BVA–RAPID TURNOVER OF STAFF ATTORNEYS BODES ILL FOR VETS


My good friend Vicki sent me a link the other day that really rolled my socks down. I was mortified to think how this impacts the backlog at the BVA for docketing our appeals. Mind you, I take some of these internet sites with a wheelbarrow of salt grains. This one would be legitimate from my standpoint. Either that or Notreallyalawyer and his buds are the most elaborate hoaxers of all time.  

 

The website jdunderground.com explores many post doctorate jobs and their focus of law. This particular vein is a discussion of how overprivileged, underworked little snowflakes’ real life crises are dealt with every day in the real world of the VA’s movers and shakers at the Board of Veterans Appeals. Just imagine if all these disgruntled souls were required to be Veterans with at least two continuous years of active duty to qualify for the job.

Check it out.

https://www.jdunderground.com/all/thread.php?threadId=143754

The thought that comes to my mind is…why on earth would any soul with that much knowledge of 38 USC/38CFR squander it all at 810 Yellow Brick Road (at the corner of Delay and Deny)? Why, with that certain knowledge used to deny, could one not eke out an equally above-average financial existence in far less stressful conditions as a … yep… VA attorney for Vets? Pick a state to practice in. It’s not geographically exclusive. No Errors and Omissions insurance. Form an S Corp. and pay 21%. Work from home on your schedule. Learn how to make Macrame Beer hats. Take up Yoga and Yogurt. #Doitdude.

Currently, there are far too many Vets who finally arrive at Hadit and other sites and hear the deja vu rejoinder- “I can’t get ahold of my rep. He won’t return my phone calls.” Hey. Remember those same VSOs have been doing their dangdest to deter the participation of attorneys and private agents in this business since The War of 1812. We get a shot at it after the VSOs finish reducing it to Hamburger Helper at the BVA.  Or, if the Vet finally wakes up to the need for a nexus or IMO, he’s usually waiting in line for a docket number at the BVA and discovering the need on Hadit or here. Ruh-oh Rorge! AstroVet Need Nexus faaaaaaaast!

The obvious 800-lb. gorilla in the VA living room  is war-continuous war in Southwest Asia. It is now becoming an inter-generational phenomenon. Fathers who served in 1991  have sons serving in Afraqistan. Count ’em folks. 17 years of on again, off again combat not to mention a shit ton of PTSD claims. This phenomenon has been variously described as ‘the lump in the python’ to  VA’s descriptive Adobe 9- “an unforeseen  seventeen year glitch in the statistics which no one could have programmed in to the equation.” VA fully expects this cohort to begin decreasing in 2019 based on their prediction models.

Business demand hates a vacuum. Someone will fill it. NOVA ought to advertise there. Imagine if you turned loose two or three thousand more attorneys into this VA fray. Seems like the easiest to train to think pro-Vet rather than the obverse would be those already entrusted with our appeals. Oddly, in most cases, it boils down to whipping up a good IMO at the BVA at the eleventh hour to save the day. Always remember. In ex parte jurisprudence, you want to be the very last to submit your killer IMO. This deprives those BVA staff attorneys of the opportunity to rebut it at the eleventh hour.  Protect it from a remand back to the AOJ and those chowderheads are going to be forced to eat it in order to make their 2.5 appeals per day quota.

I was taught once by a warrior to always think about how your opponent operates. What is his/her Prime Directive? What motivates them? How do your defeat them or neutralize them as a threat? What are their ROEs? If you know their limits, you can exploit them. In the legal jungle, you bide your time and they’ll eventually let their guard down.

VA raters and DROs are not morons but they do have a propensity to deny all but the most obvious without clear and convincing evidence to rebut their mistakes. Absent even rudimentary bipartisanship, you make your stand at the BVA. Present a good VA 9 argument and a SME review and a waiver of review in the first instance at the VARO to keep the DRO’s mitts off it. Sit back, remodel the kitchen and convert the garage into that fourth bedroom w/ bath. Before you know it the oldest kid is ready for college and you get TDIU and P&T. Problem solved.

The teaching lesson today is to give these tired overworked, mentally stressed out VA staff attorneys an easy way out and a simple path to your success that they feel they figured out by themselves with Phonics®. Arrange it so they can ‘sound it out’ legally. In truth, the last thing Veterans of all stripes want to see is an exodus from the BVA’s staff ranks. Golly, no. The backlog would become enormouser.

About asknod

VA claims blogger
This entry was posted in BvA and VARO CUE DECISIONS, BvA Decisions, BvA HCV decisions, Food for thought, IMOs/IMEs, KP Veterans, NOVA Attorneys, Tips and Tricks, VA Agents, VA Attorneys, vARO Decisions, Veterans Law, Waiver of Review in the First Instance and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to BVA–RAPID TURNOVER OF STAFF ATTORNEYS BODES ILL FOR VETS

  1. apskywalker says:

    Unless a miracle occurs in the next month, I will never again use the DRO route. The fact that the VBA recommends it is enough to make it suspect (what, like they’re going to disagree with their own co-workers?). They’ve now successfully wasted 2.5 years of our time so far ok what amounts to an open and shut 4 page claim.

  2. After reviewing “The letter” and picking at numerous comments from some of these “unfortunate souls”; I “should” be disheartened albeit I am somewhat encouraged since. 1. IT confirms what I suspected already. 2. Currently being in the Queue for a/the BVA “Final Decision” on a post Remand Appeal of 2015 which origin is 2006 and certified there, I am expecting another denial and another day (LOL) on/in the CAVC; maybe even in 2018??? However THIS time we have ample material “new evidence” which should make our voyage rather interesting; as with their current “schedule” to push cases through, there is NO way they could possibly adequately review my file with this new evidence in the time period now constrained to/by their efforts.

  3. Gary Butler says:

    I could of guessed based on my recent appeal. It was a win but the decision was almost as bad as the original improper reduction. They claimed “The Issue” was restoration of a rating. Not whether the reduction was proper. Later they said the reduction was improper but it did not reference Greyzck v. West and say it was void ab initio (as if never happened). That is important as 20% of the 40% rating is now protected under 38 CFR 3.951 (b) [20 year protection], and my hernia disability will not be reduced below 20% except upon a showing that the rating was based on fraud. Which of course means they were mistaken when they said it was an unprotected rating. They did not carefully read the original decisions (2) or the SOC on the reduction and egregiously misstated the facts. I was think of requesting reconsideration but am now considering appealing to the court. I want a remand for initial adjudication for an issue raised for the first time in the appeal (Pro Se). This would included TDIU / Extra-Schedular rating and a couple of 38 CFR 3.157 informal claims based on hospitalization for a rated disability at the time of hospitalization which were of record.

  4. Finally! Something tangible (or not) about the BVA! After due (actually reading/comprehending) diligence I may comment albeit I do have immense sympatico for those (approx.) 400,000 behind me; many if not most of whom believe that the V.A. (or the BVA in this) is actually working in THEIR interest!! Land-o-Goshen; miracles abound; just not there.

  5. Kiedove says:

    I have just scanned some of the posts from the fall to January. Incredible, although I agree with one poster that someone may be a troll.
    Never the less, I noticed this letter signed by 100 attorneys in September with complaints.
    https://www.afge.org/contentassets/a91c998d3be44362a75c5c67c60852f7/loss-of-confidence-statement.pdf
    I hope these attorney’s are still working but I agree that the whole quota system is wrong and some of the back claims should be solved at the RO.
    Vicky, thank you for this incredible research.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s