THE NEW VA AMA–A CHUTES AND LADDERS GAME FOR VETS

Yeppers. You read that right. But it doesn’t begin to describe what I’m trying to convey to all you aspiring pro se Veterans, freshly minted Juris Doctorates seeking an exciting career in VA law or older, more experienced attorneys looking to view a problem from a different, untrained legal aspect. Remember, I have no legal training in this arena but still am batting .1000 after eleven years.

What I wrote in my book in 2012 is just as on point now in 2019. Folks are still buying the Kindle download to this day and putting really nice comments in the Amazon ‘confirmed buyer’ comments section. It’s rumored I might break even on my investment by 2032 if this keeps up. No, seriously.  It’s a bargain at $3.99 and I get 10%.

One of my clients is an attorney so this is especially poignant. She came down with Multiple Sclerosis while in the Navy and made it almost three years before it overcame her. She took advantage of the GI bill and got a degree and followed up with law school. Sadly, the overwhelming burden of raising a husband and children and trying to cope with MS was too much. I gladly accepted her as a client. She described it thusly…

This is your Brain

This is your Brain after Law School

I get that. You have to learn a lot about law and it’s probably stuff like Trigonometry-shit you’re never going to use if you focus exclusively on being a Veteran Ambulance Chaser.  I know that’s a coarse job description but I heard it used by a DAV Poohbah once to describe us evil, bloodsucking agents and attorneys who exact our 20% pound of flesh from those we serve. Anyway, you’re not going to get much call for tort law, criminal law, patent law, divorce law and a host of others. Unfortunately, all brains have just so much capacity and stuffing in a heaping dose of tax law is a severe waste of available megabytes. You’re wanting to focus on becoming the Perry Mason of VA law but dragging that JD brain around with useless 0 and 1 algorithms.

So, by the time you graduate with the sheepskin, you don’t know whether to shit or go blind. Your brain is marching to the beat of another drummer. You have been taught to be too meek and nonconfrontational. You over-analyze every case and ignore human nature. You want to please. You are not in the habit of dealing with charlatans and folks who create law out of whole cloth. In a word, you are a Padawan. Few at this stage ever  dive in to VA Law solo. After about five or ten years of this, it’s like fishing with hand grenades.

Enough with the self flagellation. I can sleep well at night because I didn’t set out to make money. My joy is simply winning my claims for my Veterans. Ed and Leona just found out Saturday night that I managed to wrangle SMC at the R1 rate for them. I spotted it as a “Pre-promulgation” that needed  some more signatures on Friday PM.  I feel doubly honored to represent these folks as Leona is Dan and Signe Moser’s daughter and her husband also fought in Vietnam. He even has a CIB to prove it.

redact R 1

Eleven Bravo 20 Ed Dunn (right)

The Moser Family (Leona in center)

Boy howdy if that wasn’t enough, I was fortunate to win R1 for Dan as well before he passed. As for the bloodsucking legal fees- there are none. The Little Rock Puzzle Palace granted without a whimper. We filed mid-January and I managed to get my CMA to flash him for very seriously ill. VA’s attitude initially was :

” Mr. Graham. The M 21 doesn’t permit advancement on the docket when you’re already at SMC P (SMC L plus K plus §3.350(f)(4) advancement to the next higher rate of M). Mr. Dunn will just have to take his place in line.” Well, ‘not exactly’ as they say down at Dollar a Day Rentacar.

This is where not having been to law school really puts the mustard on the hot dog. Nobody has ever told me I can’t call up the White House Hotline on behalf of my Veteran and beg for advancement. Or look up the name, rank, airspeed, tail number and last known heading of the VA’s Change Management Agent (CMA) at Fort Fumble in Arkansas. Screw sending an email. Next, go to the NVLSP’s Veterans Benefits Manual published by LexisNexis and get the telephone number of the Regional Director and call her/him. They’re on Central Time I think. Tell the receptionist to connect you to the CMA. I love that cross between a splutter and a stutter when they finally blurt “Excuse me, wh-wh-who is this?” A quick “Alex Graham, ma’m. VA #39029. I need to talk to him about my client.” Every one of them has said ” Whatza CMA?” or “Sir, do you have a number I can give them to return your call?” The best one yet is “I’m sorry sir but you need to call the 800-827-1000 line and talk to one of our specialists.” Whatever. It works. The 800 number is for the VSOs, not us. They call me back- and most especially if I’ve called the WHH. I love to litigate via phone with these chuckleheads.

This telephone method is quicksand for VA people. It’s not in a preservable format like an email. Nobody thinks to have a tape recorder handy for these occasions. It’s hard to defer to M 21 when someone is asking you question after question without respite.

 VA Chutes and Ladders

 

Here’ the big story. The new AMA is nothing more than a cattle stockyard. VA drives the Vet into the preliminary chute with the first 526. S/he doesn’t have a clue whazzup. They usually are pro se or have a VSO who is equally clueless and paid to stay that way. The inevitable outcome is usually a loss or a minor win consisting of some old Mardi Gras beads ( Tinnitus and hearing loss for 0%).  However, the big ticket items like PTSD or lumbosacral strain remain denied. Now, with the new AMA, you have to find some new evidence or some new compelling medical theory which supports your first untrained argument. That first denial is effectively the end of the VA’s duty to assist. You are now on your own, cousin. A second denial after entering the next chute (the supplemental claims lane) will cause even more roadblocks. Pretty soon you’ve used up all your Buddy letters and the pseudo-nexus your VA doctor gave you that says it might/could’ve/ possibly/probably/ almost always is related to service.  Nobody will tell you of the need for a properly constructed, favorable medical opinion. So far, everyone’s told you you don’t need any fancy legal help. Those VA DBQs they hand out for your doctor to fill out don’t have a block to write in the nexus and describe why it’s probative. VA has their own DBQs for QTC, VES and LHI. Guess what? They’re waaaaay different and actually do have a block where the doctor/nurse/bedpan changer explains why you’re not going to be shopping for a new car this summer.

If you lose, most of these VSO pseudo-helpers will guide you into a Higher Level of Review and  another bitchslap. This is the old DRO review- as in- “What part of ‘No!” didn’t you get, sir?” An interesting facet of the AMA is it lets you continue to lose without any limits on the number and pathway of appeals. Thus you can go from the 526 initial rating, get a denial, file a NOD at the Board of Appeals and lose and still go back to the RO and the  supplemental lane and refile the same claim again with no loss of effective date. This is how the VA sold Congress on this rope-a-dope appeals thing. Since most Veterans will never get quality legal representation, VA can let them ping around inside this Hall of Mirrors cattle yard and never get anywhere with an original claim. The greater majority of Veterans give up once they see how it’s rigged against them. I did in 1994. It’s different when you’re dying. Hence, the Win or Die logo. was added to the VA claims game.

Veterans were confused enough after WW2 and Korea trying to understand why they were missing big chunks of arms and legs and only getting 10% for it. Or $20 a month for a lost eye. Vietnam Vets discovered much the same thing. VA wasn’t, and never will be,  a font of information about what you need to succeed. With the advent of the new AMA, the tunnel just got about 5 miles longer for most Vets.  If you had actually begun to understand the old system, you just got the ultimate whammy. You now have to go back to school to learn it all over.

I’m hearing from a lot of my fellow members of NOVA that VA is confusing Legacy appeals with the newer AMA stuff post -2/19 and illegally denying it or… worse yet, instructing us to file it on one of the newer forms for the  supplemental lane or HLR. The blind are now leading the deaf across town and vice versa. It will be some time before the dust settles on this. Meanwhile VSOs are still using the old 21-0958 NODs to file at the BVA instead of the new VAF 10182. It’s a zoo and VA loves to aid and abet the confusion.

Vets come to me and describe this as the ultimate conspiracy. Relax. It isn’t. It’s nothing more than gross ignorance and incompetence. I figure it’ll take several years before the  Legacy claims are all but extinct. When that finally occurs, the raters will finally learn the new method and we’ll start bugging Congress to fix the new AMA and make it more Veteran-friendly. Call it AMA 2.0 right now.

And that’s all I’m going to say about that.

 

 

 

Posted in All about Veterans, Appeals Modernization Act, Duty to Assist, KP Veterans, Lawyering Up, Lay testimony, M-21 info, NOVA Attorneys, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA AMA appeals knowledge, VA Attorneys, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

HADIT.COM RADIO SHOW–HOW THE NEW AMA DISENFRANCHISES YOU

Yes, folks. The above headline is true. Remember the old “well-grounded claim” we were required to submit before the 2001 passage of the VCAA? No evidence was equal to no dice prior to that passage. What happened if your records were burned up in the 1973 NPRC BBQ? Sorry, no dice. 

Worse, in the new World Order of the AMA, the duty to assist has flown the coop. From now on, you’re on your own, cousin. If you can’t find anything you need to help you win and the VA or the Army has it, you better sharpen up the FOIA punji sticks and build a pit. It will take a month or three of Sundays to evict this from the Govt. Poohbahs. Or, they may even say, we have it right here in Maryland at NARA. Come on down to view it because we’re not going to reproduce it and mail it to you.

We’ll discuss the two components of claims-case and controversy- that are the bookends to any VA claim. We’ll talk about the difference between VA “inventing” law and the true meaning of “by operation of law”. We’ll talk about the “legal standard of review” of a claim versus VA’s convoluted legal abortion.

I won’t spoil it ahead of time for you folks. It’s heavy on legalese but this is going to become important to you when you see how we got sold a bill of goods disguised as a “much-needed reform” to help us win. If you think VA is going to help you win, you’ve been smoking too much Mantanuska Funderthuck.

Lots of stories. Lots of knowledge. Be there or be square. 1600 Hrs on the Left Coast and 1900 on the (L)east Coast. John and Jerrell are our hosts and I look forward to this chat.

347-237-4819

Dial one (1) to activate the microphone and enter the discussion. Remember, this is all about you Veterans. Feel free to ask questions about these subjects. Try to refrain from telling us your claims history. We want to inform, not focus on any and every screwup VA has ever committed. I find that there’s a reason the rearview mirror is so small and the windshield on a car is so large. It’s more important to see where you’re going than to endlessly replay the past. If it didn’t work out in 2006, you need to up your claims game. Tune in to see what you need to succeed.

 

Posted in All about Veterans, Appeals Modernization Act, ASKNOD BOOK, CAVC Knowledge, Food for thought, Future Veterans, KP Veterans, Nexus Information, NOVA Attorneys, SVR Radio on hadit.com, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA Attorneys | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

MEMORIAL DAY 2019–DIRTY DEEDS, DONE DIRT CHEAP

I hope this Memorial Day weekend finds you as blessed as I am. To be alive is not to be taken lightly at my age. While Memorial Day is a remembrance of those who served and have moved on to a new plane of existence, I do not consider them departed. I can still see that curl of a smile on my Dad’s face when he was funning me as a kid. He might be eleven years in the ground in General Robert E. Lee’s front yard (Arlington National Cemetery) but he’s still only a thought away.

Did your dad ever tell you never to push them buttons under the radio dial? I was  briefed in on this in 1958 on my Dad’s old ’54 Ford wood-simulated Ranch wagon . There were five buttons. The first four released the wheels in standard order (port/starboard front and port/starboard rear). The fifth was the fire extinguisher for the engine. If you’ve ever flown in airplanes, it wouldn’t sound strange to retract the landing gear or have engine fire suppression. Besides, your dad would never lie to you.

With that said, I took it a step further with my daughter Heidi. You can see the opposite direction of a traffic light turn from green to yellow. Ergo, you can “predict” when the the light facing you will change from red to green. I’d “throw a whammy” on the light by pointing at it and snapping my fingers and grunting as I closed my eyes. Lo and behold, the light changed green. Heidi quit believing in Santa Claus years before she figured it out. Ah. The things we do for love.

My father’s idea of humor was renowned across the forward air bases in France shortly after the war. He and a few buddies would “drop in” on an airpatch in their P-51s -all with more than five Swastikas indicating they were aces. They’d grab transport over to the Officer’s club Stag bar for Happy Hour. He had a briefcase handcuffed to his wrist and they all had .45s on their hips. Eventually an inquisitive pilot would ask what they were doing in town. By this time, Dad was a Lt. Colonel and his cohorts were either Majors or Captains. Dad and the others would quietly and cryptically explain they were signing up pilots to fight in Africa for the Free French Republic. But only hot shot pilots, mind you. They never had to buy a drink all night long. Eeeeeeeeveryone wanted to join as most were getting ready to return home to Dullsville, USA for deactivation. The story was always the same-there were only a few slots left so you had to be good at deflection shooting and be quick about making a commitment to sign up.

WR F Down For Double with Invasion colors and 16 1/2 “kills”

Be All You Can Be – Become a VA Agent

And while I have your attention, I’d like to discuss helping the Veterans who are still here or their widows. There is nothing finer than donning the clothing of David and striking down the VA Goliath with legal stones. Becoming a VA agent is not nearly as onerous as you might think. Some of you toiled for years to win as I did and do not realize you have inadvertently learned a vast quantity of knowledge about the VA process.

This is what I suggest. Take that knowledge and hone it like a knife and use it to help your fellow Vets. If you are well off, you can simply donate your services as I do a lot of the time. The majority of my wins are often at the local level and we win without having to take it to appeal. In these cases, there is no fee to the Veteran anyway which is great. If you want to do it for a living, it will be a slow process amassing any wealth but rich with rewards for both you and the Veterans you help. You almost become another member of the family in most cases or forge lifelong friendships with their children.

Paying it forward is not nearly as difficult as most think. Attached below are several files to download. One is a sample test with 97 questions. To our knowledge, the tests have always been pulled from these questions. The test itself was 28 questions with 90 minutes to accomplish it when I sat for it in 2016. I’ve heard it may be as low as 21 questions now. The pass/fail line is 75% or greater.

Once you pass, you can keep your accreditation forever by amassing a certain number of continuing legal education (CLE) hours every two years. I use NOVA for my learning requirements and also benefit by learning the latest cutting edge techniques from other attorneys as well as VA employees who come to brief us on new procedures.

Interestingly, if you find some of the types of claims I encounter with Vietnam Vets, chances are you’re going to eventually come across a Megamillion Lotto winner who got screwed by VA back in 1970. It’s like unraveling a sweater but no more complicated than that.  Besides, you can always do what the two Agents I’ve coached to accreditation do- call me and ask for advice. Hell, even I call up my Sensei Bob Walsh and beg knowledge occasionally.

It’s my earnest hope that the 350 agents now will one day metastasize into 3500 and spread out across the fruited plains to do battle with this insidious VA monster. Remember, it’s a recipe like baking cookies. Anyone can learn it. With the advent of Independent Medical Opinion (IMO) sites, it’s easy to get a nexus letter tying a disease or injury to a Veteran’s military service.  Time may be of the essence here, however. VA is rumored to be considering doing away with the Agent position soon. All of us who are currently accredited would be grandfathered in but the option would gone forever. It’s certainly something to think about sooner rather than later.

Enjoy what I’ve been enjoying now for three years- kicking ass and taking names for fun and profit. You can spread a lot of good cheer with any profit if you don’t need it, too.  I learned all this from Alan Gumpenberger down in 2016  Spring NOVA in Las Vegas. He graciously allows me to share it with others. Look him up if you want more info on the subject: http://www.alphadisability.com/tag/allen-gumpenberger/

VA adjudication is what we used to call a “target-rich environment” in Laos. There are 350-ish VA Agents/nonattorney practitioners and about 600-700 VA attorneys who do this in addition to divorce, wills, ambulance chasing, Social Security and tax/probate law. Conversely, there are about 3 million Veterans being ill-served by Veterans Service Organization representatives. As I explain over and over, the Congressional Charter each of the 34 VSOs sign states they will help the VA adjudicate the Veterans claims.  38 CFR §14.632, on the other hand, commands an attorney or agent to diligently represent the Veteran to the best of his/her ability and sanctions can be applied for intransigence or stupidity. Very rarely will you read of an Agent charging money to file a claim or accepting Home Depot gift cards to get off his dead ass and do the job he was hired to do. Nor will you read about many attorneys who disremember your VA 9 has to be filed within 60 days of the SOC or SSOC.

I personally think the cadre of VA agents should be Veterans because they would be more familiar with the trials and tribulations of military service. However, I do know many who are not and their dedication to their job often exceeds even the zest and gusto of some VA attorneys.

Here is the Alan Gumpenberger Agent’s exam course presentation in Powerpoint from 2016 and the test questions most frequently asked. Alan didn’t have an answer key so I had to manufacture it myself. It took me two weeks of cross-checking to convince myself all the answers were correct. I began studying in earnest after the March 2016 Spring NOVA Conference and sat for the exam July 20th. I was informed I had passed August 2nd and began my practice four days later.

As for qualifications, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) will run a serious criminal background check on you. You must never have been convicted of any felonies. Obviously, drunk driving convictions don’t count or they would have tossed me for my 6/4/1969 post-graduation indiscretions and the other eight tickets that night for throwing missiles (eggs) at Officer Rohrbaugh, reckless driving, failure to heed 8 red lights, fifteen stop signs and doing 95 in a 35…up a one-way street the wrong way in Hampton/Newport News. I agreed to forgo college and signed up immediately for military service. Because I was 290% disabled, the OGC insisted I obtain a letter from my doctor stating I was capable of this endeavour and of sound mind. I suspect Dr. Lauer fudged his answer as to having a sound mind but I got his mom Aid and Attendance so it was a push.

Section8a_AgentsExam

Agents Practice Exam no answers

Answer Key

All the answers are in 38 CFR Part 1, 3, 4, 14, 19 and 20. There are no true, trick questions. Just read through each one to make sure you understand it. If you search for, and study, all these, you accidentally learn and remember each one. If you merely try to memorize the questions and their corresponding answers, you will not embed the knowledge in your brain.

I’m like the Starfish gal. I make a difference for as many Veterans as I can.

Make a difference in a Veteran’s life. Your reward will be immense. Happy Memorial Day to all and I wish to thank all you “starfish” who have allowed me to represent you over the years. VA Agents (and attorneys) do these dirty deeds- and dirt cheap I might add.

And that’s all I’m going to say about that.

 

Posted in 2016 NOVA Conference, All about Veterans, Humor, Memorial Day, NOVA Attorneys, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA Attorneys, Veterans Law, VSOs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

VAROs– MEAN MR. MUSTARD

The VA claims process continues to recede into a “Not It!” game. A rater will struggle to find some procedural stone left unturned and put the claim back in the National Work Queue (NWQ) hopper. Alternately, your claim becomes a figurative game of Keep Away where it is dispatched from one VARO to another every three days and suddenly sent back into the “499” Purgatory for weeks for a “further development” to make it once again Ready for Decision (RFD). On Ebenefits@VA.gov, that must look like imminent completion only to see two more miles tacked on to the claims tunnel. In that respect, eBenefits is about as reliable as a weatherman. 

From the Fort Sam Houston Memorial Veterans Service Center in the town of its namesake, we run into the ‘Not It!’ krewe ratings gurus. A simple request for SMC L for Aid and Attendance of another turns into, first, a denial which can only be seen as biased. After finding no way to overcome this roadblock, I withdrew the old claim for A&A and refiled it as a new reopen. I withdrew a half a dozen other claims for things that will never kill you. When you have two 100% scheduler ratings and numerous others which add up to almost another 100% in combined ratings, it’s generally an indicator that the Vet ate too much asbestos on the ship he served on. VA conceded the asbestos with the two 100%ers but disagrees with the myriad secondaries ratings. COPD, asthma, OSA, MDD, needs a fiduciary, narcolepsy and his wife quit work to take care of him. SMC L for A&A? Hellllllll no.

So, after Winston Salem denied,  I refiled. When you are pursuing SMC L and on up, it’s due and owing the day you can prove your entitlement. If I lose and immediately refile for the same thing, it’s a brand new reopen. If we win, we begin the argument of when   he first needed A&A.  This time Buffalo pulled it out of the NWQ hopper and re-re- reviewed it just for me-and agreed it was a “clean” denial. They sent it back out for a new opinion on all the mental aspects equaling a need for A&A and still came up with a denial.

All this VA poker got us on the other side of the February 19th, 2019 inception of the new Appeals Modernization Act or what has now been named the AMA. Prior to the February 14th, 2019 cutoff date, the RAMP option had no provision for the new filing of your NOD at the BVA. Think about this folks. If your NOD goes to the BVA and is reviewed by real juris doctorate attorneys, you’re getting a real shot at justice. The M 21 Magic 8 Ball is dang near always going to come up denied or lowball unless you’re missing parts and pieces. In certain claims, you will never prevail at the local level anyway. SMC is invariably that way. So are HCV jetgun claims.  VA refuses to give up without a fight to the BVA. With the new AMA, you get to Advance to BVA Boardwalk. It’s like you get a bye on the 16-month wait for the SOC/ VA 9 dance and another six to eight months to get it VAF 8 certified and off to the top shelf of the BVA closet  for a few years. Yes. I know. VA insists this might be as low as 4 months. I seem to remember the rollout of the FDC back in 2013. 98% accuracy, 125 days. If you like your VA doctor, you get to keep your VA doctor. The BVA is secretly praying all you Vets don’t take the BVA route as it will constipate an already overburdened appeals system.

I won’t touch the Higher Level of Review (HLR) Lane. It’s pointless. You could arrive with a Buddy letter from Jesus Christ Himself and notarized by none other than the Holy Ghost… and still lose at the HLR. Worse, it’s not going to be adjudicated by a GS 12-13 DRO. No sirreee, Bob. What have you been smoking? The term “Higher Level of Review” is all relative. If it was originally done by a green GS-9 step 4, “higher level” would be deemed the Legalzoom.com GS -10 step 1 who hired in last fall from GEICO. He did auto claims there for 3 years and saved them lots of money. His dad is probably a Congressman if you’re wondering.

The Supplemental Claims Lane (SCL) will be a necessary evil to get a claim reopened. But again, VA is merely going to use this opportunity to poke holes in your new and relevant evidence. Right off the top, who’s the arbiter of what constitutes “new and relevant”? Think about this. It’s like tennis. You serve a claim to them. It bounces and they wallop back a solid denial. You return the volley and file that new and relevant evidence to permit a second look at it. Bye-bye new and material evidence. You cannot present that at the BVA later. This gives VA oodles of time to figure out how to write up the denial and concoct some Hoodoo Voodoo gibberish in the denial.  You now need some new and relevant hand grenades pronto. Otherwise this is headed straight to jail and you lose a turn. Which is, incidentally, about where you would have (and could have) filed your NOD and appealed to the BVA anyway. It virtually eliminates a SOC, VA 9 and the VA Certification to the BVA.

If you lose at the BVA, you just run back to the Regional Office and refile a VAF 20-0995 and submit new and relevant evidence. The important thing to always keep foremost in your VA claims/appeal plans is to always hold back some N&R evidence in the event you may need it. We’re in a whole new adjudications world that benefits us greatly assuming the new parameters are well-funded and well-staffed. If there are not enough warm bodies to dissolve the megamillion appeals still waiting, this may not fly. But when you think about it, hiring about 2000 GS-14 staff attorneys and using them like VLJs 24/7/365 just might eradicate the horrendous backlog. I, for one, am optimistic.

Posted in Appeals Modernization Act, BvA Decisions, BvA HCV decisions, Humor, KP Veterans, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA RAMP, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

DAN MOSER–KNOCKING ON HEAVEN’S DOOR

This is a poignant day for all Vietnam Veterans. Imagine having to pick a day and imbue it with great pomp and circumstance. May 5th, 1975 represents the last (official) day of the Vietnam War. We Veterans of the conflict remember it as a day that will live in ignominy. Why, just ask Sen. Richard “Bien Hoa” Blumenthal of Connecticut. I’m sure he has tragic memories from his tour of duty there. I see Mayor Pete Buttigieg threw his hat into  the presidential ring and is even writing a book about his heroic exploits (sans CIB) in Afstan. Should be a good read. The problem with a book now is elementary-it doesn’t allow you to revise your military history later on like Blumenthal.

From what I hear, the conflict of naming May 5th Vietnam Veterans Day instead of  the improbable choice of March 29th was simple. Our esteemed President noted in 2012 that May 5th was already taken by that venerable United States National Holiday known as Cinco de Mayo. Yes, you might hear some sarcasm dripping from that sentence. My apologies. That was probably uncalled for. I cringe to think what would have happened if July 4th had already been spoken for as National Monarch Butterfly Cocoon Day and President Jackson, fifty years later had been forced to choose January 10th for our Independence Day celebration because it hadn’t been “spoken for” yet.  Idiot’s delight. I guess you can understand my unbridled 46-year old cynicism to this day when the VFW told me to sashay on over at the American Legion in Lancaster, California to apply for membership in 1973 because “Vietnam is a conflict, son, not a War. You don’t qualify for membership here.” Funny thing is they’ve been hounding me since I hit 100% in 2008 to join. Gee, you don’t think VA sells their mailing lists, do you?

Sadly, being disenfranchised Vietnam Vets, this was our fate for decades.  It makes no difference to me now that America has suddenly and collectively noticed the forgotten yellow ribbons around the old oak trees and the neglected mention of us taking a Bronze Medal at the Southeast Asian Olympics. I get that. It’s embarrassing to get your American ass kicked in any war. However, suddenly recognizing your faux pas 40 years later doesn’t ameliorate the animosity we returned to. And that’s all I’m going to say about that… today. You can take your Welcome Home Finally shit and stick it. Acclamation delayed is Acclimation denied in my febrile mind.

Dan Moser

This post is to commemorate the passing of my recently deceased friend, client and fellow Vietnam Veteran Wayne “Dan” Moser. Dan and his wife Signe were real estate clients of Cupcake’s and it was a natural fit. His VFW service rep insisted Dan was maxed out on VA benefits at 100%. No mention of Special Monthly Compensation was ever uttered. When I apprised him of his entitlement to so much more, he was initially doubtful such a thing existed. He didn’t call bullshit on me. He just felt no one who considered himself a friend would betray him on something so important. Such is the high quality of VSO training. I leave it to the reader to ascertain whether this was intentional or just a gross oversight due to Montana VFW legal inexpertise. Considering the difference between 100% ($3,227.58) versus SMC R1 ($7,798.09) is about $4,500 and some change, I’m surprised someone didn’t scratch their head and ask them queshuns.

Sensei Chisholm

This is exactly why I chose SMC, Agent Orange Presumptives and Hepatitis C to specialize in. Very few (if any) VSOs even begin to comprehend (or admit) the intricacies and nuances of them. Unfortunately, this lack of understanding also plagues seasoned legal minds who do this for a living. I owe my understanding to the acknowledged master of the art- Robert Chisholm of Chisholm, Chisholm and Kirkpatrick. He was doing this before I even knew what a 4138 was back in 1989.

 

Signe and Dan

Dan Moser was the poster child for R1 and wasn’t even aware of it. I’m glad I was able to help. His funeral and interment was April 26th, 2019 here in Washington State at Tahoma National Cemetery. I have been to far too many funerals for my fallen comrades and I dreaded this one but wild horses couldn’t have dragged me away. Even if I had not been extended an invitation, I would probably have still been there in the background incognito.  It’s a rare honor to be able to do so much for one family. His daughter Cindy may well become  my next new Moser project.

It was also an opportunity to meet his daughters including Leona and son-in-law Ed Dunn. Funny how this works. Ed was in line for an R1 rating too but no one told him. I leave it to the reader to ascertain whether this was intentional or just a gross oversight due to Arkansas VFW legal inexpertise. Considering the difference between 100% ($3,227.58) versus SMC R1 ($7,798.09) is about $4,500 and some change, I’m surprised someone didn’t scratch their head and ask them queshuns. Wait a minute. This is beginning to feel like deja vu.

Ed’s already lost the use of his lower extremities from rheumatoid arthritis and now, sadly it’s destroyed his use of his hands. And on top of loss of use of four extremities, he needs aid and attendance.  His erstwhile VSO is probably wondering what happened to those all-but-guaranteed annual membership dues they’ve had in the bag all these years.

Ed opted in to the Army as an 11 Bravo 10 and managed to pick up a Combat Infantryman Badge during his tour in Vietnam. This whole family has borne the battle and then some.

Ed Dunn, 11 Bravo with CIB/ son-in-law of Dan Moser with author.

Imagine two generations of the same family serving in Vietnam. Wait! I almost forgot my Dad (7/66 to 3/68) and me ( 5/70 to 5/72) did the same.  I”m sure it’s fairly rare but still speaks volumes about our mutual devotion to our country.

Below is a group photo of the Moser clan. I almost feel like thanking the Veterans Administration for making me adjudicate my claims for 30 years. Were it not for their intransigence, I would not have learned the art of VA poker nor would I have had the honor of representing Dan and then his wife Signe- let alone Ed and Leona Dunn. Howard works in strange ways.

(L to R) The Moser family ( Cindy, Signe, Leona, author and Denise

Speaking of getting into a pickle, the latest Pickle Report- 16 lbs and counting as of Friday last. She’s like a F3 tornado and growing inexorably. I cannot even imagine trying to do this in ten years. At 68, it’s like a brand new baby except for pee pads and the dog food. Those dark circles under my eyes are from lack of sleep.  Taking her for a walk is a piece of cake. Simply take a leash and drag it behind you. She’s on it faster than a small mouth bass on a #2 Mepps® Spinner in June. She takes you for a walk.

Taking the tractor for a walk.

Pickles does seem to have a factory defect that disturbs me. I’m pretty sure Cupcake would forbid me returning her as damaged goods at this late date but her tail is a decidedly different color about half-way down. I’m thinking about taking her down to Sherwin Williams Paint Store tomorrow to get a color match. Click below on the pic for a close up. This isn’t photo shopped.

Wardrobe malfunction

Last but not least, I finally hornswoggled a SOC for my long-lost greenhouse out of my arch nemesis VR&E Officer over in Seattle on Friday. That must be a world record. I filed on 10/10/2018. It only took two calls to the White House Hotline and the threat of another Extraordinary Writ (#4) Hallelujah! I can now opt in to the new AMA and proceed to the Board of Veterans Appeals. I’m hoping to be able to get Veterans Law Judge Vito Clementi again for a Travel Board hearing for the proper size.

This ought to be a hoot. I’m counsel for, as well as, appellant. This time I’m flying to DC for the hearing. This is like playing VA poker with 3rd graders. Ol’ Brer Boyd (fox) and Brer Crosby (bear) barely know how to screw you out of VR&E benefits but litigation is definitely not their strong suit. Google ‘post hoc rationalizations advanced for the first time on review of agency actions are entitled to no consideration’. Check out my old friend Martin v. Occupational Safety

Graham Greenhouse SOC redact

I’m pretty sure I  know what’s at the top of the Labrador Retriever food pyramid….H2O coming out of a hose. I showed Pickles this magic and now every hose on the 5 acres has to be carefully inspected…daily.

 

 

 

Asknod what your country can do for you

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in All about Veterans, AO, Independent Living Program, KP Veterans, Milestones, SMC, Stolen Valor, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA Attorneys, Vietnam War history, VSOs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

EASTER TRICK OR TREAT AT THE VA

No, I’m not a conspiracy freak. I do not’ subscribe to Chemtrails Today or Deep State Magazine. I instead prefer light humor and get the news feed from the VAOIG Monthly “Highlights”. How about that discovery that all those VA whistleblowers (thinking they are anonymous) just discovered their bosses are the ones looking into their allegations of wrongdoing? Is that a hoot or what? That’s even richer than State’s Attorney Kim Foxx “colloquially recusing” herself from the Smollett hen house massacre. But wait. There’s more here at the VA that bears close examination.

(revised 1633 Hrs PDT; 4/24/19 @ 1001 Hrs PDT)

Having played VA poker for nigh on thirty years, I have watched the revamping of the denial process. It’s evolving like the cell phone. VA justice was crude like the old Motorola brick phones in the beginning. However, they were dual use. You could grip that rubber ducky antenna and use it like a blackjack when some chowderhead tried to steal your favorite red baseball cap. Unfortunately, you couldn’t whack a Veterans Law Judge upside the head. Unlike the old phones, now we can surreptitiously record video and conversations and bust folks doing what they insist they weren’t. We can also review a claims file and discover what we were never meant to see.

After the War of 1812, the Govt. found itself knee-deep in Veterans. Some method had to be invented to fence the malingerers and trailer trash out. This gave birth to the “acute but resolved before separation” excuse. It was lethal to claims but eventually, someone (the CAVC) spilled the beans in Caluza v Brown. Read it. From then on the acute and resolved gig declined in popularity at the VBA. Eventually, with the advent of social justice and real law, the Board of Veterans Appeals was forced to appear “equitable” and begin paying more than lip service to terms like “equipoise” and “presumption of soundness”. I actually toss in a blurb at the end of my briefs and insist on the benefit of the doubt. Of course, I use fancypants words like:

Appellant feels the appeal is in equipoise and asks for the time-honored pro-Veteran canon of statutory construction most recently espoused in Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S.428, 441 (2011) (“We have long applied the canon that provisions for benefits to members of the Armed Services are to be construed in the beneficiaries’ favor.”). The pro-Veteran canon instructs that provisions providing benefits to veterans should be liberally construed in the veterans’ favor, with any interpretative doubt resolved to their benefit. See, e.g., King v. St. Vincent’s Hosp., 502 U.S. 215, 220 (1991). The Supreme Court first articulated this canon in Boone v. Lightner to reflect the sound policy that we must “protect those who have been obliged to drop their own affairs to take up the burdens of the nation.” 319 U.S. 561, 575 (1943). This same policy underlies the entire veterans benefit scheme. Barrett v. Principi, 363 F.3d 1316, 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (“[T]he veterans benefit system is designed to award entitlements to a special class of citizens, those who risked harm to serve and defend their country. This entire scheme is imbued with special beneficence from a grateful sovereign.”

Perhaps it was Bill Clinton (I’m not sure on this one) who said “If you cain’t impress them with your alleged intelligence, baffle them with bullshit and jokes about how you didn’t inhale”. My point is I use every judicial tool at my disposal like a Bullshit button to combat this mayhem at the 57 Fort Fumbles across the fruity plains. And I have amassed plenty. I have a folder for briefs with all my Killer Cites to deflate bogus VA allegations and “findings of fact”.

What concerns me most is a growing trend in adjudications. I speak of the new (relatively) National Work Queue (NWQ). I created the analogy of a giant Lotto hopper with all the VA claims numbers in it and an air jet to swirl them around for the TV cameras. It begins thusly:

  1. Insert claim at the EIC in Cheeseville.
  2.  VA ‘technician” (and I use the term loosely) removes the claim from the tumbler and tries to decypher whatever it is you are claiming. After typing it up and assigning an End Product code (EP 020) in M 21-ese, s/he reinserts it back into the tumbler.
  3.   Yet another techie removes it several weeks later and decides if you need a medical c&p exam. And then throws it back into the hopper.
  4. You get a notification several weeks later to report  to QTC/LHI/VES or you local VAMC to be examined for these “alleged” illnesses/injuries.
  5. Three months later, the exam results are uploaded into your claims file. And here is where the new travesty of justice ensues. But first-back to the tumbler. Remember, I have only discussed five steps so far but more than 20 VA techies have put their fingerprints on this baby by now.
  6. A rater (#1) now “develops the claim”. By that, I mean they use OCR text recognition to cruise through mounds of VAMC CAPRI hospital paperwork, your VAMC files, your Service Treatment Records and anything you submitted. So, what happens if you’re like me- a Vietnam era Vet with a lot of hand-written records? Well, pilgrim, you’re plumb screwed to be honest. They haven’t taught cursive writing in 10 or more years. Worse, even if you were adroit at reading cursive, you’d need an advanced primer on reading contemporary doctors’ chicken scratch. Those VA techies blow this chapter off and proceed merrily on to getting it “Ready for Decision”.
  7. Finally, about the magic 125-day point, someone looks at the suspense date for cranking out a decision. Ready or not, here s/he comes with your M 21-derived rating. As we know, 85% will be denied. Often, this is the 3rd or 4th rater to begin the “promulgate decision” mode. Usually, they discover they’ve forgotten something and it has to be “reworked” to ensure it’s wrong. There’s a lot of this. The Houston rater knows it’s a shit show. S/he would rather find some minute error and stick it back in the tumbler for the VSR in Winston Salem to put out. It’s a game of ‘Not it!’.
  8. With the new AMA claims system, you now need either a sympathetic ear at the Higher Level of Review (HLR) venue or some most excellent new and relevant evidence to submit to the Supplemental Claims Lane. You can also go to the BVA and proceed to what we used to call a Notice of Disagreement based on the fact that the cursive handwriting was never part of the real record even though the rater said it was. I’ve given up at the Regional level other than to file the claim. In fact, I make no pretense of submitting any evidence. Why bother? Why not let them hamburger it first?

There’s another ploy to consider. If VA denies first off, then you can fulfill what you’re lacking and cure it. If they come back and deny on a different theory from the original one, why, that’s a post hoc rationalization  (see Martin v. Occ. Safety and Health  Council). Litigating positions are accorded no deference if they are merely post hoc rationalizations for prior Agency actions advanced for the first time on appeal.) You’ll see VA do this frequently and no one catches it. What gives?

The new VA claims technique is more subtle. The M 21 seems to have been reprogrammed to allow raters to ignore what appears to be exculpatory evidence and rely entirely on what the M 21 copier spits out into the ‘printing complete’ tray. Gone are the good old days of one rater (not 50) taking your file home with him at night and reading it after dinner. S/he would develop it from beginning to end and provide a rational answer. Yes, Virginia, there were problems with this like the Friday the 13th (July) 1973 NPRC barbecue on the sixth floor that magically burnt up records which wouldn’t be archived there for a decade or more. Worse, they sometimes float to the surface of the VBMS 40 years later when someone finally notices nobody ever actually wrote back to the NPRC  and asked for the STRs back in ’73. This is becoming the frequent “oh-so-rare CUE error” we were told about in Fugo v. Brown.

Essentially, the NWQ is modeled after the Detroit auto assembly model. As the car moves down the assembly line, VA ‘installers” complete preliminary tasks like c&p exams, pseudo research via Wikipaedia™, trying to ascertain if you “stepped foot” in Vietnam, if you smoked cigarettes to defeat lung cancer presumptives, denial if your dad had Parkinson’s so you had a genetic proclivity for it, etc. Instead of one comprehensive examination of all the assembled evidence and a truly exhausting review of the potential for extending the benefit of the doubt, we now have upwards of 50 yayhoos with their fingerprints all over your file from Buffalo to San Diego-before a decision is even made. And, like Detroit, if they forgot to associate the SSD records with your TDIU claim, it goes down in flames. Advance token to Go and lose a turn for remand.

It used to be we could call up our local Puzzle Palace and ask what they were smoking when they denied our claims (or our clients’ claims). Now I have to have access to the VBMS to see who was last assigned the claim/appeal in the Notes section. I have to call up the Change Management Agent (CMA) who serves attys/agents at the offending VARO and have him ask the rater to please call me or explain how they arrived at such a flawed conclusion. I usually get a polite email answer saying ” Well,  I asked for you and the rater looked it over but they are unable to grant. Fortunately for your client, he has innumerable options to seek a higher level of review ad nauseum. Please thank him/her for their service.”

There was a time we could barter over the phone or in person in the RO’s cafeteria (no recording devices permitted). They didn’t frisk you for a wire but it was almost that bad. If push came to shove, they’d deny it was them and the recording was fabricated. Those days are lost and gone forever. VA’s theme song is Paranoia Big Destroyer. So, too is the much-vaunted DRO hearing. At best, I can get a “higher level of review ” rater to call me back and almost pretend to listen to my diatribe. Pretend is the operable word here.

For all you attorneys and agents- beware the “Supplemental Claims Lane (SCL)”. As the name implies, this characterizes the old NOD in a new light. It is a new claim for all intents and VA’s purposes so newsflash-no 20% for a win. That will require a HLR or a trip to the BVA to get your baksheesh.

Now for a new scam. You have an IMO, You foolishly send it in with your shiny new claim. Well, boy howdy this ought to speed things up, right? Not. Va promptly goes out and finds a VA proctologist to opine on your TBI symptoms and you get the resultant “Unfortunately we are unable to grant your claim(s). The VA Examiner got a big bang out of your IMO but we determined ours was far more probative because we-unlike your doctor- read the claims file.” If they’d done their homework, they’d see your 3288 requesting the c-file and know that was part and parcel of the IMO data reviewed. Fat chance of that happening.

So, you think you’re smarter than the average bear and send the IMO in as a Supplemental claim. VA is now sending these to the Black Hole or the Appeals Management Center (AMC), renamed the Appeals Management Office (AMO) and now the Appeals Resource Center (ARC). Six of one and half a dozen of another. The last and newest name reflects the truth. They analyze the IMO for a weak spot and illegally shoot it down. We solved this problem initially with the ‘vague’ Mariano v. Principi  argument that you cannot deny if a Vet has all three elements necessary for a grant-i.e. 1)disease/injury/presumptive in service, 2) same thing now; and 3) the golden IMO. Fortunately, the CAVC came back and clarified that in Hart v. Mansfield. Here’s my killer cite for cut and paste in the brief.

Mariano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305, 312 (2003) held that it “would not be permissible for VA to undertake such additional development if a purpose was to obtain evidence against an appellant’s case.” Id. (emphasis added). This single sentence, although rendered without further explanation, states a broad, general proposition, that was revisited by the Court in Hart v. Mansfield, 21 Vet.App. 505, 508 (2007). Hart stated that additional development is not permitted “if the purpose was to obtain evidence against the claim,” and further noted that if the evidence was insufficient to make a decision on the claim, then the Secretary was required to obtain a medical examination.

For every VA denial, there’s usually a regulation or a precedental Federal case cite that will eviscerate it. Finding that sucker is the challenge. If you have Westlaw at $59 a minute, you’re loaded for bear. If not and you are a DIY pro se Vet, I’d use the BVA decisions for my cites. I did it for decades during my battles and it paid off handsomely. The repair order for an 86’d IMO is Hart supra (above). To avoid this conundrum of IMOs that are dead on arrival, I now only submit them to the BVA. There, they are received as real incontrovertible evidence and never rebutted. The BVA is constipated with a gazillion appeals. Hand a Veterans Law Judge a giftwrapped appeal w/ IMO and it’s a chicken dinner winner every time.

I find half the battle is reading the denial decision in excruciating detail. Take each sentence apart and analyze it for what it says- or more importantly-what it doesn’t say. If it sounds like bullshit, it probably is. No. Let me rephrase that advice. Most are bull shit and have no basis in VA law or congressional statute. VA is big on mission creep. The more they deny, the bolder they become.

Please do not read this as a screed against VA raters. It isn’t their fault. They are handed a file and expected to come up with a decision-more often wrong than right- in a very short time. Worse, they were not able to become acquainted with it and see incongruities that would jump out and bite a seasoned law dog’s eyeballs. The mantra seems to be “I trust everything done by my compadres before this ended up in my in-basket.” This is how the Challenger’s frozen O-rings escaped detection. This is how Apollo 13 ended up in a world of shit 200,00 miles from home. Assume nothing. How many times have you heard the plaint “I didn’t know it was loaded. It’s not my fault _____ is dead.”

I pride myself on not presuming I know everything. I recognize I’m not perfect so I review my work to the point of redundancy. I play Devil’s advocate and take the VA’s side of the claim to determine if I can find glaring flaws. This is what every Rainmaker should do. Just because you have a Juris Doctorate and the word Esquire after your name (I don’t) doesn’t give you a bye on intelligence. Remember, VA raters do not have anything close to a JD and many create denial logic out of whole cloth. They rely on you swallowing their hooey hook, line and sinker. Therein lies the fabled 98% accuracy claims they tout. You, or your VSO reps do not appeal 98% of the time-ipso facto, they (VA) are right 98% of the time.

And that’s all I’m going to say about that.

Posted in All about Veterans, AMC or ARC, Appeals Modernization Act, C-Files and RBAs, Humor, Independent Medical Opinions, KP Veterans, Presumption of Soundness, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA Attorneys, VBMS Tricks | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VA EXAMINERS–CHARTER MEMBERS OF THE FLAT EARTH SOCIETY

I’m sorry I’ve been remiss. I have been a slave to the typewriter attempting to cure the misguided proclivities of VA raters across our rapidly fruiting plains this spring. It seems there is something in the water or left-handed tobacco has been legalized and they aren’t being dope-tested. Jez, where do I start today? Ahh, of course. All of you folk must be into that new business gig  LinkedUp®, right? About six times a day, I get an update to “Congratulate Bob on his reaching 90 days sober at Astin Mechanical.” My new influizers (sp?) are Honey BooBoo and Michael Avenatti. I was searched for 5 times last week by huge corporations who might want to buy me?  Cupcake signed me up on LinkedUp™ so I have no idea what she said about me. Look me up. I’m in the icloud somewhere. I have accountants who pay for it all.

Pickles has now doubled in weight to 11 lbs this AM. Puppy breath is still there.

 

I got my ass whipped by a couple of losses I didn’t see coming but this is what  we have to endure at the regional level. Always remember this is an insurance company. The  VA’s fisc is a clear responsibility they look at like the Huns (Veterans with alleged disabilities) at the Gate.  I draw the line when they start coming up with the following sleight of hand. Imagine you’re rated for two separate things-in the instant case here- TBI and PTSD. They’re two separate “disorders”- DC 8045 @70% and DC 9411@50%. They might share one or two overlapping symptoms but they generally have two entirely separate sets of “conditions”. Remember those descriptive nouns for mental “issues”.

Now grant some other increases to a banged up body like 50% for headaches and 10% for tinnitus for TBI they somehow overlooked for 50 years and…oh-oh…jez, he’ll be entitled to SMC S. Can’t have that. Quick, conflate two ‘disorders’ into one and disappear the PTSD into thin air. Yes, ladies and gentlemen. A rater pulled off this amazing trick of prestidigitation and then had the balls to say the VA, in its munificence, wouldn’t be filing to recoup the overpayment to the Veteran for the last 4 years.

Actually, the language in DC 8045 says rate the TBI shit under TBI and rate the bent brain shit under PTSD. That’s to avoid pyramiding. And here, the rater gets points for trying to bullshit a bullshitter. He gets plumb amusing for attempting to”reintegrate” two disorders into one. Reintegrate?

Well, hush my mouth. I thought it was a sub silentio reduction in rating.  I went on a writing jag and cranked out the most excellent rebuttal to an SSOC in all my years. Most times I wouldn’t get all in a tizzy and just take it to the BVA. Welcome to the new AMA folks.  That’s what we’re doing now. This was written, not for the 70 IQ GS 13 Booth Bitch in Jackson, Miss but for the edification of a learned Veterans Law Judge and his staff counsel.

Rebuttal of SSOC redacted

Now, if that wasn’t the biggest error they hoped no one would ever unravel, how about the same story in a different town a month earlier. This time, the Vet has a mess of 10s, 20s, and 30%ers along with a total loss of rt hand. The army operated on it to fix a finger. Five surgeries later, the hand was a feeder claw like on a lobster. The army sent him packing with 60% for the hand instead of 70%. Uh-oh. 1993 CUE. Well, they ignored the CUE and took away a 26 year rating of 10% and a 9-year rating of 10% (20% total) saying it was, well, nonsymptomatic dude and we can’t pay you if the boo boo got all better, now can we? And besides, we gave you 30% for your hip right before we took the 20% away. Since we really didn’t reduce your rating by 86ing the antique rating, you’re still at 80% instead of 90%. And oh, by the way, that TDIU? Nope. We tried but we couldn’t swing it with you only being 80% rated and all.

If you go down into the Go To Work section in the VBMS, you see the deferrals flying back and forth.

Rater #1: Increasing hip to 30% with increase in Left ankle results in 95% combined rating. Refer back to coach.

Coach: Add scars up. Do they equal 6″²? o%. Also. we have a problem. Veteran’s agent has access to VBMS and can see we’re fixing to screw him on a protected rating. You have my authority to promulgate. Screw the agent.

So here we go. The VA rater blithely takes 26-yr. old antique painful scar rating(s) and conflates all the scars into square footage. Uh-oh. You need six square inches to get to 10%. Way missed it by thaaaaaat much.

As for that pesky CUE, he’s right All the PULHES scores at entry were 1 across the board. The exit has a 5 on it for upper. Screw it. Call him left handed now and confirm the rating of the non-dominant (formerly right handed) hand at 60%. Next?

I can’t make this shit up. This is what happens when you have to crank out 10 decisions a day or get demoted. Or, God forbid, screwed out of your bonus Performance Pay Incentive Allowance.

Here’s my answer to dufus in Houston who has no idea how to spell 38 CFR:

Redacted CUE NOD pdf

Remember, if you are the CUE guy, you are a “movant. Otherwise you’re a claimant or an appellant. When you file an Ex Writ at the Court, you are a petitioner.

P.S. Here’s a little something  you and your buds could cook up this weekend.

Posted in 1154(b) combat presumptions, 3.156(c), Agent Orange, All about Veterans, C&P exams, CUE, Earlier Effective dates, Humor, KP Veterans, Reductions in rating, SOCs and SSOCs, VA Agents, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments