Here’s one of those brilliant medical A=C, B=C therefore A≠D. Huh? You can follow the tortured logic of a Hepatitis Australian Antigens Test in 1973 being positive. Simple. He had HBV in service documented by being HAA positive. He claims the doc told him it was HCV. Impossible because it hadn’t been invented yet. His sister remembers him calling her up in 1973 and telling her it was HCV. Ditto. Credibility is now shot. You can hear the toilet flush.
Then, wonder of wonders, the VA examiner decides what he had in service is undoubtedly HAV. One major problem is the PCR testing shows HBV but no HAV. It doesn’t even seem to faze them in the least. Quick! somebody call the DAV in Littlerock and tell them they’ve been hornswoggled. What gives here? I see he failed to get a nexus but that’s his SO’s fault. Their job is to prepare this to win, not play pocket pool and let it go on for six years and then to the BVA without one.
The crime is no one can follow the HBV card in this three-card Monte game. Are SOs really that dense in Little Rock? A crime was committed with a gun and everyone is running around looking for the knife. Idiot’s delight. I don’t blame the VA on this one. They’re dumb and we know that. Hasn’t the DAV learned anything about Caluza in 19 years?
It’s March 21st as I write this. He has two days to get his NOA into the Court. I guess when he finally gets an education on it he can file CUE. Lose the sister, though. She’s no help.




Maybe the sister thinks that Hep B turns into C.
When you get hepatitis A, it lasts a few weeks and goes away by itself and you develop immunity to it. So his Hep A test will show he’s immune if he’s ever had hepatitis A. If he has no immunity then that means he’s never had hepatitis A. If it was me I would have a hepatitis panel. It would tell him whether he has Hep B and it’s active or he’s a carrier and whether he’s ever had hep A.
Good thoughts Sylvia and might I add to get an independent lab run the study rather than VA lab.