Welcome to the Hotel Montana

horn·swog·gle  (hôrnswgl)

transitive verb.

horn·swog·gled, horn·swog·gling, horn·swog·gles Chiefly Northern & Western U.S.

To bamboozle; deceive.

I have not so fond memories of an old friend who gradually became pathetically power hungry in his own small fiefdom. Roger married Barb to run her life. When she accidentally became pregnant early in their relationship, he convinced her to put it up for adoption. This pretty much set the trend for all that happened later. When they did eventually have children, Roger picked the names. He’s the only guy I’ve known who named his son after his favorite whiskey(Ezra Brooks). He named his daughter Bailey and I assume that was after the famed Irish creme. Can you imagine if he was an aficionado of Tequila or vodka?

He’d get you to spill the beans on something and then milk it for all he could. Once I was rewiring a house and he he found out where and showed up. He convinced the homeowner things needed repairs and the next thing I knew he was working there too. Soon, he’d become the de facto general contractor and start telling me what to do. I kept my cards much closer to my chest after that.

Roger eventually moved back to Montana even though Barb had a killer job in Seattle. He was self-employed and she went where he did. Period. Later, when funds got tight in the late 90’s, she came back over here to work occasionally and help make ends meet.  I assume she ran it by Roger first or else he suggested it.

I had a bad fall off a ladder on Labor day weekend in 1994. I was off work for five months. My left arm no longer had an elbow socket and was (and still is) held together with plates, screws and a stainless steel spring. I called Roger up to see what deer hunting was like over there. I couldn’t pack an animal out of the rough, so I was hoping there might be some easy pickings over there.  Lucky me. I was regaled with the ultra-cheap price of non-resident hunting licenses ($35.00).  Deer were so plentiful you could shoot them in his front yard- right off the porch the way he told it. This sounded like it was too good to be true. If only I’d known.

I packed up and left the day after voting. I literally flew over the mountains and dutifully made a right turn off I-90 at Missoula. I hit Hamilton several hours later just at dark. Roger wasn’t kidding. I just about clobbered Rudolph and 8 of his buddies as I turned in the driveway. This was shaping up to be the finest hunting trip I’d ever been on. You could sit on the front porch with a TNT and take your pick. As we used to say up country in Laos, this was a target-rich environment.  As they say down at the  rental car place, “Well, not exactly.”

As soon as dinner was over I got the first bit of bad news. I’d be sleeping on the living room floor because the fourth bedroom wasn’t completed yet. I always travel with the mattress pad and sleeping bag so this wasn’t a problem.  The next bit of news was still workable.  He allowed that yes, you could technically “shoot” them in the front yard but, well, not exactly.The deer out front had names. There would be no more talk of shooting deer in the front yard. Roger didn’t know how close I came to harvesting one as I arrived with my trusty .357 S&W nicknamed AMEX (never leave home without it). I decided to keep mum on that. A further query of whether it would be permissible to shoot these deer in another yard, say over at brother John’s house across the pasture, was met with  a stern denial. Nevertheless, with a deer population this numerous, punching the ticket was going to be a cake walk. Right? Well, not exactly.

Everyone left early for work/school the next morning and I was left to sleep in. After breakfast, I noticed all the clocks were an hour late so I reset them. Baaaaad idea. Roger apparently didn’t believe in Daylight Savings Time. I had made the cardinal error of failing to run it by him first. I was excoriated for changing them that afternoon and warned to keep my mitts off them henceforth. It seemed I needed to learn a lot in a short period of time if this was going to work out. Barb suggested before I did anything around there that I should  run it by Roger first. She said she always did and it saved a lot of time.  Good idea.

The next day we all (his brother,too) went out for breakfast at a greasy Casino in town. The sporting goods store was adjacent so we strolled over after the breakfast which I bought for all. This was where things started to break down. Come to find out, Hamilton was in an Archery only county. No guns. Period. It was suggested to me that maybe I should buy archery equipment there at the store. They had scads of it. I reminded Roger my left arm was little more than attached to my shoulder at this juncture. Archery was not going to be my strong suit-ever.

After several nights, Roger decided that my camping out in the living room wasn’t going to work. He didn’t have a farm but got up and watched the farm report at 0dark30. I was sleeping in the living room and this interfered with  early morning TV.  I was told I’d enjoy it far more over to brother John’s. John was shopping wife #2 and his 3,000 Sq. foot monstrosity was a chick magnet in progress, too. However, Hamilton Montana was probably a poor place to bait the trap. He had his whole wood-working shop inside in the area some day to be called the kitchen. He also hadn’t put bird blocks in between the rafters so we had flying squirrels  falling down from  the vaulted ceiling riding R-19, pink insulation surfboards. Rather than install the bird/squirrel blocks, he’d dutifully get the stepladder out and replace the insulation several times a day. His heating system consisted of a space heater in his bedroom. That was also the only sheetrocked room in the house. The rest, including the future attic was at the mercy of a wood stove. I was the guest of honor on the living room sofa. If I desired heat, it meant getting up several times in the night to stoke the fire box and refuel it. Quite oddly, I was not required to run the firewood procedure by Roger at 0200 hrs.

John didn’t have a filter for his water yet so it smelled like sewage and was decidedly discolored. It was the hardest thing I ever did to take a shower in it. I insisted on going over to Roger’s to get drinking water. Naturally-you guessed it- I had to run that by Roger first.

Hunting involved getting up at the screech of dawn and chaining up to go over Chief Joseph’s Pass at about 80,000 feet above sea level.  “Hunting” was in crunchy white, 24 inch deep snow 100+ miles away. They had a greasy spoon over there in that podunk town too where I was allowed to buy breakfast for John. He’d graciously agreed to be my guide and food taster by now. Business was slow in winter and I was a welcome diversion.  We did this for two days. We also never saw any deer and it was about 20 degrees below civilized out. Did you know your snot freezes in your nose in that environment?

The third day dawned with thick, new snow and Roger suggested John and I should go out and cruise the roads for road-kill deer since I didn’t feel like driving so far. John felt that was a sooooper idea and suggested roads in the vicinity of restaurants.  I could see where this was heading. They also suggested I buy their resident hunting licenses so I could load up on lots of roadkill to take home. By now I’d heard the one phrase over ten thousand times. If I so much as suggested that I was going to go down to town to get smokes, Barb or John would chime in with “Sounds good but I’d run it by Roger first.” The same stock phrase emerged if I contemplated calling Cupcake, taking a shower, or going anywhere in the neighborhood to see other friends who had moved over there. I never succeeded in seeing his (and my) old friend Nick. Maybe Roger murdered him. I couldn’t even get his telephone number out of John. His suggestion was -you guessed it-You may want to check with Roger first.  Roger would demur and say “All in good time, Buckwheat. You just got here.  Maybe we’ll have a poker game”. At some point I started trying to interject humor into this. I proposed going to the bathroom and asked John if that required checking in with Roger. I got a queer look and “Huh? Why would you need to do that?” The humor was completely lost on him.

After sitting around all day the fourth day doing nothing, I elected to call a friend and find out how soon he was bugging out for elk hunting back in Washington. This Montana  hunting gig required checking in with Roger too much. I did it on my cel phone (in spite of the roaming charges) to avoid having to get Roger’s permission for the land line. It made little difference. John overheard the conversation and promptly called Roger up and told him I was leaving to go back. Roger roared back from his job site and started telling me I couldn’t leave because I hadn’t even been there a week yet. Yeah, the hunting hadn’t been the best advice, the weather sucked and there didn’t seem to be a lot of road kill lying about, but all that would change soon. Things were looking up. If we had to, there was a State park up the road a piece and we could go up there and poach one. Then the dreaded “I forbid you to leave” escaped his lips. Anyone who knows me would realize the futility of that. Ever sarcastic, I asked if I needed to run my departure by him.

This was starting to feel like the Hotel California and I was getting the creeps. After arguing for what seemed like an hour, I informed Roger that I didn’t need to run it by him to get permission to leave. That was my first and last trip to visit them. I found out several years later that Barb got tired of running it by Roger too  and took the kids and left. Since the kids are well over twenty one by now, I strongly suspect they are not required to run it by dad to do anything now either.  Last I heard, John and the squirrels were the last ones checking in with Roger on a regular basis.

While it’s terribly humorous in retrospect, it was painful for me to see all the adults who had gradually become pawns in his game. I got past the clock incident quickly but the longer I stayed, the longer the list of what could or couldn’t be done without running it by Roger grew. At the end it was as I mentioned- you can check out any time you like but you can never leave. Roger also knew I packed heat so he was careful not to get between me and the door.

I don’t talk with Roger anymore. One of my best hunting friends passed suddenly in 1996 from congestive heart failure. He didn’t even bother to tell me even though he came over for the funeral. I found out 6 months later in September when I discovered the phone had been disconnected. I called Roger thinking he might have a clue as to the meaning.  His rejoinder? “Oh yeah, Willie.  Bummer, huh? I guess I should have called or something.” What was always left unanswered was whether he ever ran that one by himself.

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Poll: How many Vets know what OSC is?

In this poll, I would like to know if Vets know what the OSC is? Please don’t peek and use Google.

Posted in polls, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

BRAIN FOG AND HCV

Here’s a great write up on what’s wrong with us. Read and heed. I love Liver Support News and as long as I keep buying Ultrathistle from Natural Wellness, I’ll probably keep finding this in the email. I notice the author, Nicole Cutler, is a “L.Ac.” I wonder if that short, medicalese for Licensed Acupuncturist. It could be. Or Liver Accountant or…

Posted in HCV Health, Medical News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE BATTLE OF ATHENS, TENN.–1946

Sent in by member Bob. Something I certainly didn’t know. I’m sure everyone in Tennessee is aware of it, but I wasn’t and I only lived a whoop and a holler over the Appalachians in Virginia for most of my life. A good watch at 4 minutes. Makes you proud to fight the good fight for Veterans rights considering the sorry state they’re in right now. Check it out.

Posted in All about Veterans, Food for the soul | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

THANK YOU vA

On behalf of myself and the crew here at ASKNOD (Cupcake, Joe Average Vet,horse, goat, feral kitty and two dogs), I wish to thank the vA for the new computer and peripherals which were installed by their IT technician. Everything seems to be up and running. Dragon speak will require more work as I’m just learning it. The monitor is so big I feel like I’m in the theater sitting in the front row. High def is unbelievable. Moving everything over from the old c-box is the next chore. The idea of the vA giving me the tools to wreak more havoc on the VBA via our membership is still a hard concept to grasp. Do they know the juggernaut they have created?

Posted in Independent Living Program, VR&E | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Can we trust the VA?

Many Vets have mixed feelings whether to trust the VA or not while others have a strong opinion one way or the other.    On one hand, Veterans who have weaved through the disability maze at the VA receive their compensation checks  with amazing reliability on or about the first of each month.   Still, how trustworthy is the VA?   It is one of the “core values” at least at the Palo Alto VA, according to this report.

But how is the VA doing at fulfilling this “core value”  of trustworthiness?  And, have Veterans been harmed by this lack of trust?   In at least some areas, the VA has a poor track record of trust.

One example of this is a few Veteran’s advocates suggesting the use of “certified mail return receipt requested” when dealing with the VA.   Why would this happen if the VA were trusted to not lose Veteran evidence?  In at least  some cases, the VA was caught deliberately destroying this evidence .

Further, how does the VA respond when one of its own breaches Veterans trust?  For example the VA promised to “hold accountable” those persons who shredded Veterans evidence.

But, did they really hold bad employees accountable or was this just “lip service”?    This article suggests the later.     And this is not the only instance where a “big shot” in trouble with a scandal at the VA was “moved” instead of being fired.   In this article, Congressmen Turner was quoted as “outraged” that the director of the VAMC in Dayton was promoted instead of being fired after allowing a dentist to continue working at the VAMC when  the (former director) knew for years this dentist used unsanitary procedures working with Veterans.   The article continues, suggesting at least 9 Veterans contacted Hep B and C through this dentists poor hygene practices.   Sadly, these Veterans were harmed by trusting that the VA would properly follow basic good hygiene techniques when they did not, in some instances.

It is clear that the above referenced articles seriously question not only the trustworthiness of the VA, but also in their ability to deal with the problem.

Walcoff admits to 200 “work at home” VA employees

It would seem as tho the VA does indeed trust its employees.  Michael Wolcoff, a top level VA executive, testified to congress that about 200 rating specialists rate Veterans cases at home.   Further, Congressman Hall suggested the VA “incentivize” their employees for coming to work.  Mr. Walcoff weakly denied the “incentivize” term, but admittted the VA was out of space and the work at home program “had value”.

After giving due consideration to the millions of Veterans treated at VA hospitals successfully each year, I would have to say that the VA needs improvement to win back Veterans trust in certain areas such as shredding Veterans evidence, but that they have some very good employees and doctors who do a good job treating Veterans maladies.  Its the exceptions that everyone notices and, out of fairness, we need to recognize that most Veterans do get good treatment at the VA.   In short, the VA needs improvement in many areas in the “trust” department.    Most importantly, when there is a breach of trust by a VA employee, the VA really should hold the individual accountable.  Lip service does not cut it.

Posted in Complaints Department, Guest authors, vA news | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

BVA–WINNING WITH A PROBATIVE NEXUS

FROM THE LAST LIVE FREE OR

DIE STATE  IN THE UNION RO

(MANCHESTER, NH)

What constitutes a probative nexus? How can you tell if you have the real McCoy from Dr. Bash and/or one of  his cohorts in the biz? If you are getting one from your physician, what will be the focal point in the make or break decision on whether its more probative than vA’s slanted one?

Here’s a decision handed down just last October (2011) that clearly defines what the VLj’s criteria are in his own words (or his munchkins’).  VLJ Stephen D. Reiss is a newbie and wants to get this anally correct. A lot of VLJs are altruistic that way until they burn out on screwing Vets.

The agenda is preordained. The denial is crafted to fit the individual. As we know from numerous decisions, STDs are always the culprit after service but rarely during. The same applies to getting blood on you while carrying what’s left of your buddy to the dustoff after a run in with a B 40.  On the other hand of course, a minute speck of blood, perchance from sharing a straw while enjoying Peru’s major export,  will be the most obvious etiology of the HCV- whether in service or after . In short, anything that could be a risk in service… isn’t. Conversely anything after service like excessive ETOH  use is the smoking gun. Surely you can see that. So, what are the rules for the magic paper?

This decision  elaborates in VLJ Reiss’ own (or paraphrased) words what he and other judges would accept based on established law. This case sums up all those individual nuances that will make you or break you.

The Board is charged with the duty to assess the credibility and weight given to evidence. Madden v. Gober, 125 F.3d 1477, 1481 (Fed. Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1046 (1998); Wensch v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 362, 367 (2001). Indeed, in Jefferson v. Principi, 271 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 2001), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit), citing its decision in Madden, recognized that that Board had inherent fact-finding ability. Id. at 1076; see also 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002). Moreover, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has declared that in adjudicating a claim, the Board has the responsibility to weigh and assess the evidence. Bryan v. West, 13 Vet. App. 482, 488-89 (2000); Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 614, 618 (1992).

I can find no panel or even SJD on Bryan so I haven’t the faintest where they got that cite. Here’s Wilson– Wilson_90-1080.

In any event, here’s the seminal language I was looking for a while back that summarizes what will get the pass:

As a finder of fact, when considering whether lay evidence is satisfactory, the Board may also properly consider internal inconsistency of the statements, facial plausibility, consistency with other evidence submitted on behalf of the Veteran, and the Veteran’s demeanor when testifying at a hearing. See Dalton v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 23, 38 (2007); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 511 (1995), aff’d per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

In determining the probative value to be assigned to a medical opinion, the Board must consider three factors. See Nieves-Rodriguez v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295 (2008). The initial inquiry in determining probative value is to assess whether a medical expert was fully informed of the pertinent factual premises (i.e., medical history) of the case. A review of the claims file is not required, since a medical professional can also become aware of the relevant medical history by having treated a Veteran for a long period of time or through a factually accurate medical history reported by a Veteran. See id. at 303-04.

The second inquiry involves consideration of whether the medical expert provided a fully articulated opinion. See id. A medical opinion that is equivocal in nature or expressed in speculative language does not provide the degree of certainty required for medical nexus evidence. See McLendon v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 79 (2006).

The third and final factor in determining the probative value of an opinion involves consideration of whether the opinion is supported by a reasoned analysis. The most probative value of a medical opinion comes from its reasoning. Therefore, a medical opinion containing only data and conclusions is not entitled to any weight. In fact, a review of the claims file does not substitute for a lack of a reasoned analysis. See Nieves-Rodriguez, 22 Vet. App. at 304; see also Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 120, 124 (2007) ( “[A] medical opinion … must support its conclusion with an analysis that the Board can consider and weigh against contrary opinions.”).

As you can see, you have a three-step process to make the magic paper viable. Of course, you could have all these at the RO and still come up short. The reason being is that  the M-21 A1 is missing the chapter containing Madden, Wensch, Jefferson, Wilson, Dalton Caluza, Nieves-Rodriguez , McLendon and Stefl. They live in another adjudication world when up is in and down is wrong. Legal concepts do not enter into the M-21-just denial language and chaos theory.

All in all, this is an interesting decision if for no other reason that it shows the correlation between PTSD and service connection for HCV due to drug/alcohol drug abuse. I don’t have a problem with that. Any port in a storm.

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, Nexus Information, PTSD, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

IT ONLY RAINS ON TUESDAYS AND SATURDAYS IN MAUI

On my second vacation to Hawaii in 1993, we went to Maui in June. The wind blows a lot there and really messes with your golf game. I hate that when that happens.

We stayed at the beautiful Kaanapali Alii condos on the beach. Because Buckwheat jr. was only 4 or 5, Cupcake was worried he might do a header off one of the balconies on the upper floors. Therefore we had to pay about twice as much for a ground floor condo. This definitely has its advantages.  Apparently its a  a gecko-rich environment for  little boys.  The downside was that Princess and her friend we brought along  were the subject of much attention by all the young men in the condo who arrived at the sliding glass door and walked in unannounced. We made rule changes the second day.

We met the defensive coordinator (retired) for the San Francisco 49ers and his wife one night at the outdoor barbecues. They were very pleasant and had the condo 3 floors above us. He also was sporting one of those huge Superbowl rings with a diamond about the size of a robin’s egg. Men don’t notice those things but women do.

We arrived on a Sunday from another condo we were slated to stay at. It had cockroaches and my wife wasn’t having any part of it. The Alii was far nicer and right in the middle of Hotel row-and about three times more expensive. It had the added benefit of being a stone’s throw from all the good restaurants so we didn’t have to drive drunk with the kids in tow. We could walk drunk. That’s a piece of cake.

Early Tuesday morning I heard the patter of rain on the bushes outside and prayed it would be nice by morning. For this kind of money, I theorized the least the weather could do was be amenable. As luck would have it Tuesday turned out to be  glorious.  As was Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.

Early Saturday I heard the telltale patter of rain again and Cupcake was absolutely crestfallen that we’d hit right in the middle of monsoon season. This didn’t compute with me because monsoon in Vietnam was August to January. Nevertheless, luck was on our side once again. Saturday day was blue skies and little clouds scudding across the heavens. That evening I remarked to Bill and Dottie that we sure were having good luck on the weather notwithstanding the two episodes of rain. They both looked at each other and then me and remarked that they hadn’t seen any but that maybe they slept through it.

All was well until the next Tuesday early. What were the odds of it raining again? Pretty good, apparently. At the barbecue that evening I remarked that we’d bested the rain Gods  again to looks of incredulity. I’m sure Bill must have thought I’d gone off the deep end at that stage. Come the last Saturday before departure, I heard the magic sound once again and felt compelled to go out and prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that what I was hearing was really happening. It was. It’s just that the sound I was hearing was from the sprinkler systems in the gardens. Duh. Fooled me. And as Roseanne Roseannadana used to say “It always goes to show its something”.

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

VA’s newest “homeless solution”: Smart Phone application?

A few days ago, I pointed out that instead of paying out about 400 million in bonuses, the VA could instead award about 74,400 homeless Vets each a 40% disability rating.  Instead of paying homeless Vets, they propose to give them an “app” on their smart phone!   I did not make this up!

I know it sounds crazy that the VA would add a smartphone app for homeless Vets, but its right on the VA  Vantage point website   Yes, this is NUTS!

Did anyone suggest that maybe homeless Vets can not afford, nor do they have the skills to use a smart phone?  The VA countered that people helping Vets have smart phones.  Sure we do.  We also have computers and the internet, but even with those we could not help about 75,000 Veterans from becoming homeless each nite.  What is a smart phone app going to do that a high speed internet connection cant do?

Dont get me wrong… I’m a nerd and believe that technology can help solve the backlog/homeless Vet problem.  I use the term “backlog/homeless” problem because I view them as nearly the same.   If the VA could solve the backlog problem, it would go a long way in solving the homeless problem.  The problem is the VA does not “get” the close relationship with the million man backlog and 75,000 homeless Vets.   Until they “get” this, homelessness will continue.  There are few, if any “homeless” Vets who work for the VA.  Why?  Well because VA pays its employees in two weeks, but Vets must wait for sometimes years to get their just compensation.   Many people simply cant wait for years without an income and “hang on to their home”.    If the VA paid its Veterans in 2 weeks and made their employees wait for 2 years on their paychecks, then we would see homeless VA employees!   I would like to see VA executives get paid LAST..after every Veteran was paid.  Now that would reduce homelessness!

More importantly is the “culture of denial” at the VA.  Here is a good example of a commenter ROX who alleged he was a “government employee“:

Wow, it seems no matter what the VA does for us vets (I am a vet also), some vets are still so unbelieveably ungratiful! (sic)What can that government do that would make u ungrateful vets happy and shut up and say thank you for anything they do for you (and me). I have never seen more whinney(sic) ungrateful people (men) in my life!

I am vet and service connected and I work for the government. And I am still grateful for everything the VA has done for me, everything!  end of commentor Rox quote.

I take personally his attack on Veterans.  I think the ungrateful ones are government employees earning fat bonuses while 75,000 Veterans are homeless every night.  Notice “Rox” has a government job and can’t spell ungrateful.   I wonder “who he knew” to get his job.

Posted in All about Veterans, Guest authors, HOMELESS VETERANS, VA BACKLOG, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VHA–GIT ‘ER DONE

File this one under “We’re paddlin’ as fast as we can!” Member Randy sends us this from his sleuthing everywhere. Sometimes PR flacks tend to be too exuberant and overstate what they were given to disseminate to the mainstream media grazers. Or, on the other hand, sometimes they tip their hand too far and you see the cards. The last paragraph is usually where the meat is.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 11, 2012          

 

VA Announces Aggressive National Recruitment Effort to Hire Mental Health Professionals

WASHINGTON (June 11, 2012)- Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki recently announced the department would add approximately 1,600 mental health clinicians as well as nearly 300 support staff to its existing workforce to help meet the increased demand for mental health services.  The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed an aggressive national recruitment program to implement the hiring process quickly and efficiently.

“The mental health and well-being of our brave men and women who have served the Nation is the highest priority for this department,” said Secretary Shinseki.  “We must ensure that all Veterans seeking mental health care have access to timely, responsive and high-quality care.”

VA has developed an aggressive national mental health hiring initiative to improve recruitment and hiring, marketing, education and training programs, and retention efforts for mental health professionals, to include targeted recruitment in rural and highly-rural markets. This will help VA to meet existing and future demands of mental health care services in an integrated collaborative team environment and continue to position VA as an exemplary workplace for mental health care professionals.

It is critical for VA to proactively engage psychiatrists and other mental health care providers about the vital mission to deliver high-quality mental health services, especially for returning combat Veterans.

“The VA mental health community is aggressively transforming the way mental health care services are provided to the Veteran population. As the mental health care workforce continues to increase, VA is committed to improving Veterans’ access to services, especially for at-risk Veterans,” said VA’s Under Secretary for Health Dr. Robert Petzel.

The national recruitment program provides VHA with an in-house team of highly skilled professional recruiters employing private sector best practices to fill the agency’s most mission critical clinical and executive positions.  The recruitment team consists of 21 national, dedicated health care recruiters targeting physician and specialty health care occupations. These recruiters also understand the needs of Veterans because each member is a Veteran.

VHA has also established a hiring and tracking task force to provide oversight for this initiative to move the process forward expeditiously in a focused manner to ensure challenges, issues, or concerns are addressed and resolved.  This task force is accountable for reporting progress in hiring of mental health professionals in these occupations: psychiatrists, psychologists, mental health nurses, social workers, mental health technicians, marriage and family therapists and licensed professional counselors.

VHA anticipates the majority of hires will be selected within approximately six months and the most “hard-to-fill” positions filled by the end of the second quarter of FY 2013. VA has an existing workforce of 20,590 mental health staff that includes nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers.

Not wishing to be the nattering nabob of negativity and spoil Gen. Shinseki’s parade, but…

>If “the majority of the new hires will be selected in approximately six months” is vAspeak for their normal delays, shouldn’t we translate that more vaguely into  “Coming to you sometime  in this lifetime?”

> If, indeed, all these new hires manage to be selected, does “selected” mean they will have to be trained by existing personnel, and, if so, when does vA anticipate them coming on line?

> What does vA intend to do, during this hiring spree, with the fact that numerous, recently separated, unemployed Veterans seem to be  developing obsessive/compulsive disorders and chewing on the ends of firearms-thus expiring from lead poisoning?

>At the current, published rate of 1 veteran every 80 minutes taking his own life,  is the vA aware  that there will be approximately 108 veteran deaths by suicide in the interim while these new mental health personnel are “selected” in the next six months (let alone commissioned to act)?

> Has the vA anticipated what the delay of implementing this may have on the Homeless Veteran population, many of whom have mental disorders, too?

> Re the “hard positions” being filled by June of 2013, a year hence, could the vA be more precise as to how many personnel fall into the “hard positions” classification versus “soft” ones?

>Could the VHA describe the the job title and duties of “soft” positions and the approximate pay scale range of same? “Hard” positions?

These might have been the hard questions asked had this been issued live at a podium by Ms. Hickey at 810 Vermont yesterday.  Fortunately, being a press release from VASEC “recently”, it has no provenance, no immediate author to scapegoat and thus escapes scrutiny for content. This is in keeping with their new “non confrontational” posture-a win/win for vA and Vets.

Well, I know I’ll breathe easier and sleep soundly tonight knowing vA at least has a plan! Perhaps vA should ask the homeless Vet on the street what his take is on all this?

Posted in Gulf War Issues, HOMELESS VETERANS, Medical News, PTSD, VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments