THE FASTEST GUN IN THE WEST–THE JETGUN

sylvia PriceAs many know, our famous nurse Sylvia Price has scored the ultimate eBay item. Yeppers. HCVets has it’s own jetgun now and all those skanky manuals that went with it. The revelations that are going to come out now will seriously compromise years of VA intransigence and insistence that these inoculation devices were clean and pure as the driven snow. 

Here’s a sampling of the new and material evidence that will be available soon to all Vets and their attorneys to rebut the insidious lies and the attempted rebuttal in the 2004 FAST Letter that opened the can of worms we still have today. As soon as Sylvia can fetch me a manual for reproduction, we’ll try to get it up in a word-searchable .pdf here if possible.

This is going to bust decades of VA HCV jurisprudence and reveal it for what it was-junk science to avoid paying Veterans their due for unsanitary inoculation practices.

IMG_2930

eBay find

IMG_2957 (1)

Das Gun

 

IMG_2932

“How-to” on sanitary protocols

IMG_2960

Documents we were never supposed to see.

 

 

 

IMG_2938

Foot-operated model. Pedal is inside the carrying case. If you stepped in dog poo and used the foot pedal, you in essence contaminated the carrying case including the jetgun. Brilliant. Now think of stepping in blood on the floor from some nervous recruit who flinched, and you have the perfect path to introduce HCV inside the case (and on the gun).

IMG_2961 (1)

Unsterility at it’s worst.

 

 

IMG_2949

replacement nozzles in case of sterility failure (blood)

IMG_2962

Repair parts for jetgun

IMG_2944

Extra nostril for gun in repair parts box.

IMG_2939

Sanitary parts repair tool.

IMG_2958 (1)

Slow death at 1400 psi

 

Posted in From the footlocker, HCV Health, HCV Risks (documented), Jetgun Claims evidence, Medical News, research, Tips and Tricks, VA Medical Mysteries Explained | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

ILP–THE GREAT BIG TRAVEL BOARD HEARING

searo346Veterans Press-dateline April 29, 2015–Seattle VARO 346. Wowser. As I mentioned several weeks ago, VA opted to take me seriously and get me in to see a Travel Board Judge (VLJ) from the BVA at my earliest convenience. Since we know the VA does nothing for the personal convenience of Veterans, it appears this was a way to appease the big boys at the OGC that chewed their (Seattle’s) ass over their untimely delay of my 21 year claim. 

LawBob Squarepants flew in as expected and we set up the TUOC across the street in the Hotel Alexis coffee shop that morning to go over the order of battle. The assigned VLJ, Vito Clemente, I believe, is a Veteran-possibly of the immediate post-Vietnam era. Nevertheless, he’s the first one I have met that didn’t give me the piercing goldbrick stare. Face it. Veterans seeking compensation will always be viewed as charter members of the Safeway Slip on the Floor Club by VA personnel. We are considered trailer trash to put it mildly. Thus it was refreshing to be greeted by a Judge (Call me Vito) with no preconceived notions of my motives.

Judge Clemente first asked if he had the authority to grant me a greenhouse and asked where the authority emanated from. Obviously, this was all new to him. Once apprised of the legality of 38 USC §3120 and the ILP family of regulations, he replied with the greatest effervescence and said “Awesome. I’ve never awarded Vets anything but ratings. This will be interesting to say the least”. Boy howdy did we give him an education on ILP-or the extreme lack of it these days.

LawBob touched on the skin disease and cryoglobulinemia to make sure he understood the concept of photosensitivety and vasculitis (extreme pain associated with exposure of extremities to temperatures below 40 degrees). This was important on two fronts. It was important to prove a) I have both diseases and b)how they drive my need for protection from the elements outdoors (the greenhouse).

VA Visitor BadgeNext, we tackled the thorny issue of why VA seems unable to just cut the Gordian knot and grant a 100% rating for the porphyria. Never, in all the time of studying diseases and ratings, have I seen VA so recalcitrant about handing out what most would consider the proper analogous rating based on the predominant features of the disease. Following the C&P diagnosing total disability, they issued a paltry 10%. This didn’t shock me as I know VA tries to low ball. After a NOD requesting a DRO review, they clawed back the 10% (pyramiding) and gave me 40% for the phlebotomies. After the four-year CUE battle, they returned the 10% for skin and upped the porphyria to 60% following submission of the Writ.

Judge Clemente looked me in the eye and asked me what I thought was the most applicable code to apply for the Porphyria and why. I immediately made the analogy to blood cleansing ( §4.115a dialysis) and plebotomies. I was able to insert the American Red Cross’ admonition that donating blood may only be done every 57 days versus my monthly phlebotomies of the identical amount (800 ml=one pint). I also confessed that a 100% rating under the old DC 7700 anemia rating was also equally for application at 100% in spite of VA’s vain attempt to characterize phlebotomies as “acute events”. Veterans really have no idea how far VA will go in their attempts to characterize your illnesses/injuries as far more minor and insignificant than they really are. Hell, all you have to do is look at their initial 10% award for totally disabled to verify that.

Judge Vito summarized his hearing with a brief synopsis of what we’d covered, and then uttered the magic phrase to Bob. “I’m gonna approve your AOD request. It’s only fair here.” AOD, to all of you Vets and budding NOVA kids is Advancement on the Docket- as in 38 CFR §20.900 (c). This is the penultimate cherry on top and guarantees the decision will be promulgated within the next two months or so.

In sum, I refuse to count my chickens in their embryo form. It was my unpleasant experience to have VLJ Mark Hindin smile and tell me how speshull I was. Less than a month later, he refused my request for advancement (AOD) and then went on to deny using the same VARO logic to the point of plagiarizing the denial language. This proves my point about BVA staff attorneys top -sheeting claims and not bothering to investigate the contentions put forth by the appellant.

2015-04-29 09.54.18

Box #1-c-file (six files from 1989-2007)

I do wish to apologize for a misconception I have been aiding and abetting over the last year. Contrary to mys assertions, my VA c-file, which is still in it’s original brown file folders, is  not eleven folders thick. I lied. We ascertained it was only ten folders yesterday morning but the tenth file is almost full. It will be eleven by the time we have the hearing deposition typed up and the new decision from Judge Clemente. We also stuffed a bunch of new evidence into it in support of my greenhouse.

2015-04-29 09.54.02

Box #2 of c-file sans the VR&E files… check out the industrial strength cart

What was strangely absent was what I had specifically asked for and signed a request for on April 17th. I/we need a copy of my VR&E file and we were assured one would be copied and provided either before the hearing (mailed) or provided an hour or so beforehand to facilitate review and our argument/presentation at the hearing. Toward that end, we arrived early. VA’s travel Board coordinator, Ms. Tammy Skrinski, arrived empty-handed claiming she had disremembered to copy it and promised it in short order as the c-file cart containing my 80 pound file was in the hearing room. She pranced in and rescued it only to find there were no VR&E records within.  Ruh-oh Rorge. This prompted a VARO-wide search for them that turned up nothing. Someone ran across the street to the scanning vendor in charge of copying these things,  but alas-t’was not there. As most  know, it’s against the law in 56 states (and the AMC) to separate the contents of c-files.

2015-04-29 11.54.16My guess when we got to the elevator to go down after the hearing was that the VR&E files were very, very near and busy being revamped/shredded or in the process of being lost. A c-file travels like an army- together as one. Considering the VR&E offices are on the same 13th Floor where the hearing was held, the “misplaced” files would still legally be in the general vicinity of the rest of my c-file. Ms. Skrinski assures me that I’ll have them “soon” because her coach said I would. We have 60 days to submit additional evidence from the hearing. Remember, VR&E’s head honcho refused to issue a SSOC  (or SSSOC) rebutting the latest new and material evidence last May. That, too, is against the law across the VA’s fruited RO plain. Fortunately, Judge Clemente agreed to accept the new/old package of new and material evidence and forego a remand for a de novo denial in the first instance. I got the impression he wasn’t too enchanted with Seattle’s finest if they couldn’t even find a VR&E folder in a pile ten-high. By now, I expect I have my very own file cabinet so it’s not likely they stuck it in Alan Grant’s file. I  strongly expect he’s after me alphabetically because I have some of his in mine.

Stay tuned for the remains of the CAVC Writ and it’s gradual fallout.  For the moment, I remain at 180% disabled. Should Judge Clemente grant the extra 100% schedular and 30% for my skin, I’ll be officially 100%+100%+40% +30%+10%- or 270%. All I wanted was 20% remuneration for porphyria and 10% for my ears in 1994. I had no idea I had HCV back then. I suppose this is a classic example of get ‘er done early instead of waiting for the house to fall down in an earthquake.

SSOC rebuttal for greenhouse

download

100% for PCT and a greenhouse-pronto.

Posted in BvA Decisions, BvA HCV decisions, Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus, Independent Living Program, Porphyria Cutanea Tarda, Tips and Tricks, VA Medical Mysteries Explained, VA security Breaches, vARO Decisions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

LZ CORK–BUTCH GETS HIS TEETH

2015-02-14 14.19.39On behalf of myself and all you folks out there who made it possible with your generosity, I got Butch his new teeth (upper plate) that the Hospital threw away last November. Seems they didn’t think he needed them any more in ICU because he was starting to do the chicken. Considering what he survived at LZ Cork in 1969, I think the chowderheads at the hospital underestimated what it takes to snuff an 11 Bravo with a CIB.

I would also like to thank Jerri and Joey Berlanga of Parkland Dentures for bending over backwards to get Butch in so soon and manufacture them in a hurry. Four visits later and Butch is now armed and dangerous. I hear a Frag Order for Applebee’s is now in motion and will report the BDA back when I hear it. Butch intimated his parachute is packed and he’s back on flight status.

images

 

Thanks again to the generosity of all you who contributed to make this happen. This is why Veterans are my favorite people. They are not selfish and often concern themselves about other Veterans to their own detriment. We are a very small club-we six percenters- and you cannot come back late in life and decide to join.

Posted in Inspirational Veterans, KP Veterans, Vietnam War history | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

BVA–COMBAT ENHANCEMENT UNDER 1154(b)?

635646931319099161-veterans-administration-logoSomebody contact the DAV in New York, New York pronto. This combat Vet got screwed and he has about a month or more to saddle up for the NOA at the CAVC . In this day and age, one would think VSOs have accumulated some knowledge on what is located in 38 CFR and 38 USC. Sadly, that isn’t the case here.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files1/1505964.txt

 

 

Everyone in the legal arena is acquainted with the legal concept that anything that falls from your lips regarding your combat experiences is golden truth-untarnished by your financial desire for backsheesh. Our 11 Bravo Vet cum Medic in a pinch is denied all of this- notwithstanding a GSW in the thigh. What does it take to get traction at the VA? Granted, he may have sampled Peru’s finest, but the investigation cannot stop there. It doesn’t eviscerate his combat enhancement under 38 USC § 1154(b). It merely adds another risk factor to the equation.

Having been in combat, I’m fairly familiar with the concept of blood everywhere-some mine and often some of others. To deny this Son of War his due on only one facet and ignore the truly salient risk requires ignoring his valor and that Purple Nurple hanging somewhere in his house.

Regarding the Veteran’s assertions that he was exposed to others’ blood while working as a medic, the examiner noted that there is no evidence that the Veteran reported open wounds while treating other veterans, nor is there evidence that the Veteran presented with any symptoms of Hepatitis C (specifically jaundice) prior to his discharge in 1969. The examiner also noted that the Veteran reported abusing cocaine and that hepatitis C can be transmitted through the nose of cocaine users. The Board finds the November 2011 examination to be highly probative as it reflects consideration of all relevant facts.

I guess a GSW in the leg isn’t categorically an “open wound” as VA views it. We have Acting Veterans Law Judge S. Heneks for his probative analysis  and consideration of all the facts in the case. Welcome to VA justice folks.

 

Posted in 1154(b) combat presumptions, BvA HCV decisions, HCV Risks (documented), Veterans Law, Vietnam War history | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

BVA–OPEN MOUTH/INSERT LSD

VeteransAdministration.12755109_stdIn what might be one of the largest wastes of judicial time in the history of the VA, we are saddled with PRC 100 repairman Johnboy Vet. Johnny has yet to meet any drug he doesn’t like. The cumulative effects seem to have clouded his judgment. He has somehow wandered all the way up to the hallowed halls of  BVA justice only to encounter the frightful reality that at some point in the past, his commanding officer decided he wasn’t “be all you can be” material.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files1/1505994.txt

Worse yet, they wrote it all down and preserved it for posterity on the off chance he might show up and claim it was all a big misunderstanding. I see and read a lot of these where the Vet claims PTSD due to experiences in Vietnam. Some are humorous such as the one where the wife testified to any number of stressors her hubster suffered (hearsay). The problem was he never left the United States. BVA records don’t tell us if a divorce was forthcoming after the combat deception was unmasked.

Acting VLJ L.M. Barnard summed it up thusly:

It is inconceivable that given this extensive use of drugs, which rendered him habitually disoriented, while in Vietnam he could possibly have participated in any meaningful combat role.

No Bozos

No Bozos

I feel compassion for these Vets but I have no sympathy for their utilizing the judicial system as a welfare lever to extract money. Lord knows, many of you wait an interminably long time for justice and a small part is due to these chuckleheads. The VFW should have better controls in place to “vet the Vet” and prevent this kind of abuse.

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, HCV Risks (documented) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BVA–PERSONAL LAY TESTIMONY IS A VALID TECHNIQUE

VeteransAdministration.12755109_stdI love BVA decisions for their simplicity. Here’s a great jetgun win that stands up on its own two legs because there’s really nothing to poke a hole in. It helps when the VA examiner quotes the FAST Letter in 2004 and lets slip the “plausible” word. That has probably helped more Vets than we can count and now it is becoming more prevalent. Use this decision as a template to a win. 

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files1/1506800.txt

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, HCV Risks (documented), Jetgun BvA Decisions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

BVA–PADDING THE MEDICAL RECORD

download (3)I do not know how many times I have seen this phenomenon occur in VA law. Johnny Vet goes to VAMC for ailment. Johnny Vet is tested for HCV and turns up positive. Mr. Vet’s doctor, in true VA style, inquires as to his personal recreational drug habits. Johnny Vet assiduously avers any such activity and cites ETOH abuse with maybe a side of Cannabis in the remote past. Follow on doctors decide to “improve on his statements” and ascribe all manner of drug abuse to him with no basis in fact. 

Several years/decades later, when applying for comp. benefits, Johnny gets tarred and feathered by things he never said- and  in this case, previously denied. This is a classic case but Johnboy upstaged them to his credit. He denied this activity in 1990 but it came back to haunt him in an unsubstantiated and undocumented remark eleven years later.

When called on it, VA physicians often shrug their shoulders and say “Well, maybe I got Johnny and Jimbo confused with each other. So sue me.” That’s how this happens. Too many patients and too little time for record keeping at the moment of interaction (exam).

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files1/1506919.txt

Post service medical evidence reflects that at the time of a hospitalization in September 1990 for treatment of an unrelated condition, the Veteran denied intravenous drug abuse (IVDA). However, a November 2001 evaluation by a professor of medicine reflects that the Veteran “does have a history of multiple recreational drug use including intravenous but has not done this since 1975.” In correspondence received by the VA in August 2011, the Veteran explicitly denied any intravenous drug use.

Once the stain is on the sheets, nothing can stop the pell mell rush to denial as witnessed here.  I’ve discovered a lot of these things can begin in group therapy sessions with PTSD patients. Jimbo stands up and says “Hi. I was a door gunner in a Huey in I Corps in 67. I used to do a lot of smack. I’ve cleaned up”. Johnny stands up and says he liked to get Extremely Trashed Or Hammered too because it numbed him back then. Johnny now gets a check mark next to his name because the “professor of medicine” supervising the group disunderstood he was trying to say ETOH  as in regular old alcohol. Johnny is now a junkie and there’s no callin’ back them doggies.

The June 2011 opinion is inadequate because the examiner erroneously relied on a statistical generality about cause of Hepatitis C without specifically explaining why, in the Veteran’s case, other potential causes were not the likeliest cause of his Hepatitis C. Additionally, the examiner accepted intravenous drug use as a reality without crucially analyzing, considering, or addressing the other medical records that contradicted the assertion.

This is prima facie evidence of why you need your VA medical records as well as your c-file to investigate what will eventually be used against you. That the Vet prevailed and won is due in no small part to his “prepositioned”statement in 1990. Had this been absent, I wouldn’t be writing this. It also helps when idiot VA examiners get diarrhea of the mouth and run on about things they know nothing about.

Mostly, this decision illustrates what I have encountered over and over again in eight years of helping Vets. Robert, of Los Angeles, was similarly smeared by this technique but the chowderheads entered the damning notation in pen into VISTA records (which were printed) much like what happened to Phil Cushman. Quite simply, don’t like the diagnosis or the facts? What the hell. Write your own in. Who cares if they’re aftermarket and undated with no corroboration? We’re VA. We don’t need no stinkin’ corroboration. Incidentally, Robert won with no big deal at the BVA. That it had to go up to Vermin Ave. NW for that Cushman determination is the non sequitur.

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, HCV Risks (documented), VA Conspiracies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Good news: Statins and liver cancer study

artery

Most graphics I’ve looked at show the liver and digestive organs in isolation. This one helps me grasp the liver – heart connections.  This slide, # 24, was published on Slideshare by Eman Abdallah. Brooks/Cole–Thompson Learning.

Quick note.  A private doctor has recently prescribed statins to improve my husband’s lipid numbers. Previously, safety concerns about hepatitis and statins have kept them out of his medicine kit.  I’m assuming these fears are now allayed for other people with a history of HCV.   Our amazing livers, which make cholesterol (LINK), are workaholics.  

The VA writes (LINK):

All the blood that flows from the intestines, stomach, and spleen is filtered through the liver. The blood flows into the liver through the portal vein. It filters through the liver in a system of smaller and smaller veins. As blood passes over liver cells, these cells process nutrients in the blood. This processing makes products like proteins and sugars that can be used by the body. Blood is carried out of the liver through the hepatic vein to the heart.

A large literature metastudy, Statin use and risk of liver cancer: an update meta-analysis (LINK) by was published in 2014. Chinese researchers searched the following databases with relevant keywords:

The systematic computerised search for eligible studies were performed on the database of PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, Web of Science, EMBASE, EBSCO and Cochrane Library, covering all studies published from their inception to 5 March 2014.

The full text of the study is free to read online if you want to dig into it.  Their overall conclusion, “suggests that statin is associated with a significant risk reduction of liver cancer when taken daily for cardiovascular event prevention.”  The researchers also make this surprising statement:  “Statins might be considered as an adjuvant in the treatment of liver cancer.”

Even people with a “higher baseline risk of liver cancer, defined as patients with older age, HBV or HCV infection, there was a trend towards more decrease of liver cancer risk …than in the other eight studies with general population.”  But liver cancer risk reduction was less when there were other “confounding” conditions such as alcoholic liver disease.

The FDA has a webpage devoted to statin risks (LINK) such as muscle pain.  However, the agency is upbeat:

This new information should not scare people off statins, says Amy G. Egan, M.D., M.P.H., deputy director for safety in FDA’s Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products (DMEP). “The value of statins in preventing heart disease has been clearly established,” she says. “Their benefit is indisputable, but they need to be taken with care and knowledge of their side effects.”

grapefruit

FDA: “Examples of some types of drugs that grapefruit juice can interact with are: some statin drugs to lower cholesterol, such as Zocor (simvastatin), Lipitor (atorvastatin) and Pravachol (pravastatin)”

 

The VA has posted information online about their research on statins, statins and exercise, drug interactions and much more.  A brief VA fact sheet on cholesterol medications (LINK) outlines some other options.  The FDA also reminds people to check to see if they have to give up grapefruit with these or other meds (LINK).

So the news seems promising for people, with or without a history of hepatitis, who want to try statins after weighing the risks and benefits.  The potential to reduce cholesterol and the risk of liver cancer at the same time is a huge plus.  I am curious to know if the VA is prescribing statins for patients with a history of hepatitis and if others have experienced negative side effects from statins that made them discontinue their use.

 

Posted in Guest authors, HCV Health, HCV Risks (documented) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

BVA–TRAVEL BOARD HEARINGS

va_sealI see much written both here and over at HADIT.com about BVA hearings. For the majority of you, in the interests of getting rated as soon as possible, waiting for a Travel Board hearing face-to-face with a Veterans Law Judge is a two-year plus extravaganza you can ill afford. Most opt for the Videoconference method by their local VARO connected to the Judge sitting in DC. Few are willing to wait out a shot at the eyeball-to-eyeball  poker game and fewer still are willing to fly back to DC for a one-on-one in the Judge’s conference room.

