REVISIONIST HISTORY

Here we go again. This from member Jennifer. VA and the military would have us disremember the 80s and 90s when we first started coming forward with AO issues. Backlog? Q’est que c’est que ça? The Vietnam redux lives on. Now, in 2013, we are to believe this is a brand new phenomenon. Here’s a blast from the past of old clips and new.

Of more import is the idea that March 29th, 2013 somehow marks the 40th anniversary of our departure from the land of the red clay. The historians who declare these things must not be on the same page with some of us. Those of you who were assigned to MACV or 1st SOG might disagree with this date. Hell, I know a lot of guys who worked with Montagnards would. Until all the non-disclosure agreements expire and some of the good stuff comes out, we’ll all be forced to swallow the pablum served up. Remember, a picture is worth a thousand words.

6a00d834515edc69e200e5501c94318834-800wi

This was down the street from the US Embassy at Air America several days before May 7th, 1975.

I’m a stickler for accuracy. If there were Marine guards at the Embassy until May 7th, they constitute “troops”. As VA uses May 7th, 1975 for the AO cut off date, I think it is safe to assume their largesse is intentional.

Posted in Vietnam War history | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Army K-9 Security

US Army K-9 security

pant, pant….
U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Shane Hamann, 102nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment.

(3/25/13)

“Sgt. Justin R. Pereira, from Gooding, Idaho, and Laika 5, a Tactical Explosives Detection Dog with 2nd Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, provide security as Afghan Border Police break ground on a new checkpoint March 25, in Spin Boldak district, Kandahar province, Afghanistan. The ABP moved to the new location to block an insurgent infiltration route.”

Posted in Guest authors, Gulf War Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Americans, illicit drug injections, and blood-borne pathogens

How many Americans put themselves at risk for blood-borne pathogens by injecting drugs?

Today’s population: U.S. 315,589,877

CDC (after Epidemiology section)

 “Approximately 1.2 million persons in the United States injected drugs in 2002 (24).”

24.  Brady JE, Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Flom PL, Tempalski B, Gostnell K. Estimating the prevalence of injection drug users in the U.S. and in large U.S. metropolitan areas from 1992 to 2002. J Urban Health 2008;85:323–51.

CDC:  “The prevalence of a history of injection-drug use remained relatively stable at 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4%–1.6%; weighted estimate: 3.4 million persons) during 1979–2002 (25).” 

25.  Armstrong GL. Injection drug users in the United States, 1979–2002: an aging population. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:166–73.

There is no question that as a group,  IDUs have a high concentration of blood-borne pathogens because of their unsterile practices.

We can gain perspective from American data estimates because they shows that HCV cannot be dismissed as mainly an IV drug users disease.  There are just too few IVDUs in the U. S. to account for most of the early cases of blood-borne infections. 

For example, look at a CDC chart of new acute cases of HCV.  We see that the numbers dropped rapidly after 1990s when the DOD withdrew jet gun injectors, the blood-supply and blood products became safer, and other medical interventions became safer. hcv 82-97

hcv 97-2010

 

Posted in Guest authors, HCV Health, HCV Risks (documented), Jetgun Claims evidence | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VHA to providers: we have 165,000 chronically HCV-infected veterans in our care

hcv death by year

GRIM REAPER WILL BE CALLING

From Issue 8, Winter 2012 Public Health Matters Newsletter, Clinical Public Health, VHA Office of Public Health

“Dear Colleagues,

Data from the VA’s National Clinical Case Registry for hepatitis C virus (HCV) confirm the burden of disease in the VA Health Care System and prepare providers for the road ahead as deaths from chronic HCV are expected to rise sharply during the next 10 years.”

At ASKNOD, we know that–

“…Most Veterans with chronic HCV in VA care in recent years were likely infected during the Vietnam War era (1964–1975). Given the natural history of chronic HCV, one would expect to see increasing numbers of conditions related to progression of liver disease, including cirrhosis and HCC.”

Doing some easy subtraction–Veterans who die of diseases from chronic HCV in 2020, and were infected in 1964, will have had HCV for 56 years according to the natural history of the disease.  

The VA (RO and BVA) and Congress (both parties) know this but shamelessly play games with veterans.

Since most veterans are in private health care (about 75%) is it safe to crudely estimate over 600,000 veterans are being treated for  HCV in private care?

A highly-cited government study of the general population, The Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002 , has promoted the myth that IDU was the main cause of HCV-infections in the 45-65 age birth cohort because 46.6% of those in the study reported IDU at some point in the past.  Although they did note that over 60% of HCV-study participants received transfusions before 1992, by the questions  asked, and more to the point, didn’t ask about medical interventions.  It sure looks and sounds pretty but it’s a lousy biased study!

Miriam J. Alter, PhD., is one of the influential authors.  Her name (and voice in online HCV lectures) surfaces again and again but unfortunately, she’s a researcher with blinders on.  (She is not related to Harvey Alter, a prominent HCV scientist.)  Both the Alters are mentioned in this 20-year-old article: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/19/science/mysterious-epidemic-of-furtive-liver-virus.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

This article references studies that might help track down the origin of HCV in American troops in the ’40s or earlier.

Update:  I changed IVDU to IDU because according to one physician (Pepin, J.) IDU  is an abbreviation that can refer to an injection drug user or intravenous drug user.

Posted in Guest authors, HCV Health, HCV Risks (documented) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

CAVC–SPENCER v. SHINSEKI– PRO SE REVERSAL

VetCourtAppealsPromoAs I mentioned several days ago, spotting a reversal at the Court is always a good yarn to read. Edna C. Spencer’s reads like a professionally written novel. This crusty old lady is nothing if not thorough in pursuing this. That she did it all by herself is nothing short of a miracle.

Edna’s husband, Fred  A. Spencer was a Vet of three wars-WW2, Korea and Vietnam. I’m sure he saw more than he wanted to over all those years. Old Fred got the dementia and old timer’s disease in 95. Edna had to institutionalize him in 99 and by 2000, he was in the dementia unit in Biloxi, Mississippi. When they admitted him-right from the get-go- they noted he was “high fall risk” and that was it. Noted. No effort was made to put up the side rails, install a fallmeter or pad the slab concrete floor. These are all the things you’d do in your own home but not, of course, in a VA hospital that deals with these eventualities every day.

July came and Fred was falling frequently. VA “noted it” frequently. No effort was made to rectify it, though. Finally he was transferred to Kessler AFB’s hospital for a neurological workup because all these falls were beginning to affect him like Humpty Dumpty. By July 21st, things were out of control. Fred refused intervention (like he knew what was going on, right?) and fall protection was finally implemented. Unfortunately all those fall created a few small subdural hematomas that began to grow into big ones.

Fred set sail on his new life’s adventures in August and Edna was fit to be tied. After repeatedly admonishing the VA bubbleheads to be mindful of his dementia and imbalance issues, she was now a widow.

In May of 2001, she filed for DIC using the §1151 defense that VA had, in essence murdered Fred by not protecting him and taking him to a doctor when the most serious fall happened in July 2000. Something weird happened and two, different death certificates were issued-one signed and one not- over a two week period. More about that later.

In February 2003, VA very predictably denied her claim and she filed a NOD. VA saw her NOD and raised her with a VHA opinion from one of their own doctors. He, of course, not wishing to lose his job, seconded the original denial and VA issued the SOC.

Based on this, the BVA denied in October 0f 2005. Edna strapped on her hiking shoes and headed out to 625 Indiana Ave. NW and filed a Notice of Appeal. Mind you, she was doing this all of her own accord with not so much as a raised finger of support from a VSO.

Almost a year later (September 2006) , the VASEC and Edna entered into a Joint Motion to Remand. They agreed, as did the Court, that the IMO from the doctor was defective and thus the Reasons and Bases for the denial were flawed. Instead of justice, Edna was headed over Niagra in a brand new barrel and she wasn’t any the wiser. All she knew was the cause and effect of taking Fred to a charnel house and watching him die.

Sure enough, this story could only get better. VA hired a newbie to do the next IMO. None other  than VA physician Tumkur S. Shivashankara, M.D was brought in to opine that:

…the immediate cause of Mr. Spencer’s death was “Aspiration pneumonia; [and] contributing causes [were]: 1) ischemic heart disease residuals of [coronary artery bypass graft] surgery; 2) Alzheimer’s dementia; [and] 3) chronic subdural hematoma[.]”     Dr. Shivashankara opined that, based on a review of the intensive care unit notes from Keesler Air Force Base Medical Center, Mr. Spencer’s “falls were not as least as likely [as] not . . . contributed [sic] to the proximate cause of death.” R. at 274. Further, Dr. Shivashankara opined that “VA medical personnel[,] including VA night monitors or orderlies, nurses[,] and physicians[ were] not as least as likely as not negligent in [Mr. Spencer’s] care[,]” that it is “not a[t] least as likely as not” that delays and noncompliance with doctor’s orders, alleged by Mrs. Spencer, contributed to Mr. Spencer’s death, and that “the alleged delays and noncompliance . . . [are] not [at] least as likely as not reflect[ive of] carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment[,] or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.”

The ink on Dr.  Shivashankara’s green card wasn’t even dry, his command of English was suspect and here he was opining at great length on Fred’s demise. It wouldn’t surprise me if the good doctor’s field of expertise was gynecology. That would be in keeping with VA’s assignment of IMOs. But this was barely beginning in VA time.

 That same day, a VA report of contact was prepared by VA employee “D. Sisk,” indicating that Dr. Shivashankava’s opinion was not satisfactory and reporting the opinion of “Dr. David Bass, who is the “Geriatric and Extended Care Manager” for the VA South Central Health Care Network. According to that VA report of contact, Dr. Bass stated that, “based upon what he had been told, he felt that there was a ‘lack of comprehensive documentation of some appropriate falls prevention interventions that could have lessened the risk of falling in July 2000.”   Dr. Bass further provided examples of measures that could have been taken, such as “installing a bed monitor on Mr. Spencer’s bed, ensuring that both bed[ ]rails were in the up position at night, or[,] in extreme cases[,] [a] sitter can be assigned to monitor the patient.” Id. The VA report of contact also reported that Dr. Bass stated that a computed tomography scan “would be in order . . . even after a single fall in which a head injury is evident[,]” and that “it is always incumbent upon the treating physician to suspect a possible head injury especially in a dementia patient who might not be able to provide an accurate history of the fall.”

This really threw a wrinkle in the sheet. VA got Tumkur to write bunch more nexus letters all saying pretty much the same thing. Fred had had an out of body experience and never reattached his soul. Alternately, he had a bad chest cold that turned into bronchial pneumonia. Or maybe he was just getting old and this was an inevitable part of life-and death. One thing was for sure-falling down and getting brain owies was not the cause. The RO denied yet again in July of 2008 and Edna hopped back onto the hamster wheel for another trip to the BVA in DC.

The Board made quick work of this and had a denial out by August. Edna once again headed back to the Court and they remanded yet again for a new IMO. VA decided to get someone with a Christian sounding name this time in hopes it would have a more aromatic cache. Dr. Marc Fisher was the new protagonist purchased by VA for this outing. He brushed up Tumker’s nexus and added a few mumbles of his own. Though he was part of the neurology department at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, that in no way, shape or form meant that his specialty was neurology. He could have been a consulting proctologist and VA wasn’t illuminating it one bit.

Here’s where VA overplayed their hand. Dr. Fisher went so far as to say the brain owies from all those falls probably had a lot to do with why old Fred was on number 2 cello in his new gig with the celestial choir but that the death was not due to a lack of care or improper medical procedures. Dumb, Dr. Fisher. Very dumb. You told the truth but you didn’t say it in VAspeak. Twelve years of obfuscation, double-dealing, buying off doctors, hiring new ones and buying them off, ignoring the evidence and finally outright lies had come to a head:

In light of those facts, on February 28, 2013, the Court issued an order that remanded Mrs. Spencer’s case for the limited purpose of having the Board make a factual determination as to whether the failure of VA medical personnel to use bed rails or side rails during Mr. Spencer’s inpatient treatment rises to the level of “carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of the Department in furnishing the hospital care.” 38 U.S.C. § 1151. On March 14, 2013, the Board issued a supplemental decision in response to the Court’s order. In that decision, the Board made the following factual findings:

1. VA medical personnel at the Biloxi/Gulfport VA Medical Center . . . failed to use standard technological interventions for fall prevention (i.e. bed rails/side rails, bed alarms, or fall mats) following [Mr. Spencer’s] first documented fall at the facility in June 2000.

2. VA failed to exercise the degree of care that would be expected of a reasonable health care provider.

The Court read this and promptly reversed the denial. The VASEC threw his hands up and exclaimed. “What gives? I can’t even suborn false testimony without getting my teeth kicked in.” The BVA judge must have been shaken to his core. There went the 2013 bonus. As for the folks at the RO who began this nefarious denial back in 2001? Why, they lived happily ever after (in denial) and spent their summers in Orlando brushing up on their karaoke technique.

So if you think the this whole VA claims gig is over your head and out of your league, just remember Edna C. Spencer, an eighty year old plus woman with no legal training, took on VASECS Gober, Principi, Nicholson, Mansfield , Peake and Shinseki and kicked their asses.  She may not live very long to enjoy her newfound DIC but she sure earned it. Thank you Edna for showing us that God sends the Right.

images

Edna’s most excellent adventures are chronicled here

Edna Spencer’s throwdown

Posted in CAVC ruling, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VSOs–WE DON’T GET NO RESPECT

images (1)

Here’s a lovely story from Member Mark. He’s been in a rough and tumble fight for 13 years with our common adversary and finally prevailed in December 2012. This is no small feat to accomplish under the best of circumstances. Try doing it when you’re sick as a dog and your VSO (California Dept. Of Vet Affairs or CDVA) is not too terribly interested in a hands-on approach.

Mark’s representative, Bob Penny, had been diddling around with this for years when I got involved. Mark and I grabbed the bull by the horns, got the proper evidence into the file, the tattoo photographs blown up and touched up by Cupcake, and assembled the proper regulations to support a grant. Mr. Penny slept through that phase. Mark lost and finally had to do it by appeal to the Board in Washington, DC. I always hate this because it means 3 more years of wait.

Nevertheless, Mark won as I knew he would if he persevered. The law is dispositive on this. If you get the clap, it’s not willful misconduct. It’s a poor choice of a girlfriend for the night but nothing more. Most importantly, it is a risk factor for HCV. VA knew this and thought they could roll Mark. He was pretty sick and wasn’t exactly getting meaningful legal help from  Mr. Penny and the CDVA. As with many, he had no documentation of his tattoo when he separated on his SF88 Physical in block #39. That was a real claim killer. The clap and the picture carried the day but it should have in Oakland where he was filing. Had his VSO been the least bit effectual, it would have occurred locally.

So who should crawl out from under a rock and start bellyaching about all the hard work he did to get Mark service-connected? Just like a bad penny, old Bob is back and now wants his picture together with Mark and a thank you letter for his trophy wall. He probably doesn’t get many successful, hard-to-win claims and this would be a real feather in his cap. It would if he had done something, that is.

I take no credit. Mark is the winner here. He had all the bullets and the gun but nowhere to aim it. Once we sorted it out and wrote it up, VA refused to grant. He had tried for so long and so hard,  they figured they could blow him off. Bob, by now, had joined the Lost In Space Fan Club and was invisible.

This is the third instance of a VSO showing up on a Vet’s doorstep here at asknod demanding his recognition. Multiply this by thousands of pro se Vets who eventually gave up and went out on their own. I think it may be time for Mark and others to go  down to the VSOs and take their pictures so we can publish them here on our Trophy Wall of Shame.

WANTED:

imagesFOR HIGH CRIMES

AND INDIFFERENCE

TO VETERANS CLAIMS

Posted in VSOs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The U. S. veteran HIV puzzle

The DOD began screening applicants for HIV in 1985 and rejected anyone who tested positive.  In those days, it is estimated that a person died from AIDS about 10 years after becoming infected with HIV (J. Pepin).  Each country has a different demographic profile for the epidemic.  As we know, in the U.S., HIV/AIDS was first described in the gay male population and continues to affect the MSM group the most (50%).

One can think about the U. S. military as a country or “transmission category” even if the CDC doesn’t publicly.  This country is made up of mainly old non-white men,  probably heterosexual (although the VA doesn’t collect that data) and like the vast majority of Americans, have never injected illegal drugs into their veins.  Many are also co-infected with HCV.

A few figures from a GAO report about the VHA reveal that there were about 22.2 million living veterans on Sept. 30, 2011 and about 5.2 million veterans received health care from the VHA–or roughly 17 million or 24% if my arithmetic is  correct.  So about 75% of veterans receive their health care outside of the system.

The VA reports that over 25,000 HIV-infected Veterans received health care in VHA.  In  2009,

about 1 of every 250 Veterans in VA health care was living with HIV/AIDS.

If the “1 of every 250” veterans with HIV holds true for veterans being treated outside of the VHA, about 68,000 are infected.  Veteran status looks like a HIV risk factor to me.

This 2011 VA chart is interesting because it shows that most veterans in VHA care are oldies with a median age of 54 and 30% over 60 years.

 HIV Infected Veterans in VHA Care 2011 – Age by Decade of Life

Elderly veterans with HIV

Elderly veterans with HIV

In general, the earlier HAART treatment begins, the longer a person can expect to live so this is a good trend.

This hopeful table is copied from a Harvard article:

In-service tattoos and sexual activity, are certainly important (evidence-based) ways that HIV spread post-1985 although the RO and BVA shoot down claim after claim.  The blood supply/blood products got safer in the early 199os we’re told.

Illicit IV drug users spread blood-borne pathogens like HIV and HCV efficiently but so do all invasive medical procedures that aren’t sterile.  Just today the news reported about a private dentist in Oklahoma who has surrendered his license after an inspection showed that he had exposed his patients to infections like HIV and HCV.  If there was no inspection, there would be no way patients could prove that they were infected in his office, should that be the case.  These nightmarish stories are getting common.

The BVA judges get all gleeful if a veteran with HIV proposes a new in-service risk factor at some point in his claim process.  “Ah HA!, First he said he got HIV from the jet injectors.  Later he said, he said he became infected from combat blood exposure! You loser, go away.  And stay away.”

What the heck!  Are veterans supposed to have honorary degrees in Epidemiology?

Posted in Guest authors, HCV Health, HCV Risks (documented), Jetgun Claims evidence, Medical News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

PROGRESSIVE MEDIA FINALLY BLAME VA BACKLOG ON VA

jon boy speaks

jon boy speaks

In a sudden turnabout, the progressive media are rethinking Bush’s involvement in the backlog. It was revealed yesterday that, contrary to popular belief, it had been going on since before his father’s tenure.  In fact knowledgeable historians inveighed and correctly identified the first backlog as beginning shortly after 1776. The average time by 1866 was over a year.

Jon Stewart took the lead yesterday and launched a tirade in the right direction. W wasn’t exactly exonerated but Haliburton wasn’t mentioned for the first time. VA is now finding it increasingly difficult to keep abreast of all the bad press. What’s next ? Chris Matthews coming down on Eric? Perish the thought. Sequestration will be the guilty party next week. For those of you with tender ears, you may find Jon a little over the top. I didn’t listen as I’ve been briefed on the cause. Please refrain from making any snide political remarks as I will be forced to curb them. I merely report these developments  and present them for your edification. My philosophy is who will help. I care not what flavor tie he wears or where he/she hails from.

Posted in VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

CAVC– 2012 ANNUAL REPORT

CAVC 2012

 

Great little thing to keep handy. When someone tells you you should go barefoot to the CAVC and defend yourself, show them the pro se statistics.

Posted in CAVC Knowledge | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

BVA– MEET JOE BLACK

Here’s a Vet from my home RO who is going to be getting a nasty letter in the mail soon. VA is going to inform him that he is no longer entitled to the presumption of Agent Orange or any other disease that will link his peripheral neuropathy to service unless, of course, it’s on the 3.309(e) list. Since peripheral neuropathy is nowhere to be seen, the rating will be revoked. They won’t dun him for the bucks, but they will make sure he his claim is revoked.

The Walker Decision poked a huge hole in this. Even though he has a lovely nexus letter ascribing it to Agent orange, it isn’t on the 38 CFR §3.309(e) list and will be jerked out as a CUE.

The VLJ is being generous and trying to follow the former interpretation of   §3.303(b) as  they have for aeons. Now that this has been cast on the ash heap of jurisprudence, VA will soon ignore the backlog and race from c-file to c-file  fervently searching for these defective decisions. We will see the fallout in about 3 years when they wend their way through the system and arrive back here in DC.

Of note is whether he’ll be able to keep his “Cloracne” cum actinic keratosis. My guess is the baby will depart with the bath water on this. Both decisions rely heavily on the §3.303(b) language but I see this as the problem

Notably however, the December 2010 VA general medical examination noted that the Veteran suffered from sun-damaged skin over male pattern baldness. He had scars on the bridge of his nose at the site of a basal cell carcinoma excision. He had scars on his left proximal arm and his right forearm that measured two centimeters in diameter on both arms due to basal cell carcinoma excisions. He also had multiple actinic keratoses over the scalp and face. Ultimately, the VA examiner concluded that the Veteran’s skin condition was at least as likely as not due to herbicide exposure during his active military service in Vietnam. See VA General Medical Examination Report, December 17, 2010.

Again, actinic keratosis and basal skin carcinomas are not on the magic list. Simply mumbling that this is related to AO without it being on the list opens any number of diseases to enter in and be rated as due to it. This is exactly what the Secretary has been adamant about for years. He has guarded the gates quite well and now has the Walker decision in his wallet. If you haven’t had this rated for twenty years, you can kiss it goodbye. Since it is a CUE, they will probably find a way to go past 20 and revoke. VA’s greed knows no bounds.

images

dreambucks enroute back to the RO

Posted in BvA Decisions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments