone who knows me would understand I couldn’t just let that one slide on by…
I did apologize in a round about way…
I apologize if I came across as superior in any way. I have a sarcastic streak and it appears it offends some. I have studied how to win claims for 30 years. I have been bringing that knowledge here free to all who ask for it now-both here at Hadit and my own site- for over 10 years. I am not proud of myself. I chose to help other Vets the best way I knew how. I chose to learn VA Law and become a litigator rather than just sit here offering advice. Don’t confuse pride with commitment. The only thing I’m proud of is being admitted to practice at the CAVC without a Juris Doctorate. Only 46 have been accorded that honor. I’m proud of my three combat V’s for Valour above and beyond the call of duty in less than 2 years. If anything, I’m proud I managed to survive two tours back-to-back in Laos and Vietnam. Many of my friends didn’t. That’s why I predominantly serve Vietnam Veterans before the VA. If you (or anyone) offer bogus advice, why sure, I feel it needs to be challenged. Do you suggest I just let you keep on misleading Veterans by pretending to be knowledgeable about VA law? In your own words sir- As I understand it the focus of this site is to help and support other veterans.
Let’s cut to the chase sir. If I offer poor legal advice to my client and act on it causing my client to lose, the OGC will revoke my accreditation-forever. If you offer poor legal advice and the Veteran uses it to his or her detriment, you are free to just enter a new claim thread and continue offering more of the same. In short, you suffer no censure or consequences. My attempt here was to clarify what is, and what is not, CUE. I merely try to correct that error using real legal cites and precedence. I will continue to gladly suffer your insults if it helps even one more Veteran succeed.
I helped over 750 Veterans attain a minimum of TDIU or 100% before I became accredited in 2016. Free. No charge. I did all the work and wrote the legal briefs-and not because I’m proud of myself. It’s satisfaction in a job well done. And, might I add, correctly done. As we live in America, you have a right to your opinions but you do not have a right to recklessly interpret VA law incorrectly. That is the crux of your problem with me. This isn’t about pride.
It saddens me when someone runs out of legal or logical arguments and finally resorts to hurling insults. That generally indicates they have no more cogent rebuttal to offer. Accept my profound apologies if I upset you. Were you to familiarize yourself with VA law, I wouldn’t need to correct you nor apologize. I respect you as a Veteran and my motives are simple-to ensure you and others win. My advice was aimed solely at that metric. By my estimation, you are positive you are right. Had you been right, [redacted]rating narrative would freely admit a clear and unmistakable error had been made in his decision. VA is not adverse to admitting CUE. See attached below as proof of my statement.
When CUE exists, it is recognized-not glossed over or ignored in a VA ratings narrative. If you (or [redacted]) think the VA examiner just “forgot” to include the CUE discussion in [redacted] decision, you are sadly mistaken.
These rejoinders below, to me, indicate a possible medication management problem. I try to avoid a knock down, drag out fight when dealing with Veterans suffering from MDD. This is why I generally try to be gracious and apologize. This gentleman wouldn’t have it…
i [sic] have tried to read your ramblings. The constant barrage of insults, snark, and down right arrogance make it difficult to get through more than a paragraph at a time.
litigator is a term typically reserved for attorneys, but your choice of that word fits into what is an apparent desire to have the title of Esquire without going to law school.
Do you suggest I just let you keep on misleading Veterans by pretending to be knowledgeable about VA law?
I have mislead no one. you however keep trying to apply the rules of the BVA and CAVC to a claim at the RO. You like to throw around terms like RIPE yet it appears nowhere in the rules of the RO and how claims are adjudicated at that level.
You cannot produce a single RO level CUE that was rejected for not being Ripe.
If I offer poor legal advice to my client and act on it causing my client to lose, the OGC will revoke my accreditation-forever.
yet you are not allowed to offer legal advice to non-clients as you frequently post to dodge answering questions….so what you offer here could not be legal advice or you would be endangering your own credentials.
I am not offering legal advice. I am offering an opinion on structure, format and content. If you had actually read and comprehended what I wrote…where your ego did not get in the way…you would have noticed that….but then that would not allow you to justify your attempts to bully and brow beat others as you crow about your own ego.
I helped over 750 Veterans attain a minimum of TDIU or 100% before I became accredited in 2016
Like one of Trumps claims, there is only your grandiose claim. I am sure you have had good suggestions for others who have been successful, and that is good. Your ego and your mouth however detract from any good you might once have done.
right to your opinions but you do not have a right to recklessly interpret VA law incorrectly. That is the crux of your problem with me. This isn’t about pride.
once again an incorrect pronouncement by King Alex. I have not interpreted any VA law. I have said I believe he has a CUE but I don’t have time right now to review everything he posted. I also suggested to the OP that he file his appeal now, and work to perfect his CUE… note to your ego IT IS HIS CUE. not yours and he is not your client.
The crux of my problem with you is I don’t like bullies.
That generally indicates they have no more cogent rebuttal to offer
yet as your wrote this you searched for more ways to insult people. You remind me of all those people who like to stir up drama and then claim their innocence. Beyond being a bully you are dishonest about your own intentions and actions.
Your apologies are as shallow as the way you present yourself in your postings. But be aware of a real fact. You don’t have the power to “upset” me. All you are is an irritant, like a flea.
Were you to familiarize yourself with VA law, I wouldn’t need to correct you nor apologize.
You have no idea what I am familiar with and as for correcting me it is not your job, nor is it your right to insult people and expect they will not respond. All your complaints amount to your ego being bruised and like the beaten junk yard dog you want to bite something.
your advice amounted to insulting the OP, others, and then me. You tried to use non-applicable terminology and standards not appropriate for a CUE at the RO. Under your claimed finality rule no veteran would ever be able to file CUE at the RO until they reached SCOTUS or let their claim go for a year so the decision became “final”, which under AMA would mean they lose any chance at an EED for the claim under the normal Appeal Process.
that is a fatal and flawed tool at the very best. You demonstrate your lack of skill in that arena every time you try and insult people and then cry about how you are only sarcastic.
Had you been right, [redacted] rating narrative would freely admit a clear and unmistakable error had been made in his decision. VA is not adverse to admitting CUE.
Considering he got is [sic] claim, this line is a joke. VA is most assuredly adverse to CUE or it would not keep touting it as a “rare” event no matter what the CFR says.
If you think the VA examiner just “forgot ” to include the CUE discussion in [redacted] decision
I don’t believe they forgot, I just questioned why it was not there. Your claim is the rankest speculation on your part. You don’t know either.
———————-
Let me be clear Alex, you might have something to offer, yet you bury in vitriol and childish bullying. Your attitude and ego are on full display. Your arrogance is abominable.
This post of your is just more proof you are not man enough, adult enough or reasonable enough to just get out of your own way.
If you don’t agree with things I post, that is fine. Say you don’t agree. Just don’t have temper tantrums and insult people for your own self-amusement. it is unhelpful to other veterans and just demonstrates what a tiny, arrogant, bully you can be.”
So, this tiny 5’9″ arrogant bully asks you. Here’s a poll. You folks vote on it. I don’t even care if you stuff the ballot box Chicago-style. I’m sure not looking for sympathy. I started wearing big boy pants early on. Give me your unvarnished opinion. If I am a total dick, at least have the decency to let me know. Hell, you can even leave in-depth comments on how horrible I am at the bottom below this post. I’m on a “Mission from God” to help Veterans (to plagiarize John Belushi). The man who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the man doing it (to plagiarize a Chinese proverb).
Boy howdy do I love litigating. I read recently that VA litigators experience a lot of angst, depression and despondency. I guess I get some of that when your Vet is dying and you’re just hoping to get it done so he can pass on with less worry. I won one like that last year. Bob passed on July 1, 2018. I got Seattle to grant 100% (but not P&T) on the 19th of June. It’s a battle for DIC now. We’ll win. We always win. Today I write of two dissimilar cases but with the common thread of inept misconstrual. The first is a bald attempt to shitcan a Vet’s appeal we’ve been nursing along since 2010. He began in 1986 and carried the water to 2010. I began helping around then. Before I could be accredited he signed with a NOVA friend. Charlie is retiring and handed him back to me. The second is a daisy. VA is trying to insist my Vet is an inmate in a Texas jail and illegally collecting more than his truncated allotment of 10%.
Johnny Vet #1
Here’s the chronological fact pattern for Johnny Vet #1.
Jimbo (name changed to protect my ass) enlisted in the Marines and went to Vietnam as a grunt. It was pretty bad. A friendly airstrike took out a bunch of his buddies. He came pretty close to getting his name immortalized on the Wall in DC. He signed for a second tour but burned out at 20 months in country. Eating a hurried lunch sitting on the body bags of your buddies can do that to you.
He came home and spent a lot of time on the sixth floor (psych ward) of the new VA Medical Center in Seattle. By 1990, they had him on elephant doses of Thorazine… and about 15 other tranquilizers just to slow him down to 78 RPM.
Then the seizures began due to drug toxicity. So he filed for seizures secondary to his SC 100% Bent Brain. Pretty simple and inextricably intertwined. Harris v. Derwinski had just been decided so he was covered-right? Not. Seattle, on remand from the BVA to issue a missed SOC for the seizures, denied Jimbo and insisted he file a VA 1-9. Jimbo got the 60-day letter about 120 days later. His VVA rep had split for parts unknown. Jimbo knew a little VA law and figured he didn’t need to file yet another VA 9 so he wrote them a 4138 love letter explaining this. They took that to be a NOD objecting to them closing his appeal out as untimely. And off to the horse races they went. Jimbo filed about 10 more 4138s before he zoned out. Seattle kept rope-a-doping him until he gave up.
He kept filing for seizures through the decades and finally one last time in 2010. And lo, one day in 2014 on appeal again, a VA examiner actually looked at his DD214 and noted he had a Combat Action Ribbon. Bingo. The Combat presumptive under §1154b kicked in and they gave him seizures for 100% effective on his filing date of 2010…but due to TBI.
He filed a NOD for the earlier 1990 date on a 4138 April 6th, 2015–just twelve days after the VA revamped §3.155. This meant he now had to use a VAF 21-0958. I got him lined out on that just in time and he refiled on April 20th, 2015 with just nine days to his one year suspense date. The VA accepted the NOD and it’s all there in the VBMS.
In March 2016, they suddenly said “Hold the phone, Ramone. The time to object to your 1990 appeal expired June 6th, 1992.” So, he filed another NOD objecting to them closing out his legitimate NOD from the April 28th, 2014 100% grant. Are you lost yet?
My attorney friend took over in late 2016 and tried to cut the Gordian Knot the VA had tied. He finally gave up on a formal DRO review and opted in to the RAMP program in January 2018 and asked for a HLR decision.
VA got around to this in March 2019-a year later(so much for Rapid). They mulled it over for a month and closed out the original legacy appeal because-hey- your appeal can’t be in both places at once. Now it was an AMA Higher Level of Review claim. VA promptly declared they could not do it in HLR because it wasn’t a compensation claim but rather an earlier effective date claim which was not in the HLR purview.
So they closed out the AMA HLR and poof. Jimbo’s 2015 NOD evaporated into thin air. This is where I began sharpening punji sticks and fetched a shovel. I tried to get traction with my Supergirl Change Management Agent Tina here in Seattle. No dice. The Veterans Service Center Manager in Winston Salem VARO refused to budge. They were not going to fix it. I emailed a few hand grenades to Kimberley and let her know I was preparing the Extraordinary Writ. I also cc:’d Wilkie and the Head of the Appeals Management Office now called the Appeals Resolution Center (ARC). Mr. McLenachen was out on summer vacation and I got one of those “I’ll be back in the office on 8/12. If you’re thinking of committing suicide, please don’t. Call Marge instead at (202)366-1234.”
So I bided my time. About August 5th, Kimberley finally returned my email and said “So I guess it’s too late to stop the Ex Writ. I reckon we’ll see you at the CAVC.” I sent another mail bomb over saying “Negatory, Kimbo. I’m just waiting for the ARC boss to weigh in.” And the next morning he cc:’d “We’re looking it over.” This morning, I see a brand new EP 171 announcing Jimbo’s NOD of 4/20/2015 is legit and the suspense date for some Action Jackson on this baby is 8/25/2019. That’s only fair. Christ. The NOD is now four years and four months old. Problem solved thanks to the miracle of the VBMS. It tells you who owns it. And it has their phone number, too.
On behalf of the Asknod Corporation, my thanks goes out to Mr. McLenachen for being a man of his word. Two and half attaboys for cutting the Winston Salem Gordian knot.
Johnny Vet #2
Johnny Vet number 2 was inches away from finally getting a five-year-old claim for Agent Orange presumptives from Thailand. We Thai Vets don’t get the AO presumptive regardless of what you heard. That was the Navy pukes who scored this spring. We still have to win them one at a time the hard way.
So I wake up one morning last week. The Claims Queue shows a transaction occurred. I see it’s Johnbo but instead of a 100% grant for Prostate there’s a prison report in Johnbo’s VBMS Documents section. Seems Johnny was arrested for peeing in a park in Texas back in 2010 out in the quasi-open. He got a misdemeanor ticket and was released the next morning. The charges were dismissed when he explained he had prostate cancer secondary to his military service in Vietnam, Laos and Thailand. As he was frequently incontinent, he tried to surreptitiously “let a little bit out” near a bush. There were no outhouses and it was about ten at night. Go figure America’s finest in Blue were out on a faggot perp patrol.
I had him call the White House Hotline and report that he just found out the prison report was in his VBMS efolder. I’m guessing those gals who work there at the telephone bank in West Virginia have heard everything. I bet it plum rolled down their socks to look in there and see he was right!
Well, faster than you can say Jack Robinson in VAspeak, I saw a note in there this morning that they had somehow figured this whole mystery out. Jimbo had never filed for anything until 2014. So he wasn’t collecting 60% while living the life of Reilly in the __________ County Jail for the last 9 years. No harm, no foul. Just a slight delay of eight days for nothing. Nonadversarial, you say? I don’t see it. Daddy used to say excuses are like assholes. Everybody has one and they stink. They were shopping for dirt which is against the law in the 56 Regional Offices across our fruity plains.
Good afternoon, campers. Jerrell has asked me to once again join him and his merry band of Veterans on his Blogtalk radio program tonight. As usual, I am honored to be able to pass on my fractured faery tales of VA misdeeds and ways to surmount their foibles.
Today’s show will discuss Independent Medical Opinions (IMOs) and ways you can obtain these letters without having to relinquish your firstborn male child. I was recently ostracized by a fellow VA litigator last week for what I surmised as offering my IMO services for far less than his. His argument was severely disjointed and I had a hard time with the run-on sentences and dangling participles. I finally asked Cupcake if she could decypher his bent.
My IMOs are authored by a group of doctors of various medical fields who work with Mednick Associates. The owner, Adam Taranto, is now a personal friend. He tries to help Veterans as cheaply as possible while still eking out a living. In this endeavor, he has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. As I have mentioned, his doctors are able to do this for $1,500. In addition, they will opine on secondaries to the primary illness/injury at no extra charge-within reason.
Mednick’s last IMO for Hepatitis C and it’s residuals also included cirrhosis, esophageal varices and ascites (fluid buildup in the abdomen) at no extra charge to the client. The fellow VA litigator, who will remain nameless, feels I do the profession (VA attorneys and Agents) irreparable harm by charging such a paltry fee. What can I say? I feel it would be avaricious to mark up the cost of something I have no hand in. Moreover, if the fee is $1,500, that’s what I will charge-even if it upsets some of my fellow litigators.
As it is, when a Veteran approaches me for representation, I don’t ask for a bank statement of his checking and savings accounts. Many don’t even have $1,500 to pay for the IMO. In those instances, I pay for it myself out of pocket and ask for it back when we win. I have yet to have any renege on the fee. But then we’re talking about Veterans-folks who agreed to serve their country knowing full well they risked bodily injury doing so. Seems they’d be stand up folks who wouldn’t sky out on a debt.
We’ll talk about that and anything else you callers dream up today. Showtime is 1600 Hrs on the westerly coast and 1900 Hrs on the easterly stretch.
The call in number is
347-237-4819 (push #1 to talk)
Thank you-all of you-for your service. I know that grates on your ears when some VA puke says it but I mean that genuinely. By the same token, I thank all you who have entrusted your claims to me and allow me to represent you. It’s a great honor and I do not take it lightly. As most know, I always answer or return your calls. I sure don’t want to gain a reputation akin to that of a Veteran Service Officer. Perish the thought.
Be there or be poorer for it. Here’s a link to the show:
Thank you Smoke. I needed a good tag line. A lot of us suffered for years in the era of Non A, Non B Hepatitis before they isolated it and gave it a real name. And, much like finally giving something or someone a name, an Independent Medical Opinion gives your Hepatitis C a name. In VA jurisprudence, we call it service connection and with it comes a VA compensation check. Now for the back story on this horse with no name.
David and his wife began fighting in October 2014 to attain service connection for this beastly disease. Even after listening to me on Hadit.com radio shows and reading my offered advice, they were unable to come up with that killer Independent Medical Opinion (or nexus letter) that put this thing in the bag.
They had their representative file the opt-in to a RAMP Higher Level of Review (HLR) to get a quicker win back in 2018 March. As fate would have it, their VSO rep. forgot to file it. This is one of those silver lining things but I’ll get back to that later. They kept going and all of a sudden it wasn’t a RAMP HLR at all but the BVA. Nobody explained it to them. Their rep had been fired about the time the RAMP opt-in was supposed to have been filed.
Fast forward to about 4/10/2019. David’s spouse called me and begged me to take this before it went up on the rocks. It went up on the rocks on April 16th, 2019 when the BVA Veterans Law Judge affirmed the denial of service connection. Unbeknownst to me, I filed the POA and it kicked in on 4/30- a wee bit late to help them.
We NOVA attorneys and agents just got the most detailed briefing available in March at the Nashville Conference. The new process is virtually untested at the moment. The AMA is brand new. There is little data to study on success/failure vs getting a rapid decision on using the supplemental lane. There is endless conjecture whether VA would honor the AMA’s promise you can take the denied appeal back to the Regional level and file a supplemental claim with new and relevant evidence-like a killer IMO. This avenue allegedly lets you avoid the Motion for Reconsideration at the BVA (which would easily take a year just to agree to a new decision) or the same one-year path to the CAVC but with no new evidence allowed to be entered. Much like untested ice, no one who walked out on it has come back to tell us if VA was lying -er- peeing on our collective leg and telling us it was raining. Looks like we’re good to go from this decision, fellow litigators.
My clients sometimes don’t last five years so I try to get the benefits awarded asap. The fee is not the reason we do this. With the new AMA, and the implication I could take the BVA denial to the Supplemental lane, win for the client … and preserve the effective date of October 2014 seemed like a bait-and-switch thing with more Catch 22s than a military enlistment form. To think I could pull off this gig in fourteen days was sheer effrontery. Look up ‘slow’ in the dictionary and there’s an 1899 picture of Gen. Custer’s widow holding up her pending 1876 claim for DIC.
So with great reservations, I launched a Supplemental claim on July 5th for reopen of Hep C due to jetguns and all the other risks. I submitted my brand new IMO from the medical wizards at Mednick Associates and 14 days later-i.e. today, July 19th- the narrative and the confirmed ratings sheet came out for 100% permanent and total. I was sure one of two things would happen. First, they’d say “Yep, you proved it was service connected, David… but only as of 7/05/2019 when you sent in that new claim with the IMO”. The flip side was they’d say “Yep you won but the agent doesn’t get any dough because this is a brand new“supplemental” claim. Your 2014 legacy appeal is final.” Shockingly, I was wrong on both counts. No, I’m not being cynical. The Legacy track isn’t convertable to the AMA after a BVA decision. Perish the thought that’s coming into your head. VA has now spoken. The presumption of regularity posits that they can make no mistakes. Far be it from me to disturb this. We’re all taught to sit there and smile. I’ve learned how to smile while I eviscerate their asses legally. Remember, I have an ax to grind. VA insisted I never served in the Republic of Vietnam for almost twenty years(1989-2008). For the record, I served two tours back to back (5/1970 to 5/1972). And, unlike Senator Richard Blumenthal, I have plenty of medals to prove it.
Lastly, the silver lining in this VA claims cloud is simple. A VSO signed a RAMP opt-in form and failed to file it in January 2018. That failure unfortunately cannot be used against the Georgia Department of Veterans Affairs. They are lawsuit-proof. You can’t sue them for providing free quasi-legal advice and assistance. However, it appears to have sufficiently shamed the VA into promptly adjudicating the instant claim we filed July 5th, 2019. David’s missus also called her Congressman which helped, too, I’m sure.
Here’s the opening brief and the VAF 20-0995 I used as a template for your own DIY or legally assisted claims:
And here’s the decision at 12:34:58 Atlanta Time today. What a wonderful thing to read first thing in the morning over coffee on Pacific Daylight Time…
Granted, my client was flashed for terminally ill. He’s my age and my generation. He served during my Vietnam War. He enlisted like me. He’d do this for me if he could. Of that, I have no doubt. Leave no one behind. Not on a Jungle Trail. Not on a Desert Trail. Not on a Paper Trail®. That’s Theresa Aldrich’ tagline, not mine. It evokes my sentiments though. And yes, David and his spouse found me on Hadit.com. We’re all in this together. NOVA is just the uppercase “A” in VA’s ICARE mantra.
So… take a good, long gander at the IMO we submitted above, ladies and gentleman. This is the ammunition you’ll need to win. You cannot submit a letter from your doctor that merely says ‘he got blasted with a jetgun ipso facto he got HCV from the jetgun.’ That will not put the chicken in the pot. IMOs are a medical art form most doctors do not comprehend. They mean well but writing a good nexus requires peer-reviewed citations much like the ones the IMO author referred to in the above IMO. You cannot use internet articles because they don’t have your name on them. Anything from Wikipedia is useless because anyone can post on it. BVA decisions are not precedential. You can claim HCV is caused by alien abduction on Wikipedia and it might stay on there for a week. That may be plenty of time to print up a copy before someone comes along and takes down your artful attempt at subterfuge but it won’t win the claim.
Gotham City Commissioner Jerrel Cook has turned on the Batlight on the roof of the headquarters of Gotham City Police Department. I spotted it and answered his call. It’s time for the Hadit Dot Com Radio Show again tomorrow at 1600 Hours Local on the Far Left-ward Coast, which is 1700 Hrs on the Least Coast, 1800 Hours in the great State of Texas, and Lord only knows what hour in Arizona, Mr. Cook and crew will allow me to teach you new techniques in the art of the Duty to Assist in the brave new Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act or simply the AMA.
Most importantly, you will learn the “new” way of VA thinking about your claim(s), when you first filed them and what you filed for. And whether they even addressed all the claims. We’ll discuss how to navigate this maze of multiple-choice, judicial disaster areas. If you aren’t careful, you’ll lose a lot of time refiling in the proper lane to get this ball rolling properly.
The call in number remains
347-237-4819 (push #1 to talk)
Here’s a recording of the podcast if you missed it.
Every once in a while, either someone sends me a great article or a link to one. Once, I got the Army manual on the care and feeding of jetguns. Nurse Silvia went one better and sent me a whole jetgun. Last night I received the BVA Purplebook, known in decades past simply as the BVA handbook. It isn’t a Top Secret/Crypto For Your Eyes Only document, but then again it isn’t exactly well-known outside the BVA. In fact, the 2018 version below is one of the few known to exist outside 810 Denial Avenue NW. I’m waiting for BVA Chief Honcho Cheryl Mason to call next Monday and ask me to take it down under threat of losing my license to torment the 56 Puzzle Palaces across our fruited plains.
Oddly, even VA Veterans Law Judges have been known to cite to it. I ran across it several days ago when one of my friends deep in the heart of Texas asked me if I’d ever heard of it. This was in relation to an interesting new CAVC appeal ( Docket #18-6798) which is only now at the appellant’s brief stage. It’s going to be a barn burner class action suit with a panel on Hypertension due to Agent Orange herbicide exposure. See https://efiling.uscourts.cavc.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom
Type in 18-6798 in the case number/ range box.
As most of you know, the VA was expected to include several new service connected presumptives to include hypertension by June 30th of this year- now three days past. Due to matters beyond the VA Secretary’s control (think Procopio), that isn’t going to happen. The entry of the Blue Water Squids (just out to the 12-mile limit, mind you) is going to create a dent in the VA compensation coffers and there will be no money left for merit pay for a while until Shulkin Wilkie gets a new budget in the next fiscal year.
The Purplebook is numbered identically as the M 21 which is a non sequitur. The BVA, and every Law Judge I argue in front of, categorically deny they will accept the M 21 1MR as “law”. I have been interrupted in mid-sentence at oral briefing and told to convert the cite to 38 USC or CFR for the record. The Purple Book is essentially a compendium of precedence compiled by the BVA from the ever-evolving decisions of the CAVC, CAFC and the Supreme Court. Procopio is an excellent example of how Haas v Peake was rendered obsolete in less than 12 years. Karnas turned into Kuzma and so on. Law changes and so must the Purplebook.
The Purplebook is a primer for the slew of new GS 14 BVA staff attorneys-many of whom are arriving from law school with their new degrees and can’t even spell Veteran. Most Veterans do not realize that Veterans law is almost alien to most FNG law dogs. They’ve been taught nothing about this venue. When they’re hired, they have to virtually go back to law school and learn its intricacies from scratch. Unfortunately, there is no true law school devoted to teaching pure VA law in existence except here at asknod. Concepts like deferential treatment to pro se Vets, the benefit of the doubt and far more require reading 38 USC and 38 CFR to comprehend we are a sheltered class granted all manner of special considerations.
I caught a fleeting glimpse of this Purplebook mention in a February 2019 BVA decision here:
Subsequently, it appears that jurisdiction over the claims regarding
the migraine headaches was transferred to the RO in Des Moines, Iowa. However, because this appeal originated from the RO in Waco and does not involve issues dependent on different law and facts, it will be the subject of this decision. See BVA Memorandum No. 01-18-04; VA Purple book 01-18-v1.0.0. Moreover, the Veteran currently resides
in Texas; hence, jurisdiction should be changed as appropriate.
After spotting it again in Mr. Johnson’s brief at the CAVC, it became a quest to unearth this “adjudications manual”. While the document, in and of itself, is probably not earth-shattering, it’s one more tool in the Veterans law tool belt. I see it more as a guidebook to measure how a VLJ will approach your decision. Will s/he bend over backwards to give you real justice or will s/he merely pay VA law lip service and merrily proceed to adjudicate the appeal as they see fit? At least this way you might find a piton to drive into a judicial crack and prevail.
I find it disingenuous to have a document like the Purplebook in existence and have no one the wiser of its application to VA law. It just seems sleazy and underhanded to hide it or to avoid disclosing its existence. In my mind, our claims process is stacked heavily against us as most Vets are ignorant of VA law. For the BVA to obfuscate and dissemble to the VA lawyer or Agent is even more egregious. It sounds like a book about Barney the Dinosaur.
Please thank all of those who work at VA who feel we need to know as much as we can behind the scenes judicially.
Et voilà- the Purplebook, courtesy of a good friend who will remain nameless.
P.S. I’m flattered. I googled the term BVA Purplebook and it comes up with asknod. Funnier yet, someone attached the links to a post on appeals over at one of our competitor sites known to have VA Veterans Benefits Administration DROs as moderators . They also 86’d me after I asked too many questions about 6 years ago. The link was promptly erased to suppress any mention of asknod, Fergoogle or the Purplebook. You can still see it here in the screen grabs:
As you can see when you go to the link, it’s dead. The site’s censors are careful to eradicate anything I author that might be helpful to Veterans. Pro VA or Pro Veteran? We report. You decide. Ask yourself why any Veteran or Veterans website would want to suppress information which might be useful to other Veterans.
Wowser, I thought I had a good week with three wins but now I find it was four. Nothing gives me greater pleasure than to announce my squid/grunt/doorgunners’ success over the Eeeevil Goliath VA. You Veteran clients don’t realize it but you are one of those statistics that VA keeps track of. A chicken dinner winner (100% or TDIU) occurs exactly 12% of the time at the VARO level. The percentage jumps up to 22% at the BVA and to 74% at the CAVC counting all forms of set aside/reverse/vacate. Even better, when broken down, VA attorneys and the Great Unwashed Agents account for a whopping 35% of wins at the Board level alone. I’m appalled. It should be 100% of the time. 
What set this story off was US Congressman Derek Kilmer helping me get my medals 43 years after they were awarded in 2013. In 2015, a close neighbor’s old platoon company got together and helped him get a long-overdue Silver Star. Naturally, Congressman Kilmer (who helped immensely) was there to pin it on him. For reference, a Silver Star is one step below the Medal of Honor. Usually, the Company Commander, a 90-day wonder with slats, is the big winner and the enlisted underlings get a Bronze Star- maybe even one with a “V”. Or an ACM…or nothing
asknod
Bethanie Spangenberg
kcraveiro
robinhoodesqvetsatty
Wesley McCauley
Veterans Claims Help 