Every hearing I’ve had-all two- have been the face-to- face version. I count the first DRO hearing in  October 1990 as one. This was before the term DRO existed. He was the rating officer, the senior rating officer and the DRO all rolled into one.  Mr. J.F. Wallace went on to become what we now call the Veterans Service Center Manager or VSCM and actually was there when I reopened in 2007.

I missed the second one. In 1991, they didn’t tell us these things. It disappeared off to DC and then surfaced like a bobber after a strike in a year or so- denied. IN fact, old Ron Ampe, my DAV rep. never bothered to mention the CAVC  option. I was so naive back then. Ouch.

A Board hearing with the judge is a disconcerting occasion for many. If you have any practice in public speaking, it’s far easier. Looking the judge in the eye when you’re talking is paramount. I’ve discussed this in my book but the crux of the matter is now that you have his undivided attention in this setting, you have to impress him/her with your intensity, your commitment to justice and your willingness to wait a long time to face him/her to communicate what no one else seems to have been able to convey- what happened, how it happened and why you’re there.

Having a VSO representative, to me, was about as effective as an umbrella in the far wall of a hurricane. He contributed nothing. In my second hearing before Judge Mark Hindin, I had a bobblehead doll who nodded and took no notes. I showed him every point, every legal turn and gave him the proper cites. It was all for naught. He skipped right over the 1994 NOD with N&ME like a stylus on a scratched record and kept on going. It was the only way to make the denial stick. Most oddly, he gave me not 45 minutes to discuss Air America but fully one hour and twenty minutes. I cannot say there was planned denial but one must admit that VA didn’t cotton to the idea of another Leroy Macklem on their doorstep asking for 200% back to 1994. It’s far easier to deny a pro se Vet on the off chance he’ll fold and never even call up NSVLP or file a NOA.

When I filed the Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus or EWOM for short, I knew it would ignite a firestorm. I submitted my letters to Call me Bob. I submitted all the IRIS messages from VA that clotheslined them with their own statements. I screenshotted eBenefits every time something changed though it rarely did over 4 years. In short, the Writ evidence exceeded 95 pages alone. It was particularly damning and gave them little cover to hide behind. As documented in  The Birth of A Writ, the VA magnanimously slipped into high gear and granted almost all I asked for. Almost.

No Bozos

No Bozos

Left unfinished was the 60% for Porphyria that I asked 100% for. Also missing was the ILP Greenhouse. VA insisted I never filed a rebuttal to the SSOC issued May 5th, 2014 and therefore there was no need for an additional one in the answer to my Writ. Silly VA. Green cards are for Vets.  ILP SSOC rebuttal rcv’d by SEARO 346 5-22-2014 .That’s the oldest trick in the book.  And, as we all know, if you send in a rebuttal to an SSOC with New and material evidence, the de novo crew has to get to work, fabricate another Adobe 2 denial document with the wrong tense and dangling participles- and- in a separate document, reissue a new SSOC continuing the ongoing denial. Under no circumstances can you blow off a submission of new and material evidence-ever. That’s a major Bozo No-No. Here, we have the hierarchy, the crème de la crème of the Appeals team dropping the ball- or not.

unnamed (3)Remember? We’re talking VR&E Officers trying desperately to be DROs. That’s like trying to pretend to be a pilot. Eventually it’s going to become evident you don’t have a clue what you’re doing in the left seat when you can’t even turn on the engine. Throughout the denial game over the last four years, these chowderheads have misquoted 38 CFR, denied with no reasons and bases, miscounted greenhouses and lastly issued a SSOC using  brand new 2014 regulations in the M 28 R manual. Failing to rebut my answer and issuing a Form 8 certifying this is virtually impossible to comprehend. A first year law student isn’t that stupid by the third day.

While I was in San Francisco at the NOVA conference, I got a frantic call- actually three in a row- from our old friends at the VA Prize Redemption Center on Friday the 17th.  The 800-827-1000 was a dead giveaway. I smiled as I answered. Sure enough, the VA travel board coordinator was eager to pencil me in Wednesday the 29th of April for 1030 hrs with VLJ Vito Clemente. I gladly accepted and waived the 30-day requirement for scheduling board hearings. I managed to also inveigle “Peggy” into relinquishing my VR&E file so Bob Walsh can defend me properly. Considering he’s my mouthpiece, seems the call should have gone to him anyway. Mostly, we want it to make sure they have my SSOC rebuttal in the file so we can hang them.

Two scenarios unfold. We could logically ask for a remand back to have the Seattle bozos redeny the greenhouse and issue the missing SSOC-or- we can overlook their stupidity and submit my rebuttal as a new document-yep- as in new and material evidence, submitted directly to the judge with a waiver of review in the first instance in Seattle. The latter seems to be the preferred choice but we get to reveal the SSOC presumption of stupidity attaches to the Seattle VR &E office.

I wish to thank Bruce McCartney for the prodigious amount of statistics he has unearthed showing the ILP is a chimera. His greenhouse appears to be the only one issued to date. Much of my evidence is his evidence. If it were not for him, I would probably still be oblivious to the ILP.

imagesThe hearing this Wednesday will be attended by my trusty rainmaker LawBob Squarepants who is flying in Tuesday from Detroit. I’ve been waiting for this do over since 1994. Now I have the moral high ground. VA has little left to use in their defense for arguments. In any case, this isn’t a Perry Mason moment. It’s more an opportunity to sweep up the broken glass and close the book on my  burgeoning eleven-volume c-file. The appeals seem to have been advanced on the docket under 38 CFR 20.900 (c). Which clause they chose to employ to justify it is immaterial.  A decision will in all probability, be forthcoming within two months or so. The evidence is dispositive and the case law/regs for the ILP are iron-clad.

Of course, that’s what I said after I walked out of the hearing with VLJ Hindin April 5th, 2011. It ain’t over until the Vito sings this time.

freezing Hell

Posted in BvA Decisions, BvA HCV decisions, Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus, Independent Living Program, Presumption of Regularity, VR&E | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

THE ROADTRIP POSTSCRIPT

coast road

North of Bodega Bay.

Returning from San Francisco’s NOVA conference was a case study in how you cannot get here from there. Cupcake insisted on taking the Route 1 Coast road. It has more turns than a pissed off sidewinder. The only positive feature is that it doesn’t move or strike like one. A massive traffic jam in Petaluma for road construction caused us to miss the first opportunity after Sausalito. We finally took a cuttoff down a mule track to Bodega Bay. Some may remember Alfred Hitchcock’s movie on that but we sure didn’t see the same town. Typical Hollywood. Go to Victoria BC to get the ambiance and “feel” for something in California. 

The back way to Bodega Bay

After about four hours @ 20 mph, we decided it might take two weeks to get home. Sadly, we decided to make the break from the lovely view and return to the game plan. Unfortunately, we didn’t have one of those Doc Brown DeLoreans with a flux capacitor. In California, they have roads that do not necessarily go where you want to-on the order of a hundred miles backwards to get fifty miles sideways. All this time we thought they just suffered a dearth of water. Check this little 78-mile nightmare backtrack towards San Francisco out.

The long and winding road

The long and winding road to I-5

We arrived in Corning at 2100 hrs., did the choke and puke at a Mexican restaurant and then hit the Holiday Express Inn.

Now, for all of you Veterans, I wish to warn you. In spite of what Holiday Inns say, they do not, I repeat, do not offer a discount to military or Veterans. The young lady in Corning indicated they do offer AAA and AARP discounts but when queried, I was told categorically the Mil/Vet discount does not exist. Holiday Inn advertises to the contrary so do not depend on their ads. Thank you for your service. That will still be $116 samoles.

The high point of the whole road trip, and the primary raison d’etre, in my book, was the last stop. I have not had the opportunity to visit my Uncle Jay for twenty four long years. Sunday, the 19th of April, I was able to do so on a glorious sunny afternoon. I still remembered my way to the old Comstock Cemetery in Curtin, Oregon.

Jay grave

Jay grave 2

 

Cupcake’s trusty 2007 Prius Vetmobile ate an astounding forty eight gallons of gas and came through the experience with flying colors and nary a hiccup. Amenasknodmobile

Too bad we couldn’t just click our ruby red high heels together and keep repeating “There’s no place like home” to speed our journey back to Gig Harbor. One last question for Brad. What in heck are these flowers?  My term for what they resemble is unprintable. They infested the coast road in both deep blue and purple.

Purple  plants all over Route 1

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments