BVA–DECISION MAILED

I checked the BVA website to see if there had been any progress on my appeal and discovered I no longer have appeals pending at the Board. Two decisions are to be announced tomorrow and one was decided a year ago on May 4th, 2011. As most know, the BVA releases all decisions on appeal simultaneously rather than piecemeal. The site says they are en route to my VAMC for “development”.

P.S. Update Thursday 0900. I called BVA and they have mailed the decision out already. I expect to receive it Saturday or early next week. I’l publish it here regardless of how ugly it might be. I’m an optimist so I believe it’ll be a win on all four counts-Back/hips 1989 CUE , HCV/PCT EED and Tinnitus EED from 1994. So what if I lose. That’s what the CAVC was invented for.

Posted in BvA and VARO CUE DECISIONS, BvA HCV decisions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

SEARO & OAKRO closed to new claims.

I was told Tuesday by my VR&E counselor that the Seattle and OaklandVAROs  are no longer accepting new claims. All claims are being rerouted to Salt Lake City and other VAROs with less of a backlog. Brilliant. How about outsourcing them to a subcontractor? I guess that might put someone out of work if it was revealed that the civilian counterpart to a prestigious all-paper bureaucracy was more efficient, accurate and timely.

So if some of you discover you are getting your denials on Salt Lick City’s VARO literature, relax. It took about two months to send the records there Pony Express. And, I presume Vets understand SLC has it’s own backlog albeit not so long. Any NODs will have to still be routed through SEARO. It will be like a private Claims Management Center in another state-gee… just like the AMC, huh? Somebody probably got promoted for that one.

Posted in VA BACKLOG, vA news | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

How to stop a nightmare.

Member Cal sends us this bit of wisdom. For your viewing pleasure, see how to stop a nightmare and nip it in the bud.

People ask me why I include these vignettes in a HCV forum and I ask right back–“Do you know how depressing it is to be sick with a disease like this? It actually provokes depression as one of it side effects.” And that, ladies and gentlemen Vets, is why I do things like this.

Posted in Food for the soul, Humor | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Footlocker Beginnings.

360004091_lgBack in the beginning when I arrived in SEA, I saw the need for a weapon up country that actually worked as advertised. The .45 ACPs could do this but, as with all semi-autos, they became a casualty of red clay. It got into everything including the gas tanks on the aircraft and was the reason for more than one unscheduled engine shutdown.

On the other side of the fence, no one checked to see what you carried and whether it had approved ball ammunition. I had a choice of a .38 M&P, a FN Hi-Power or a S&W Mod 39 in 9mm.  I asked a sibling to send me this one with 500 rounds of 158-grain jacketed hollowpoints. It was purchased at an unknown San Francisco gun shop (back when such a thing existed) in early July 1970. I brought it home with me in 1972 under my fatigue shirt in its shoulder holster. Like all AirAm gunslingers, we notched the butt when a memorable event occurred.

Cost in 1970? $89.95 NIB with BankAmericard. Shoulder holster free with the purchase of 500 rounds of ammo. Footlocker value in 2012? Priceless.

Back in 1993 when you could take guns to school legally, my daughter took this for her high school history “show and tell”. I delivered it to the front office and they took it up to the classroom and gave it to her. She brought it home with her that afternoon in her backpack. The times they are a changing.

 

Posted in From the footlocker | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ILP– What about the Greenhouse?

Into everyone’s life a little rain must fall. My VRE case worker and I-he who granted me the computer-had a meet and greet this morning. He declined my offer of coffee laced with hemlock. He quickly started circling the wagons when I broached the subject of a NOD and accompanying administrative review of the greenhouse  request in my May 2011 filing.

Mr. H has a propensity to quote the party line without supporting it with CFRs. This should come as no surprise to any of us. It’s ingrained in them. Thus, when queried if I could accept the program with the computer and still file a NOD, he started stuttering. This was not discussed earlier and dissatisfaction was not voiced at the time of denial. His desire was to get the documents signed and beat a hasty retreat. When queried on whether VA intended to include a $200 LexisNexis Veterans Benefits manual (digital-on disc), he said that was vocational material only supplied to VSOs. As my grant was for communication with the outside world, I had no “need” for it. Huh?

When denied last November, it was based on this being an avocational pursuit.  After a lengthy NOD, they approved it this April. The IT guy based his whole rationale for what he was providing me on this website. Therefore when Mr. H informed me that this wasn’t the reason for the grant, he felt very comfortable saying I had no need for vocational interests as I was unemployable.

That brought forth a vociferous explanation that only three people are legally entitled to advocate for a Vet other than himself. A VA approved lawyer, a VSO and another VETERAN are all equal to the task. He became more and more uncomfortable with the tenor of my plaint. When I reached the greenhouse matter, he became visibly upset. Since the two requests are stand alones, they are individually appealable. Much like a comp/pen claim, abandoning it and coming back later to reopen it will be immeasurably harder. When asked to confirm that acceptance of computer would in no way endanger a NOD for the greenhouse, he became evasive and started the “that all depends on what the meaning of “is” is”. I parsed it in several different manners and finally he acquiesced and allowed as it could be done this way but was underhanded and somewhat of a sneak attack.  The idea was to get this ILP thing under control and hear no more about it. Au contraire, ma cher. We have just begun.

I was in contact with another disabled Veteran who contributes to one of our sister Vet’s sites. I idly asked if he hadn’t received ILP benefits when the cat jumped out of the bag. Not only had he received benefits, VA had granted virtually all that he asked for. I cut and paste here:

What I found with the ILP is that in order to get approved for any specific product or service, I had to be able to define why I needed that product. If you have the ILP definition from the VA or CFR, it describes what areas (Needs) should be fullfilled.
Medical, assistive technology, avocational (hobbies) community involvement, recreational, and daily living activities .

They got the following items for me:
ADT Security system with 2 years of monitoring w/alert pendant
Food processor
Several cooking appliances like a small convection oven (we have a gas range, not so compatible with morphine) grill, and a couple other small things
Fishing gear (my Veteran buddies like taking me fishing a few times a year)
Cannon Rebel Camera with 2 nice lenses, backpack, tripod and training tools.
There are some other items as well, like an electric toothbrush and cleaning items. My hands are very arthritic and it is hard to use a manual toothbrush.
A Kindle with carrying case.
A very nice mattress and memory foam topper pad.
It took over 2 years to get 1 item, but once I started requesting items based on my individual disabilities, and some of those requests were backed up by my private physicians, then the IL case manager really started to help.
Took a lot of work, and a lot of research, but was well worth it in the end.

I researched some of this before Mr. H arrived and I was quick to point out why the ILP program existed and what Congress intended when they passed it in 1984. The VA has truncated it and tried to lock it in the attic like a mentally challenged sibling but the information continues to trickle out.

Our fellow Vet proves the largesse is far more forthcoming in Portland than Seattle. This was why I have decided to stand my ground. Using bait and switch to grant and then claim the computer is not to help Vets but to stay in contact with the outer world is disingenuous on their part. Thus no VBM from LexisNexis.

Congress intended this benefit to accrue to Vets whose disabilities were above and beyond those with minor disabilities. Mine precludes going out into sunlight no matter how thick the zinc oxide is slathered on. In winter, the cryoglobulinemia restricts my excursions outside due to the pain in the extremities. Due to the fact that dizziness from the phlebotomies and anemia weaken me every month, I am a captive in my own domain.

VA keeps reverting the conversation back to avocational interests being precluded, but can supply no particulars as to why this is not permitted. Now they have relented. A greenhouse, to my way of thinking, keeps me entertained on site and allows me to live independently by reducing my dependence on Safeway. Mr. H does not share that sentiment so I will have to write another one of my famous letters explaining what the definition of “avocational” is and also recreational pastimes. I wonder if they make an artificial insemination device for fruit trees?  A new reloader with all the dies for my favorite calibres would be in order , too. It would make me truly independent if the balloon goes up and I find myself isolated from society. Why the possibilities are endless. They’re getting off cheaply, too. I put in the indoor shooting range when I built the house.

I think our Portland Vet said it best when he summed it up thusly:

Once you get the idea of why you NEED products, then it gets easy to actually explain it to someone who is not in your condition. That was one of the biggest hurdles I made in my plan, I got the counselor, who is a clinical psychologist to understand that there is no way that he can actually understand the needs I have. Without being totally disabled in my early 40’s, some days not even being able to drive or walk, I got it through his head that the only people who can actually honestly say they understand what my needs are is someone who is disabled in a similar manner, and even then they are not exactly like me and my family so there really is no comparison he can make.

Read them and weep, vA. The new computer comes in two weeks. 5 hours have been allocated for training in five increments. Then we’ll see about the greenhouse and a camera. I actually have a hand me down I’ve been shooting with recently so I may have to give the reloader more thought.

Posted in Independent Living Program, Tips and Tricks, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Mythbusters Online: Are we buying the vA excuses?

Most of us have seen the show “Mythbusters”, where two rather skilled mechanics perform some stunts to decide if a particular situation, often in movie stunts, were “real” or fake.

Well, Im not taking over their show, but there are a few myths running around about the vA that are not true.  I will look at one of these myths today.  Maybe, some more later.  Keep reading Ask nod to find out.

The vA often cites “the number of troops in two wars” as their excuse for the backlog, when Veterans advocates complain about the growing backlog of health care and compensation benefits at the Va.      Myth Busted.  There were more troops in Vietnam than in IRAQ and Afghanastan together.   Way more.

Here are the numbers:

Iraq and Afghanastan 161,000 source:  see page 6: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40682.pdf

Vietnam:  (1968) 536,100   source:   http://www.americanwarlibrary.com/vietnam/vwatl.htm

So, as you can see its “myth busted”.   We had more than 3 times as many troops in Vietnam than in the current wars and Im not buying the Va’s “blame the Veteran” excuses.

Posted in Complaints Department, Guest authors, VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Jesus In Retrospect

There were 3 good arguments that Jesus was Black:

1. He called everyone brother
2. He liked Gospel
3. He didn’t get a fair trial

But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was Jewish:

1. He went into His Father’s business
2. He lived at home until he was 33
3. He was sure his Mother was a virgin and his Mother was sure He was
God

But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was Italian:

1. He talked with His hands
2. He had wine with His meals
3. He used olive oil

But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was a Californian:

1. He never cut His hair
2. He walked around barefoot all the time
3. He started a new religion

But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was an American Indian:

1. He was at peace with nature
2. He ate a lot of fish
3. He talked about the Great Spirit

But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was Irish:

1. He never got married.
2. He was always telling stories.
3. He loved green pastures.

But the most compelling evidence of all – 3 proofs that Jesus was a woman:

1. He fed a crowd at a moment’s notice when there was virtually no food
2. He kept trying to get a message across to a bunch of men who just
didn’t get it
3. And even when He was dead, He had to get up because there was still
work to do.

Happy Mother’s Day from the Noodle Krewe.

Posted in General Messages, Humor | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Terry W. Lindsey-Milestones

Another Vietnam Veteran bites the dust at 58 years old. Pretty soon we’ll all be gone and the  vA can declare jetguns the cause of HCV. Rest in Peace Terry. A grateful nation of Vets salutes you and mourns your passing.  Two years have passed but the pain will linger a lifetime.

Posted in All about Veterans, Milestones | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

To DRO Or Not To DRO

There are as many viewpoints on DROs as there are Veterans.   Many of us, according to the GAO, are not “fully informed” of our choices:

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11812.pdf

When a Veteran gets a RO decision and decides to appeal the decision, he has to make a choice of whether or not to have his decision reviewed by a Decision Review Officer (DRO) or, send his claim directly to the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA).    Further, he needs to decide if he wants a hearing or not.

I think there is a Catch 22 in this report that we may have missed.   In a nutshell, if you have new and material evidence, then the DRO can grant your benefits if supported by it.  However, at least from an “official” position, because of stare decisis, the DRO can’t grant any new benefits unless there is new and material evidence.   This is “hidden” on page 6, buried in the “flow chart” where it says,

“If new evidence, reviews and may make new decision
If no new evidence, sends appeal to Board

If we fully beleive this GAO report, then your VSO is highly likely to recommend a DRO review.  Further, according to the report,

In fiscal years 2003 through 2008, 21 percent of DRO reviews resulted in a full grant of benefits compared to 17 percent of traditional reviews

In summary, my take on this is if you have new and material evidence, go ahead and ask for a DRO review…you just may be awarded benefits.  However, if you do not have new and material evidence, you are unlikely to get your benefits awarded by the DRO.  It would be best to save yourself about 260 days of waiting and go directly to the Board of Veterans appeal.

I just wonder why VSO’s have not figured this out, after all, I am just a Joe Average Vet.

Posted in DRO and BVA Hearings, Guest authors, Tips and Tricks, Uncategorized, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VA–Claim Delays And Mistakes

Congress has “still another meeting” to “fix” VA mistakes and delays.

http://vetlawyers.com/vetblog/index.php/2012/05/congresswoman-meets-with-veterans-over-va-claim-delays-and-mistakes/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=F

So, how does the VA fix its mistakes?

A few times in my life I have “called” my wife (or kids) and asked them to do me a favor.  When they inquire as to “What is the favor?”   I respond, “I have a twenty dollar bill that I did not have time to spend.  Could you try to find the time to spend it for me?”

They dont seem to mind spending it.  I have noticed it is always easier to spend others money than to spend your own.  Case in point is the VA claim delays and mistakes.  Who pays for these claim delays and mistakes?  Well, Veterans do, of course.  We loose our homes to forclosure.  We become homeless.  We are forced to forgo necessities even for our children because we simply have not received our compensation from the VA.

So, how then should we “fix” claim delays and mistakes?  As long as “somebody else” pays (the Veteran) they will continue.  If those mistakes came out of the VA supervisors’ bonuses, watch them stop pronto.

Posted in General Messages, Guest authors, Uncategorized, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment