CAVC–TYRUES v SHINSEKI- PART TROIS?

Welcome to Larry’s ping pong game. Larry’s been playing this one since 1998. He lost here back in 2009 and took it upstairs to the FED Circus. They piddled around with it and got into a big diatribe about the Henderson concept of the inviolability of the 120 day rule on NOAs.

The Court has neatly sidestepped that issue and moved on to the separability of a claim argued under the theory of two distinctly different theories. Schroeder and Clemons gave us the precedent that a claim argued under two separate theories is still one claim and cannot be bifurcated into two disparate ones. That much is established law. Tyrues attempts to do an end run around this with the novel precedental theory that a claim for one disease/injury on a direct basis can also be considered a separate one for a presumptive illness. Once divided, both (rather than just the original one) must be appealed within the prescribed times dictated by the Court.

Judge Lance ably articulated his dissent (with Judge Schoelen) thus:

Thus, it is entirely possible for a claimant to diligently contest his or her claim only to discover that he or she has forfeited part of it because it is not obvious to a lay person that a Board decision must be appealed immediately when part of a claim has been remanded for further consideration. However, the solution to protecting diligent claimants is not to sub silentio overrule this Court’s decision by applying equitable tolling in the absence of evidence. Rather, it is to simply base our decision on a realistic expectation of diligence on the part of claimants who lack attorneys to advise them. Accordingly, the Supreme Court’s decision to remand this matter for further consideration in light of Henderson v. Shinseki, 131 S.Ct. 1197 (2011), highlights one of the central flaws of the majority opinion.

Tyrues v. Shinseki (2012) (Tyrues II)

This is interesting law insofar as Larry was pro se for a good portion of the claim up to the filing (late) with CAVC. The Supremes kicked it back using 120 day Henderson logic as I mentioned but the ensuing argument has now devolved into whether he filed before Henderson (he did). Based on that, he loses.

More importantly is the argument vis a vis bifurcation. I filed in 1994 for Porphyria as a) directly a secondary of HCV or b) due to Agent Orange. The Seattle RO ruled narrowly that I was never in Vietnam (ergo no presumptive exposure) but ignored the premise based on the Hepatitis. They do that a lot at all ROs. Don’t feel pregnant and alone.

Larry here has hit the wall in a similar situation. He filed under two separate theories but the BVA denied on one and remanded the other for more development. You and I, being rather unsophisticated, would probably interpret this as a a claim partially denied and another bite at the apple on theory #2. You and I would be very shit out of luck according to the CAVC as of August 23rd. There isn’t much difference between his situation and mine. However, the RO didn’t turn mine into TWO separate claims. Actually they never finished the second half of it in 1994. They just ignored theory #2.

Larry was ultimately denied the second hypothesis and filed his NOA. The Court said “Too late” and that’s what provoked this ping pong game. After turning several magnificent old growth trees into pulp for this project, we are now at the beginning of what will probably represent a new assault at the 3rd Fed. Cir. Larry is getting old. He’s got 14 years into this project. To give up now would be to acknowledge that the VA is right. I don’t think he will.

If the VA is permitted to take a claim and convert it into whatever they say they think you were “attempting” to file for (often referred to as construing), we are in deep doo-doo. They currently do this all the time. On the other hand, taking the claim and making two claims out of one based on separate theories is spooky. What’s to prevent a prosecutor from charging you with the crime of murder for one corpse. If he fails on that theory, can he then get a remand and a do over on the second theory? Doesn’t double jeopardy enter in here somewhere? Equitable estoppel anyone?

Larry has a long row to hoe and I smell trouble. The longer this festers the less justice will be dispensed and a desire to move on judicially will take root. What it portends to pro se Vets is a legal nightmare. When is a claim a claim? When is a claim actually two disparate claims  based on two different concepts. Who gets to decide? Do they have to tell you or are you supposed to learn Braille? All these queshuns.

Posted in CAVC/COVA Decision, Fed. Cir. & Supreme Ct., Important CAVC/COVA Ruling | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

Say no to drugs. Any drugs. Share this with all your animals.

 

C’mon, Ralphie. It’s my turn. You’re bogarting it and goobering up the end with slobber. How come I always get seconds?

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SVR RADIO APPEARANCE @ 1200 HRS CDT TODAY

Just got the invite at the last moment. See you there or you can listen to the archived version later if you miss it. It will be available at Hadit.com. A warm thank you to JBASSER and all the excellent Vet helpers over there for making this happen. 

P.S. Update.

Gerrel and the boys at Hadit.com are a wonderful bunch. Why wouldn’t they be? Veterans as a subset of the American citizenry have always been the first to role up their sleeves and get things done with the assets at hand. We don’t require long delays with Environmental Impact Statements. We don’t do feasibility studies that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. We don’t congregate in warm places like Orlando and beat it to death with our lips. Much like that famous Veteran Alexander the Great, we cut the Gordian knot and proceed to git ‘er done. The gentlemen I met today are movers and shakers. They epitomize the theory that sitting on your hands is not an option. I thank them profusely for the invitation and hope I passed the audition.

Posted in All about Veterans, ASKNOD BOOK, NEW BOOK | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VETS BEING “UNFAIR” ABOUT FILING CLAIMS

Here’s an interesting take on why we have such a humongous backlog. Blame the internet. If all those Vets returning from Iraqistan would quit filing three page lists we could eliminate it (the backlog) next year. Hellooooo? Nobody told us to run out and do it when we returned to the world in 1970. Nobody said boo. Most were lucky if they got a separation physical in the cattle drive for the Main gate to get off base. Now we are informed that these greedy Vets are just gaming the system with a heap of claims filings. Not good. This is why we’ll never get out from under the backlog- in 2015 or 2020. The process has to change to paperless and the protocol has to be one of grant obvious claims now and do an audit (a la Filner) soon to confirm. When you come home missing a piece of scalp from an IED, it shouldn’t take 16 months to confirm you didn’t cut your scalp shaving. If you come home and tend to sleep in the bathtub with a .45 ACP , it’s safe to say you have  some bent brain box issues that need resolution. Sure, Vets fake symptoms to get compensation or so it is said. But seriously-all of us? Everyone of us has to be put under a microscope and examined for credulity? They trusted you with guns, hand grenades and Big Boy toys for 4 years but you might be cheating to get $350.00 a month? Member Bob sends me this explanation:

Army Times
September 3, 2012 
Pg. 8

Complicated Claims Slow Down VA Payments

Backlog stands near 867,000; average wait time hits 257 days

By Rick Maze

More complex disability claims filed by new veterans and supplemental claims for increased benefits appear to be the major factors in the large and still growing backlog of unprocessed claims.

Veterans Affairs Department officials have cited complexity as one reason for a backlog of 866,928 compensation and pension claims piled up at its regional offices, including 575,711 that are more than 125 days old.

VA data shows that Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans are averaging slightly more than nine disability issues per claim, far more than any other generation of veterans since World War II.

Gerald Manar of Veterans of Foreign Wars said he has seen claims with up to 75 separate disability issues — and has heard of one that lists 125 disabilities.

“It looks like some people are going through their medical and personnel records and writing down every time they went to the clinic and every time they saw a corpsman, for a splinter or for something more serious, because they don’t want to leave anything out,” said Manar, deputy director of VFW’s national veterans service.

More medical problems

Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are filing claims with more total disabilities for several reasons, Manar said.

For one thing, these wars have seen much greater use of National Guard and reserve troops than earlier conflicts. Reservists “tend to be older than their active-duty counterparts, making them more subject to wear and tear on their bodies,” Manar said.

He also noted that many troops deployed multiple times to Iraq or Afghanistan or both, while most Vietnam vets — whose claims average less than six disability issues — deployed for one year and then left active duty.

“More deployments means they are subject to greater opportunity to be exposed to [improvised explosive devices] and other hazards,” he said. “The greater time deployed, the greater opportunity for injury.” Joe Violante of Disabled American Veterans said another factor in claims complexity is outreach.

“When I got out, I barely knew what benefits were available. Today, there is a big difference in awareness,” said Violante, DAV’s national legislative director and a Marine Corps veteran who left service in 1972.

Pre-separation briefings are making troops smarter about getting service-connected medical conditions documented in their records, Violante said.

“I really don’t think they are whiners,” he said. “These are people doing what they should, and what has been recommended to them, so they can receive the benefits they have earned.” The general rise in awareness also is reaching veterans of earlier generations with medical problems they may not have thought of as service-connected.

Violante said one Vietnam vet recently called DAV for help on finding a private doctor to work on an artificial limb “because the duct tape he’d been using wasn’t working anymore.” The veteran was surprised to learn VA would help him — if only he would ask.

Neither Violante nor Manar said he believes an increase in mental health-related issues is a major reason Iraq- and Afghanistan-era vets are filing more claims.

That in itself “is not a reason for the backlog,” Violante said. “We know about 20 percent of returning veterans have reported mental health issues, but that is just one of the many disabilities they appear to be claiming.”

A sharp spike

Since 2001, claims received by VA have jumped 94 percent, with 1.3 million received in fiscal 2011. VA records also show the number of people involved in processing claims has risen 97 percent over the same period.

Of 866,928 benefits claims pending as of Aug. 18, 37 percent were new. The rest were supplemental claims, mostly from people already getting disability benefits seeking to increase their ratings by adding disabilities or showing their disabilities had worsened.

Only 31 percent of original claims in the backlog are from Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans; 30 percent are from Vietnam-era veterans or survivors, 19 percent from veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War and the rest from other generations.

VA records show processing time is slowing. In 2001, the average time to complete a claim was 181 days; that’s now 257 days.

Accuracy on claims decisions also has regressed. In 2001, VA had an 81 percent accuracy rate. VA officials said the rate improved to a peak of 90 percent in 2006 but has slipped to 86 percent today.

Violante said he doesn’t put much faith in VA’s pledge to begin reducing the backlog by 2015.

“We’ve seen a change in mindset in the top leadership of VA to get something done, but I don’t believe the culture that has allowed the backlog to grow has changed,” he said.

Despite some improvements, Manar said, “It still looks like it will be more than 20 years before the backlog is eliminated.”

Complex claims

One reason the Veterans Affairs Department’s backlog of pending disability claims has remained high is that veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the 1991 Persian Gulf War, are filing more complicated claims, listing more medical problems, than veterans of earlier conflicts. The average number of medical conditions per disability claim, by conflict era:

Iraq/Afghanistan wars: 9.14

1991 Persian Gulf War: 7.53

Vietnam War: 5.21

Korean War: 3.84

World War II: 3.71

SOURCE: Veterans Affairs Department staff

So, gentle reader. What can we take away from this? I see a lot of Vietnam claims (30%) from where I stand. vA insists that the AO balloon has passed through and is waning on the new presumptives. I strongly disagree. What I see is knowledge of how to do this growing among eligible Vietnam Vets and a growing awareness that their sickness can be attributed to disease/injury in that war. VSOs are also instrumental in that older Vets from as far back as the Korean Boundary Dispute are joining fraternal organizations and being apprised of their eligibility for NSC pensions and the like. Add in widows of Vets from WW2 forward and you have a rush to the feed trough. Congress mandated these benefits so those who avail themselves of it shouldn’t be considered greedy.

By serving, we earned certain rights. We shouldn’t be painted as greedy money grubbers for acting on it. That’s pretentious. We certainly should not face the opprobrium of the vA for this. Blame the politicians for their bellicose behaviour-not the unfortunate Vet who is the collateral damage.

Here’s an example of a cattle drive to the Main gate. PTSD? No way, dude. It’s antisocial personality w/ passive aggressive tendencies. Coughing up blood? Too many smokes. Painful left hip? Beats us. We can’t figure it out so its not SC. Next?

 

That’s funny. Nobody knew about Agent Orange in 1973. The doctor suggested I smoked too much. I sure didn’t. That would be the “civilian doctor” Air America employed.

Posted in AO, VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

TODAY’S FACEBOOK WINNER

I’m apolitical in that I feel they’re all crooks on both sides of the aisle. I have to go through my Facebook and weed out all the diatribes pro and con every day now. This one I couldn’t resist sharing:

Please. No comments. It is what it is. A takeoff of a very endearing movie. I merely find it humorous-nothing more. The scarecrow could have said “I’m a Republican” and I would still have published it.The election is getting nastier every day. Tomorrow they’ll probably paint Toto as a Libertarian.

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

VA “Maps” and “How to get away with crime?”

What is the The easiest way to ripoff the VA and not be prosecuted?  Do it from the “inside”, not the outside,  as either a VA employee, or contractor.     I thought the VAOIG’s job was to “protect” Veterans, not “prosecute” them.  Yep.  If you want to rip the VA off, then do it right and become an employee or contractor.

No, this is not an article on “how to” commit a crime and get away with it.

Instead, its a “Why” VA employees get away with murder, while Vets are prosecuted for much lesser crimes?   This trend makes one wonder where this comes from.  Is it from the bottom?   In addition to “blaming Veterans” for the VA woes, the VA loves to blame junior employees.

Ok. You Don’t beleive our VA would do “this” to our Veterans they are supposed to be serving?  Neither did I.

Here are a few VA employees who got off scott free, or, at least their “spankings” were not widely published:

Here VA employees in Detroit, in order to deceive management “hid” Veterans claims instead of processing them.

This article shows a “map” of Veterans “ripped off” by VA employees who “contracted” with their “favorite” thugs to steal money from Vets.  The VA does an extensive and complex  check on Veterans to ensure Vets are entitled to benefits, but their fiduciaries?  No criminal checks are necessary or desired.   Smells like a “payoff” to me.

Oh, but if you are a Veteran...expect the VA to throw you in jail and throw away the key, for what its VA employees do regularly.

While I am not condoning the stealing of our government’s (or Veterans) money, these Vets stole, perhaps, $36,000.  Peanuts.  Insider theft is hundreds and hundreds of millions or, more likely, billions.  Remember this is just ONE vA conference.  It does not appear the others were investigated.  Can someone explain why Vets allegedly stealing a mere 36 grand are prosecuted, while VA  employee crooks abscond with millions and go free?

This VA executive was caught shredding Vets evidence and got “promoted” to VA Central Office, instead of being prosecuted.

All of this makes me wonder just “WHO” does the VA really represent?  Its employees or its Veterans?

Posted in Complaints Department, Guest authors, SHREDDERGATE, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SUICIDES UP IN MILITARY

In the news–38 troops checked out in July before their enlistments were up causing great consternation among the war planners at the Puzzle Palace. A spokesman for Fort Fumble was heard to mumble something off microphone to the effect that these troops had no idea what they were doing to morale or they never would have committed suicide. What wasn’t apparent before is that this represents just the Army numbers. The Marines, Air Force and Coasties are holding their cards higher and not revealing their losses.

Military planners are assessing the effect of what will happen if this continues. Apparently it may affect unit cohesion, troop levels, and whether anyone will want to sign up for military service in coming years. Morale is reputed to be in the tank over this among many who see our mission in Afstan as untenable. News and film at eleven.

Posted in Gulf War Issues, PTSD, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AFGE FED UP WITH THEIR OWN SYSTEM?

VA raters are a committed bunch of guys. They do not set out to 86 our claims. They have a set of rules and they are constrained to do their job within the narrow perimeters erected around them. This is the M 21 Adjudications manual. I find it interesting that they are finally willing to put their foot down and find common ground with us. I also notice I’m getting repeated hits from their Union-sponsored site of Joe Average Vet’s rather humorous post regarding the fix they are constructing to overcome their problems.

Right on, Brothers. Included in this was a link to a committed, longtime Vets’ advocate, Leo  Dougherty. Check it out. Very informative not just for St. Pete but for the nation. We at asknod commend you for the work you do. We also wish you had a better set of circumstances to deal with. The Winston-Salem Cigarette RO would be the next logical choice of an AFGE-sponsored grievance event. Those poor boys are going to have bad backs after packing files up and down the stairs to the basement and the fifth floor. How do they even find anything up there on the sixth floor? It looks like Cupcake’s walk-in closet with files instead of shoes..

 

Posted in Complaints Department, vA news | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

FOOTLOCKER–M16 LEFTOVERS

When we went sightseeing up at the Plain Of Jars, we always took a bag of goodies. My favorite was an M-79 and the pilot liked his CAR-15 which was simply a shorty version of the M16. I had a bag I got from somewhere that held four 20-rd. clips for 16s. I ran into it several days ago and finally got the camera charged up to immortalize it. I picked it up at the AirAm  AOC (Air Operations Center) at Luang Prabang (Lima-54) in July 1970. It was manufactured in September 1959 according to the stamp on it.

I shot all the rounds in them years ago but kept the clips.

Check this out. Some enterprising individual was tasked with the responsibility of tagging clips containing  API (Armor-piercing incendiaries) with red paint. The green ones were armor-piercing (AP). I had a green clip too but I think my son in law has it now. I accidentally shot all the AP stuff on the Fourth of  July a number of years ago. Oh well.

Posted in From the footlocker | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

HCV–THE CONUNDRUM OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES

Every once in a while a new wrinkle shows up in the carpet. Member Donte writes of his latest predicament and vA’s response at the vARO level.  This took me aback for several minutes. I know how I would fight it but Donte has already approached it from that angle so it will require a more nuanced approach-perhaps one involving a precedental setting before the Court.

The facts:

Donte was drafted in July 1967 as an 11B groundpounder.  His unit got clobbered during the 68 Tet Christmas/New Years celebration up near Cu Chi and he had to cart a few of his buddies out to the dustoff. Some were permanently horizontal and a lot were bleeding profusely. B-40s tend to rearrange body parts in strange ways. He has a CIB and a Bronze Star in addition to the “I was there” ribbons. He had a minor possession bust for left-handed tobacco but no hard time at the Long Binh Hotel for Troubled Youth. It amounted to signing an admission of guilt and forfeiture of one month’s pay. This will hound him for the rest of his life in vA’s eyes but we’ll get to that later.

Donte came home and got into no further trouble. He was honorably discharged in May 1969 and moved on with his life. He had a few DUIs and an illegal discharge of a firearm conviction (shooting a vicious raccoon on his back porch). He married in 1980 and has been been happily so ever since. He has three grown children, no history of wild, sexual behaviour or drug busts. He’s not as religious as some but more so than others. In short, he’s Joe Average Vet with one exception. He has HCV and apparently has had it for quite some time.

Like most of us, he felt that gradual decline in his health that was inexplicable for his age. He was pestered by his significant other to get a physical and find out. In 2003, the doctors told him about the bug. He tried the dragon breath but it came back after six months of SVR. He opted to forego a second treatment as it really boogered up his health. He now has DM2, blurry vision and fibromyalgia. Granted, the DM2 can be ascribed to AO and he’s getting 20% for that now but these ailments didn’t materialize until after treatment. vA maintains it’s just one hell of a coincidence and has nothing to do with Interferon.

Donte read up at HCVets and began to suspect he either got the bug from the jetguns or blood exposure in Nam. Either way, he was Stage three-Grade three and headed towards an ugly future. He filed for it in 2006 and got the usual “It ain’t in the records, homey so you must have got it from the left-handed tobacco in Nam. You do remember the UCMJ violation for drugs, don’t you? The use of drugs is willful misconduct and the use of marijuana is evidence of a lifestyle that involves other drug risks that would put you at risk of contracting HCV.” We won’t go into how smoking Mother nature causes this. Obviously vA is far more knowledgeable on the subject.

As he continued to fight this, he and his wife discovered she was infected with HCV as well. He promptly submitted this as evidence and the fact that they were both in a caring and loving relationship with no extramarital affairs. The children, thank God, were spared the disease. No one is sure how but vA Examiners slaughtered several chickens out back of the RO, studied the entrails, and jumped to the conclusion that it was transmitted sexually. While this vector may have it’s adherents, the vA is notable for declining to find it a risk in service without the magic nexus paper. Of course, after service it becomes the smoking gun to the exclusion of all other risks. This is where Donte found himself in 2007. He dug far and wide for articles and pictures of jetguns. He sent in a buddy letter from one of his service friends who attested to the Tet Perimeter Party. He submitted all the medical records he could assemble including the biopsy showing the advanced age of the infection as evidenced by the state of the liver fibrosis. What he didn’t send in, and what his VSO neglected to mention, was a NEXUS LETTER. At the urging of his service representative, he signed up for a DRO review in late 2007. Cue up the Jeopardy music, Alex.

The  2010 DRO review maintained that he had very probably contracted it from his wife! Even if you set aside the fact that her HCV was at Stage Two and Grade Two, it was becoming more and more incongruous. At some point shortly after sending in his Form 9 following the receipt of the SOC, he and Punkin discovered his genotype ( 1A) was different from hers (1B). He immediately sent this in as additional evidence that categorically proved the vA wrong in their “nexus” of the probable etiology for the HCV. This is like pissing into the wind at this stage. The snowball had started rolling downhill and the inertia was established. Nothing short of Celestial Intervention was going to stay the hand of the vA. They had made a finding and unless CUE could be proven, it was all for naught! Since Donte now lacked a) a paying job with medical benefits and b) a degree in medicine he was screwed. His vA doctor was unable to provide him with a nexus as they have been briefed not to. Donte lacked the assets to seek out the Dr. Bash “gold -plated” $6,000.00 version. Since Dr. Bash doesn’t take IOUs, he had no game plan.

The SSOC was short and concise. It explained nothing nor did it address the inability of 1A to metamorphose into 1B or vice-versa. It simply said “We have considered the additional evidence you submitted and feel it is new and material but does not convince us that our decision was materially in error. While we found your lay testimony to be credible, a detailed medical theory regarding genotypes is considered beyond the ability of someone lacking a background in medicine. You are free to submit additional evidence and we will consider it if you do.”

Donte is finally headed to the BvA after six long years. He will get the ugly remand for an Independent Medical Opinion from one of vA’s finest Obstetrician/Gynecologists who I understand also moonlight as Gastroenterologists . Said “Gastrodoc for a day” will opine on what the meaning of “is” is and eventually prove the chicken preceded the egg.  Genotypes will be discussed and many martinis will be consumed looking for a viable answer to the metamorphosis question. Trust me. Absent a well-reasoned doctor’s nexus from Donte they will come up with what they feel is a viable way to sustain their denial. If you doubt it, read this one.

Plan B- contact Asknod for advice.

“Whoo-doggies” as Jed Clampett was fond of opining. What can I say? Where do I start? Donte, you need professional help. This can easily be won but not at the Agency level (the VARO) now. Fortunately you are out of that insane asylum. Unfortunately for you, you did not have all the facts necessary to win nor a nexus that would have precluded having to visit Washington DC. on appeal. Getting a nexus at this stage is dicey. vA is going to go balls to the wall to put this one in the closed file. I’m sure they think they have it in the bag. Finding an attorney would be an excellent idea as I do not think you are equipped to combat this. I do not say that to demean you but the need for professional help at this juncture is not going to be provided by a VSO. They are good for holding you coat in a fight. They make excellent mailmen for delivering your pleas. If they neglected to mention the Hickson elements (aka Caluza/Shedden), you have to consider the possibility that they simply aren’t up to the task of defending you against 500 or so of vA’s finest law dogs. Leaglezoom.com has it’s drawbacks and you have just discovered them.

There are as many philosophies on the pros and cons of VSOs as there are stars in the night sky. For every pro I have heard three cons. Congress set up an interesting system that appears to be viable for Vets and indeed, heavily tilted in their favor. In practice, Vets find something different. I did and so have the majority of the Vets I have helped. Some VSOs are ably trained to help and I commend them. Were they all trained properly, the vA would be granting 50 to 60 percent of the claims submitted. Since they aren’t, 85% receive denials and many give up.

Dr. Cecil (see top under VSM) helps Vets by providing a free nexus letter for HCVets. He doesn’t do windows nor will he opine on neuritis or neuralgia. I would suggest a primer education by cruising through the site and looking at different aspects of denial. Yours is truly unique as I mentioned, but can be overcome. To win, you need to start assembling all the facts into one pile that support your position. As I have not seen the mountain of filings to and fro from you and vA, I cannot give sage advice. I hesitate to do so anyway. From what you describe, the argument should stand on its own two feet. vA sees it otherwise and has now firmly planted both heels in the dirt. Getting them to change their minds is futile.

You mentioned an attorney you have contacted. I strongly suggest that avenue. This claim has progressed too far in the wrong direction for an easy resolution. You are going to spend a few years in Hell getting this turned around. I would almost suggest reading my book but I do not feel it will avail you at this stage. It will, however, explain why you and innumerable others lose. It may help insofar as you can use it to win after you get a remand from the Court. They aren’t doctors but anyone with half their brain tied behind their back can see the medical error. Sadly, the vA cannot or will not.

Posted in ASKNOD BOOK, vARO Decisions, Vietnam Disease Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment