Not to be outdone by the AOJs, BVA spokeswoman Sharon “Hell No” Hellman, recently promoted and transferred in from Phoenix to 810 Yellow Brick Rd. NW 20420, today held an important press event. Sure enough, at the corner of Delay Street and Deny Avenue, Ms. Hellman announced the roll out of the new Fully Developed Appeal and what to expect soon.
Said Hellman”Due to Director Laura Eskinazi’s unparalleled success with the Rocket Docket program, we were able to jettison, er, remand 25% of our backlog onto the AOJs in FY 2014. Sadly, it didn’t make any difference. Hey, we get it. The BVA appeal backlog is expanding exponentially like that National Debt clock in Times Square. Ms. Eskinazi has correctly identified the problem was Congress’ decision in 2007. They had no business letting attorneys into this process at the drop of the denial word. Now, because of NOVA and the NVLSP intransigence and insistence on real law, it takes four years to get an appeal decision. Everyone thinks they got dissed at their RO these days and Veterans’ lawyers aren’t doing anything to dispel the myth. To add insult to injury, they continue to clog the system with foolish, meritless appeals.”
Ms. Hellman’s assistant, Mr. W. E. Gunn went on to explain the process in more detail:
“The new Fully Developed Claims Process at the AOJ was built on the 125-day “develop to deny” theorem. Consequently, VAROs were clearing their backlog books and merely transferring the problem to us. Punting to the BVA on fourth and long was, and is, unfair. Two can play that game so we simply punted back and remanded 25% of the certified claims back for whatever we could find wrong. In any event, it was to no avail. Therefore, VA stakeholders convened at an unnamed Orlando luxury resort this spring and came up with some innovative ideas on how to fix the intractable problem.
“First of all, the BVA prefers the term “Rapid Remands Program” over the boorish “Rocket Docket” vernacular coined by Veterans Law Judge Kelli Kordach. It more properly describes the process in terms Veterans and their representatives can assimilate. VA product testers insist it has that same catchy caché as “rapid rewards program” and Veterans are more liable to misinterpret it as such.
“In order to eliminate the backlog for certification and appeal permanently, however, Ms. Eskinazi proposes the new Fully Developed Appeal or FDA for short. FDAs can also be decided within 125 days with 98% accuracy as soon as the VBA can run it up the flagpole in the Federal Register. VA will propose that Veterans, through their VSOs, summarize, in 300 words or less, why they think they should prevail. Their lay testimony will be accepted without regard to credibility, they are free to opine medically on their symptoms and in all cases the benefit of the doubt will be employed assiduously as it always has in the past. Since most Veterans and their representatives are functionally illiterate, most will not need all three hundred words to communicate their desires. In fact, few, if any VSOs, will actually see any change in the process except for the accelerated time to a decision. This is a win-win for all.
“BVA law judges will decide these cases within 125 days or the Veteran wins by default. What could be more fair? There will be no Reasons or Bases section to explain the decision. There will be no legal cites. The 125-day process will commence when the BVA officially acknowledges it has. It is up to the Veteran’s representative to ascertain that date so as to avoid a failure to timely appeal. The decision will be a bare bones one-either thumbs up or thumbs down in much the same way the VA ran this show before the VJRA was enacted in 1988. The VBA proposes putting a thumbs up on all grants of compensation with a Smiley Face. They will be affixed to the Rating Decision envelopes. BVA psychiatrists tell us this improves Veterans perception of VA fairness and “balance”.
“Should the Veteran or his representative desire a copy of the denial, we propose to attach the denial decal (ULUZ) to alert the Veteran of the impending depressing news. Far too many Vets get their Big Brown Envelopes (BBEs) expecting a win. Since this only happens 15% of the time, it would only be fair to prevent getting their hopes up.
If by some mira- ah- if the Veteran prevails, his/her claims file will be returned to the AOJ and a rating decision will be promulgated within six months or as expeditiously as possible after that. Should they lose, they will receive no notice. This is established VA law currently anyway and called “deemed denial”. It will be up to the Veteran or his designated VSO to contact the AOJ within sixty days of the expiration of the 125-day time limit to determine the loss and file the Notice of Agreement (NOA) with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Failure to do so will void the right to appeal to the CAVC. To simplify the process, Veterans or their representatives can mail in a self-addressed and stamped envelope within the sixty day period to ascertain the status. VA will promptly mail out a response in the envelope provided. Failure to affix postage to said envelope will be construed as noncompliance with the FDA offer and automatically renders it null and void.
Any failure to comply within the sixty day limit following the designated 125-day decision phase will not be granted equitable tolling. To take advantage of the FDA offer, the Veteran or his representative must file the VA 9 within 14 days of issuance of the SOC or SSOC at the AOJ. The request must be checked off legibly on the VA 9 and specifically enumerate which claims have been chosen for FDA status. The maximum number of appeals for an FDA is two (2) claims. Again, the strict word limit is three hundred per claim for a maximum of six hundred words over two. The address on the envelope will count towards the word limit (40 words). All claims must be sent to:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cheeseville Intake Center
Building Number Six
Intake Loading Dock # 78
Attention: Fully Developed Appeals Supervisor/ Deputy Fully Developed Appeals Supervisor
Rule 900 Expedite (Optional) Yes [ ] No [ ] (check one)
Cheeseville, Wisconsin 86739-2440
Misaddressed mail to Regional Offices or the Board of Veterans Appeals will be forwarded to the Cheeseville address but the VA cannot, and will not, guarantee delivery within the 14- day time limit to protect the Veterans’ appeal. The above address is the only one approved. The date stamp, in any event, will be the deterministic metric. Equitable tolling is not for application with FDA claims.
At this time,VA is not able to extend this process to pro se Veterans or attorneys licensed to practice law with the Department of Veterans Affairs. This offer is only open to Veterans represented by the 146 Veterans Service Organizations currently chartered with Congress. We hope this will bring relief to hundreds of thousands of Veterans who are currently disenfranchised by the long waits. This equitable process is nonadversarial, Veteran friendly and will be a long-awaited shortcut to speedy BVA justice. VSOs have long advocated removal of attorneys from this process as they are preying on gullible Veterans. We agree and the VA Secretary Bob concurs that to allow lawyers into the FDA process would merely throw more sand in the gears of BVA justice with no benefit accruing to the Veteran.
A comment period will begin today for sixty days and then VA will begin to institute the proposed changes. Thank you for your time. We have brochures on this but the printer ran out of ink. I’ll make sure all interested parties get copies of this briefing as expeditiously as possible. I hope that clears up any confusion on the new FDA.”
P.S. I am forced to add this postscript to say this is more of my humor. I honestly thought everyone would catch that. Apparently not. I assure you there is no such thing as a Fully Developed Appeal which is not to say Ms. Eskinazi won’t plagiarize my idea and create one. Amen
P.P.S. And then along came RAMP two years later… I can’t make this stuff up fast enough!
I wonder if I can sue the VA for plagiarism now that they instituted the AMA. It strongly resembles my model in more ways than one.
Reblogged this on nevertoolate2015.
You had me for a minute there, Chief!
But don’t be fooled, while organizations like the DAV allegedly sue the VA over the new claims forms, they are (I have heard) been quietly pushing for an Fully Developed Appeal process that allows Veterans to trade due process for faster denials at the BVA.
Meanwhile, legislation that proposes allowing the Veterans claim to pass to the Veterans estate (a bill that would end the ability to “deny ’til we die” approach) languishes in Committee in the House of (mis)Representatives.
Chris, A group from Yale is suing on behalf of a Veteran as to the length of time for a decision on his case. If, cross your fingers, he wins this might bring even more attorneys into the fold to help more Vets which is always a good thing. Win/win as far as I am concerned.
Only problem with this is that they are actually proposing a Fully Developed Appeal . . . see H.R. 800, the “Express Appeals Act” which has been fully endorsed by the VA and DAV.
Two questions we can take from this news. Have you ever seen VA do anything a) right the first time or b) fast?
Very funny yet very scary. Made me laugh and my skin crawl at the same time…
WHAT, Hay I have a Idea, Never join the Service, To bad that will not Help US, These are the same people that run the Post Office, I guess there will be NO Vets Left to Protect Our Country, when the Crap hits the Fan, Could that be There Plan all along? I think so, Take your Vaccines, Meds, and just go away and Die and the VA will Love you.
The real trouble is at the VARO where poorly trained claims examiners deny claims when in doubt and send them to the BVA. I spent 8 years from the start of a claim until it was finally denied at the federal court of appeals. I had a DRO hearing at the VARO six years ago. The DRO was not allowed to make a decision that addressed the claim. It was easier just to deny it and send it on its way through a system so adversarial that it would be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than to get a fast and final decision. To my mind every vet who is not really expert needs a lawyer at the BVA and beyond.
AskNod
I think you should write another book just on the appeals process beyond the VARO. If you lose a claim at the VARO, and you appeal, you enter a hall of mirrors and you can stay lost for years. How does the 22 year old vet or the elderly vet in poor health ever prevail in such a system? I know how I fared as a 22 year old vet confronting a system so adversarial that I did not know if I was coming or going.
Translation Robert – We get screwed again but they are allowing us to comment on why we think we are getting screwed and then they move forward and approve more layers to make sure even more of us die off prior to receiving justice.
I don’t understand a damn thing you said. Speak english man, when dealing with something as important as this, your humor is not so humorous but humorless. If you want to be commended for your wit then I commend you funny guy, but some veterans will have a hard time following you on your translation of rule and law.
Aw, Robert. Say it ain’t so. All this effort at humor/poking fun at the VA and it was all lost on you? I apologize for the boring legalese. I have to write for the median intelligence who come here. Shooting for the lowest common denominator would drive most of my readership away.
You know, you are actually right. The department is working with Congress to try to develop a Fully Developed Appeal process. It requires the law to change so that’s why Congress has to be involved.
Hey, I represent that statement!