Tag Archives: 39 CFR 3.156(b) case law

CAVC–MITCHELL v McDONALD–THE NEVER-ENDING BERAUD REDUX

Ever since the Bond v. Shinseki dustup that had to travel to the Fed. Circus for clarification, we see the VA’s continued intransigence toward the concept of new evidence submitted in that golden window either with the NOD or within the … Continue reading

Posted in 38 CFR § 3.156(b), CAVC ruling, Important CAVC/COVA Ruling | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment