Lars S.

Lars S. was the quintessential Veteran of the Vietnam war conflict. He was a distinguished member of the long grey line. That’s a euphemism for a West Point graduate. He was in it for the long term as a profession. He was born at the right time (in his mind) to take advantage of the brewing conflict in SEA. He trained in Aviation and got his rating in rotary wing aircraft in 1966. Let me explain that. There are fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft. We in the Air Force looked at F-4s as normal fixed wing flying devices. Congress decided to let the Army partake of this in a slightly different mode. They let the groundpounders have choppers. Hueys and their cousins do not have wings. The rotor blades are the wing and double as the propulsion device. This is insane and very dangerous as we all know when they get shot up. The Army sees it differently.

Lars was an accomplished chopper pilot and for a year he flew a Huey gunship in I Corps. He came home as a lot of us did with a different perspective on how we treat our fellow man. In a word, he was traumatized. In 1982 the military invented the term PTSD to replace “battle fatigue”. Lars was one of the first recipients. He had also had a mishap when someone shot out his tail rotor with a B-40 near Monkey Mountain. When that happens the correct procedure is to allow the collective to float to neutral, fall out of the sky and just before splatting, engage the collective to slow the descent. This is called autorotation and feels like being in an elevator coming down from the 60th floor at 140 knots. You usually bend the skids when you land if you do it correctly. Lars did it by the book and walked away from it with his door gunners and copilot in one piece. The Huey was totaled.

Fast forward to the nineties.  I met Lars in 1990 via the real estate and construction industry. His wife sold houses for us. Lars had problems with his back due to the Huey incident. He was a tough guy but the injury got progressively worse. VA wouldn’t give him SC for it as he didn’t claim it for another 20 years.  Worse, he didn’t appeal. He did get an increase to 50% for his PTSD issues over the years but the SC for the back injury eluded him. He would file again, lose and walk away. He did this no less than 4 times with no success. When DM2 became presumptive, he got 20% for that and finally reached 60%. He never filed for TDIU because he didn’t have the magic 70%.

When I began my new fight for Hep./PCT in 07, Lars and I regularly got together on Wednesdays for lunch to discuss how to win at this crazy game. In 08 he came down with prostate issues and later, pancreatic cancer. I planned to help him attain SC for these as well as his back problem. Before we could formulate a plan his health declined. He passed in 09 while I was in the Seattle VAMC letting the VA’s Doogie Howsers play with my insides. He never got P&T and his wife ended up with burial benefits and no DIC.

This was so avoidable- so unnecessary-in a word, tragic. He had all the ingredients to win but never marshaled his assets for a concerted attack. He used cardboard box filing cabinets from the liquor store- the kind with 12 cubbyholes. Every time he moved they got misplaced. Trying to assemble his claim was like one of those 20 year old 2,000 piece jigsaw puzzles that are in the kid’s closet.  I worked with him for almost a year before I went in for surgery in 4/09. My stay changed from the Gilligan Island three hour tour to a year and four surgeries. Lars was gone and there was nothing for it.

Which brings us to the point of all this. Lars was of the opinion that he could simply amass a number of 10%s and 20%s and finally get to the magic 100 and Nirvana. He was unaware of how VA adds up your disabilities. He had used numerous VSOs over the years in pursuit of all this and not one told him how it works. He was very opinionated and wouldn’t listen to me as I was a newbie. I learned by reading 38 CFR from cover to cover.  The long and the short of this is that you can’t get there from here. VA designed it that way. Platitudes aside, you will never get to 100% absent a 100% rating in one venue. You can get close, like 90% but you won’t get to 100% scheduler absent the physical rating. Notice the big leap on all ratings charts from 60-70% up to 100. I suppose you can, but allow me to illustrate what it would take.

When Lars passed he was rated 60%. This consisted of 50% for his PTSD, 20% for the DM2 and 10% for the tinnitus. He was in the pipeline for a rating on the prostate issue when he passed. His wife never pursued it and I was far too ill to volunteer by then.  According to the 38 CFR §4.25 ratings table, 50% + 20%= 60%. 60% + 10% =64%. 64% rounds down like the IRS leaving 60%.  See table below.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/4/25

Now, scroll down a little to 64 and digest this morsel.  Move sideways until you see the 96 on the far right which will round up to 100%. Now backtrack to the top and notice the 90 above that column. You will need a 90% rating on top of your 60% to attain your 100% scheduler. Even had Lars managed to survive his battle with the prosate/pancreas issues, he might only have attained a separate rating as high as 60%, still leaving him in limbo. Granted, he could have legitimately attained TDIU at that point and sadly, had he pursued the matter, he could have attained it much earlier in 2002 when he got the DM2 rating, assuming a concerted push to attain 70% for the PTSD.

TDIU is not quite the panacea that VA and VSOs tout it to be. It is a temporary rating always subject to revision downwards based on annual reexaminations. TDIU will get you one of those neat military DEERS cards that allow you to shop at the PX or commissary. What it will not get you is entitlement to the benefits associated with Chapter 35. One of these benefits is DIC for your spouse after you pass. This is also the program that will pay for your children’s college, as well as your wife’s, should she elect to do so. Many states have a program that gives free tuition to the children of Vets rated Permanent and Total. In most states this extends to wives as well. This is the meat of your rating.  69¢ a pound chicken is all well and fine, but a $48,000 college education buttressed by $965 a month from the VA per dependent for 4 years is reason to sit up and take notice. DIC currently runs about $1250/mo. Do the math.

VA is also not munificent in handing out P&T. Look at these figures. There are currently 27 million Veterans, 8 million of whom are service connected from 0 to 100%. Of the 8 million 357,000, give or take a couple of thousand are actually P&T. Where do you want to be? Even if and when you attain that 100% scheduler, you still have to wait two years minimum for another gander under the hood to make sure you’re still as ill as you were when they gave you the 100%. I can show you how to beat that, but not here today.

The moral of the story is perseverance. Half-hearted attempts will gain you nothing. VA counts on this. PTSD-addled Vets have an unfortunate proclivity for failing to follow through and complete things. Lars was one semester away from his law degree and never attained it. One final reason not to dissemble is you must be P&T for 10 years in order for the spouse to get DIC. This is all the more true for PTSD Vets. If you die of hepatocellular carcinoma due to your SC hep. in less than 10 years , the spouse still gets it because it’s SC. Very few Vets actually die from PTSD unless you count the ones who commit suicide. VA doesn’t remunerate you or your spouse for that. So many rules. So little time.

P.S. Sorry for any confusion. I had to repost to remove wrong tags.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

VA Budget for Homeless Vets

Everyone who knows me is aware of my propensity to digest numbers and discover aberrant results. I saw this on Veterans today as a tweet.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/05/secretary-shinseki-announces-an-additional-10-3-million-to-help-eliminate-veterans-homelessness/

Extrapolating by adding 59.5 Million dollars to the new authorization of 10. 3 Million dollars yields 69.8 Million.

I searched to find how many Vets are homeless on any one given night and came up with this:

http://www.nchv.org/background.cfm

They quote 107,000 currently with half from the Vietnam conflict. Dividing 69.8 million by 107,000, I arrived at the magic sum of $65,234.00 being expended on each homeless Vet.

To show you how out of touch the VA is with its own finances, consider this. An unmarried Veteran standing alone on 100% disability gets $2673.00/month. Multiply that by 12 months and voila!-$32,076.00 per year. Subtracting 65,234.00 from this figure leaves us a savings of $33,158.00 per Vet. Moving right along in mathematics world, let’s multiply that by the same aforementioned 107,000 Vets. I “construe”this to yield a savings of $35,479,060.00 if we simply give these poor souls a 100% disability rating regardless of whether they are qualified recipients or not. A homeless Vet would probably be able to escape the shackles of his zip code absent horrific mental illness.  Without denigrating the esteemed VASEC, it  seems there’s something amiss with this plan.

Murphy’s  sixteenth law expounded on this when he observed that monies expended in pursuit of remedying a social inequity-don’t. Spending even more to right the unintended laws of consequences further squanders the VA’s precious financial resources. Sometimes the bean counters get lost in all those zeros.

Posted in General Messages | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

BVA– Bipolar +IVDU= HCV SC

I keep hearing about these and finally found one. This is a 2011 decision and shows the misogynist reasoning need to arrive at this. I have heard of this with PTSD but not  the Bipolar route. Check out the “at least as likely as not” train of conjecture. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not dissing the Vet, just commenting on creative reasoning.  It takes me back to Michael Keaton in Mr. Mom when he opined about his remodel-“220-221 (volts). Whatever it takes”.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files2/1111288.txt

This is rich:

In light of the above, the Board finds that the Veteran's hepatitis 
C is at least as likely as not due to his IV drug use, but that his
 IV drug use is at least as likely as not due to his 
service-connected bipolar disorder.  Accordingly, the Board 
concludes that that Veteran's hepatitis C is at least as likely as 
not causally or etiologically related to his service-connected 
bipolar disorder.  Service connection for hepatitis C is granted.
Posted in BvA HCV decisions | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Post Office Form 3817

While sending in my Notice of Disagreement with The Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment chuckleheads today, I was chatting with the Post Office Mistress, or is that postmasterperson  shoot, postmistressperson,    masterpostperson, (this politically correct thing is hard to get the hang of) about having to send mail to the VA via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested (CM3R) and how that set me back several good bottles of single malt scotch over the years. She asked me why I was doing this and I told her about the Presumption of Regularity and the Common Law Mailbox Rule(CLMR). Her eyebrows went up because she’s over, well, she’s over 40, okay? Not being a spring chicken and knowledgeable about all things postal, she was dumbfounded to say the least as I explained that Veterans are lower than whaleshit in the ocean and lie a lot. Therefore, as their credibility is always in question, they must prove that they mailed something. Whereas the VA, who is honest and above board, shits ice cream, and walks on water need prove nothing when they mail a letter to us.

I’m not one of those idiot men who never ask for instructions. I’m the opposite. I told her I have this site and it costs a lot of Veterans a pretty penny to send all this in with a green card when they’re indigent. So I opined as it was a shame that the USPS didn’t have anything that would work in its stead. When what should my wondering eyes behold? The PostHeadwoman waving a Certificate of Mailing under my nose.

PO Form 3817 is a date and time stamped certificate that certifies-probably under penalty of death- that the article being mailed is from , You, Joe Vet and is being sent specifically to the VARO in (add your city here), the BVA in D.C. or to the CAVC in the same burg.  She then gleefully went on to explain that the CLMR cuts both ways.  Once the article is in her possession, all the VA’s rules apply to them as well. And here’s the clincher.

How much would you expect to pay for this USPS service? A flat $5.00? $3.50? No siree, kemosabe. Just think. It’s 2011, they’re bankrupt and a dollar fifteen will put you in the driver’s seat. She explained that it was rather antiquated and very rarely used, if ever. She’s only used one 3 or four times in the last decade. I analyzed this for a minute or so and I think it holds water. What’s sauce for the goose, gentlemen. Regardless, it would make a lovely 3 judge panel at the CAVC and you can get you name emblazoned in lights like Rafael Rios did forever…  NOD v. Shinseki (2019). Dude, I’m sending everything this way in the future. I can’t drink fine scotch anymore, but I can sure serve it to my friends now. Thank you Madame Kathleen. I’m glad they change her title. Mentioning you saw your Postmistress today won’t sound very innocuous to the wife-san.

Check out my post on Rios v. Mansfield in the CAVC category to get the grasp on how the CLMR works. Also look at the way the BVA treats us poor greedy Vets when we ask for benefits under a statute Congress wrote specifically for those of us who are damaged beyond repair (BVA decisions attached below).

P.S. The NOD was for their denial of my request for them to buy me a MAC notebook and some software.  They’ll spend $18K on retraining a”educationally challenged” Vet who never learned how to read, but won’t cough up $1200 so I can print this? Outrageous! They also turned me down for the greenhouse and the sewing machine, but I padded the request to give myself some bargaining room. I’m available for a beer summit. I’m certainly not trying to be unreasonable here.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files1/1109753.txt  (metal detector)

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files3/1124514.txt  (tractor, lawn mower, snowblower)

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/Files6/1046460.txt  (art and photo supplies)

And the Certificate of Mailing- too cool for school. Click on it and it gets bigger if you are blind like me.

Posted in Tips and Tricks | 2 Comments

BVA– Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory

Every once in a while you run across a decision that compels you to read all the way through just to find out why (absent the perennial drug accusations) a Veteran loses something that ultimately is winnable. We here at AskNod have tried to point to all the common and the occasional uncommon reasons why you can lose at this. It amazes me that some Vets have an uncanny ability to keep talking in order to fill in those pregnant pauses medical personnel are so adept at providing. Here it becomes fatal to the claim. There obviously is some grasping at straws as the gentleman slowly realizes he’s going to need more ammo. The claim becomes toxic in spite of the AmLeg’s best efforts (or because of them).

Vets would be advised to take away an important lesson from this. VA has all the records and examines them to determine that your version of events comports with their evidence. If nothing is in sync, they go farther afield and analyze it to death. Here, in desperation, the Vet continues to embellish his lies to somehow buttress his cow feces.

Truth will never get you in trouble. Here, the truth is that the Veteran had no claim(s) that were verifiable and the Vet was well aware of it. He tried to bluff his way through and then, in desperation, started manufacturing evidence simply by  vebalizing it. Being equivocal in a claim is fatal. If you were shot or tagged with a SFW in combat, you would remember every second like it was in slow motion. You would know if you had a transfusion- or didn’t. Va examiners do this for a living, so don’t think you can beard the lion in his own den.

Why this Vet’s SO allowed this to get in is incomprehensible. Once discovered, some form of rebuttal or recusal was in order. Charge or retreat? He chose to charge:

Moreover, the Veteran’s statements as to his history of blood transfusions

are, at best,  inconsistent.  After initially

stating that he did receive a transfusion in connection with
an auto accident, he denied that he had a transfusion, then
stated that he a transfusion; all statements made within a
five-month period.  Specifically, he indicated to a VA
clinician in July 2006 that he did have a transfusion in
1990; he denied any history of blood transfusions to the
September 2006 VA clinician; and he stated in his November
2006 hepatitis C questionnaire that he possibly had a
transfusion.  The Veteran's statements, by themselves,
are not credible evidence that a blood transfusion occurred
in conjunction with his September 1990 accident.  Nor are
they supported by any evidence of record.  See Washington v.
Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368  (2005).   

Sharing razors in service is an event which the Veteran is
competent to describe.  See Barr v Nicholson, 21 Vet. App.
303 (2007); Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 398, 405 (1995). 
However, competency must be distinguished from weight and
credibility, which are factual determinations, going to
the probative value of the evidence, for the adjudicator. 
Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997).  Not only has
the Veteran provided inconsistent testimony with respect
to having received a blood transfusion during service, but
he has equivocated on whether he did, in fact, share razors.  
Specifically, he indicated to a VA clinician in 
September 2006 that he may have shared razors with other people, and
he stated in the November 2006 risk factor questionnaire
that he possibly shared razors.  While not a model of
clarity, the Veteran's January 2007 correspondence states
that he received haircuts from foreign nationals, during
which he was nicked on the neck by a razor, and that he
occasionally used razors that were not clean or new. 
Because the Veteran has never made a clear statement that
he did, in fact, share razors, and because, in his last
statement he has, for the first time, indicated he was
nicked by a razor during a haircut, the Board seriously
questions the credibility of the Veteran's statements
regarding razors.  Finally, while the Veteran's report of
jaundice during service is capable of lay observation, it
is contradicted by his assertion in the July 1993 medical
history report that he did not have a history of jaundice. 
The Veteran's assertions are lacking in credibility, and are
of no probative value.

If no one believes a word that comes out of your mouth, you will have a hard time convincing others of what time it is. If you’re going to lie, recite it for a few months or years to make it hold water. Write it down and keep it handy in your wallet if you have brain fog. I, for one, don’t advise it. If VA grants you benefits under false pretenses and then discovers the truth, you will owe a lot of money back and get that unanticipated staycation with free food at the government’s boarding house in Leavenworth, Kansas.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files2/1112274.txt

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, Frivolous Filings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

VA Theory of Odds of Getting Hep.

VA has assigned a brand new sliding scale of the odds of getting Hepatitis C and what each ratio is. I had no idea they went into such detailed scientific research to obtain this.  This is utterly mind-boggling.

>Intravenous drug use (odds ratio of 49.6)

>Blood transfusion (10.9)

>Sex with an intravenous drug user (6.3)

>Having been in jail more than three days (2.9)

>Religious scarification (2.8)

>Tattooing (2.12)

>Having been struck or cut by a bloody object (2.1)

>Pierced ears or body parts (2.0)

>Average incidence of seroconversion to HCV (hepatitis C virus) 
after unintentional needle sticks or sharp exposures from an 
HCV-positive source (1.8)

>Immunoglobulin injection (1.6)

Does anyone notice the dichotomy here?  Despite numerous grants of SC with accompanying nexus letters proving the “plausibility”, we can’t even get them to do any comprehensive study on the risk of obtaining it from jetguns. In fact, as one can see above, the odds of this occurring are unknown because VA hasn’t bothered to find out. It’s akin to a gaping black hole next door to Jupiter and not one scientist even remotely interested in examining it to find out the implications for mankind.

Something else is missing from this study and I do not think it is a coincidence either. There is no mention of the risk ratio associated with mass consumption of adult beverages. In fact, where’s the study on the risk of smoking left-handed tobacco and contraction of HCV? VA regularly tars and feathers claimants who admit as much.  Now we see there was no risk- at least on April 7th, 2011.

These findings were divulged in a Board decision attached below. They are not old data, but the latest, cutting edge revelations of a doctor trained in the art of odds.  Its funny how they can be so detailed as to the odds of “Religious Scarification” which I wasn’t even aware was a risk. What about regular, atheistic scarification? In fact, nowhere is alien abduction with resultant percutaneous piercing quantified. No, I’m sorry. This medical finding is lacking numerous untold and unmentioned risks. If you and I presented this as evidence, it would be discounted as not being probative and inherently incredible. This study raises more questions than it answers, I’m afraid.

 

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files2/1112433.txt

Need I mention the Vet lost? No. I suppose not. That would be horribly redundant.

P.S. I just realized why they didn’t discuss the ramifications of alcohol. This emanated from the Louisville, Kentucky VARO. I believe that’s a dry county. No booze ergo no risk.


							
Posted in General Messages | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

To Afghan Vets–CYA

In July of 1970, three months after I arrived in SEA, somebody figured out I spoke French. As we were busy ignoring the border between RVN and Cambodia, they needed interpreters to communicate with the Cambodian AF pilots to direct ground strikes. My  orders were cut after I “volunteered” to proceed to Bien Hoa Airpatch,  Right before I deployed, they called me in and I was asked a different question. How would I like to volunteer for something that basically entailed the same job (AFSC 203X0) but slightly different. My first question was “Where?”

The Captain at 7th AF Hq Tactical Air Combat Control (TACC) said “Can’t tell you”.

Me: “What does it involve?”

Capt. “Can’t tell you.”

Me: “Is it dangerous?”

Capt. : “Yep”.

Me: “Does it involve flying?”

Capt.:”Yep.”

Me: “How bad is it?”

Capt.: “The casualty rate is running 30+% but you get Flight and Hostile fire pay.”

In my testosterone-crazed, 19 year old mind, I  readily interpreted this as a guaranteed 70% chance I’d be coming out the other end in one piece. What could be more fun? I’d be meeting good looking women who spoke French in my off hours. Right? Besides, what could possibly go wrong? It was like extra sharp smoked cheese in the mousetrap. It was worse than a moth being attracted to a 30,000 watt light bulb. “Where do I sign up?”, I  asked.

30 years later when I filed my claims for hep. and PCT, I was told a) there were no medical records of my GSW and transfusion and b) I’d never been to RVN, let alone Laos. In addition, there was nothing that said I’d even had hep. in the military.

This is where the conversation turns to you who are coming home from our latest Olympics in Southwest Asia. Gentlemen (and ladies), it behooves you to keep every scrap of paper the military gives you. Most important are things like TDY orders which will never be included in your milrecs. When your health starts to decline and you’re not feeling well about 20 years from now, you will entertain the idea that maybe the VA should make good on President Lincoln’s compact with the defenders of America. That would the one that starts out “For he who shall have borne the battle…”. Having records to back up your contentions is paramount to your claim. If you keep them safe, VA cannot sadly inform you that they had a little warehouse fire  down in St. Louis and everything was lost in 2016. They cannot say there’s nothing to prove your contentions. Military records are powerful evidence to prove your case. I can’t tell you how many Navy Veterans were disenfranchised by virtue of no records of their having touched red clay in Vietnam. VA is intractable on this subject. No tickee, no laundry as they say at the dry cleaners.

Buy a cheap fireproof safe and put all your mil/medrecs in it. Save them until you’re dead and don’t need them. If you die of something you came down with over there, at least your wife can drag them out and use them to get DIC. I know that’s small consolation to both of you, but its good advice.  I kept everything and below is how I proved I was “There”.  One small scrap of paper. A snapshot of a bygone era. A niggling worry in my mind that just maybe they wouldn’t be stand up guys if the shit hit the fan.

One last bit of advice. Do not, under any circumstances, volunteer for anything when they ask you. Some will say it won’t look good in your Personnel jacket. Would you rather face the approbation of 3 at your promotion hearing board or carried by six at your funeral? Yeah, I know. Where do I sign Up?

Posted in From the footlocker, General Messages | Leave a comment

Remember DEROS?

Remember that magic moment when suddenly you only had 30 more wakeups? Think back 40 years. All of a sudden 6 actual said”Take him off Point. He’s too short.”  Recall how your buddies would bait you by asking just how short you were?

How about these?

I’m so short I have to climb up on my boots to tie them

…I had to put a rubber on my 16 ’cause I keep getting dirt in the barrel

… my pant don’t fit anymore

… I almost got stepped on 5 times yesterday

…I can’t see over the windshield on the Jeep anymore.

Well, fellow pilgrims, I looked on ebennies Friday night and there it was. My appeals are finally in front of the man for adjudication. It’s almost time for a massive infusion of $ back to 94 or shutdown corner. I’m the eternal optimist. When life deals you lemons, make lemonade. But do not stop there. Seek out the guy who got the potatoes and is making vodka with them.

When VA gets new evidence, they have to address it. Somehow they forgot to do this in 94 and my old claim is still technically open. The DRO said otherwise. That’s why I find myself in D.C. (pro se, of course.) You don’t think I’d trust this to a VSO, do you?

Posted in General Messages, Humor | Tagged | Leave a comment

PCT ratings

While waiting 16 months for VA to rate me in 08, I read extensively. I was so sick it helped pass the time. My diet consisted of BVA decisions on all the things I had filed for except tinnitus. Porphyria Cutanea Tarda is an Agent Orange disease, but also is a secondary of HCV in about 30% of infections. While waiting, I researched how VA treated this to try to ascertain how they would rate me. PCT is listed under Part 4, 4.118 -skin

http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/4/118

under DC 7815. The ratings are mighty skinny for percentages as you can only imagine. VA is not generous. However one thing I discovered was that for those of us who require phlebotomies (the opposite of a transfusion), there is a higher rating- much higher. DC 7704 concerns Polycythemia Vera and is the only code that contemplates phlebotomies. They give a whopping 40% for it compared to the 10% I got based on scars. I came home from SEA with this but no one had discovered AO and the correlation between the two yet. I found out in 92 and finally had a name for something I’d been afflicted with for 20 years.

When I approached VA with it in 94, the response was predictable-“All well and fine, Mr. Nod, but you weren’t in RVN”. Well excuse me, yes I was.  The argument devolved into the next phase- “Yes, ah, okay that’s all well and good, but you didn’t manifest it within a year of leaving SEA.” Excuse me? Is that Catch 23?

When my Hepatologist doctor finally wrote me a nexus letter that the VSO assured me I didn’t need, he was kind enough to describe the PCT as a secondary of my HCV and not due to the fifth of Johnnie Walker Black VA insisted I guzzled every day.  Thus my PCT rating was upped from 10 to 40% by the DRO review. As for an earlier effective date of 1994, I’m still working on that. It’s before Veterans Law Judge Mark D. Hindman as I write this and will soon be decided.

Dorland’s medical Dictionary has this to say about PCT:

PCT is attributable to only 4 possible medical causes:

1) extreme, prolonged alcohol abuse with resultant hyaline cirrhosis;

2) vertical transmission by genetic predisposition( dominant genes from mother and/or father) ;

3) prior infection with hepatitis viruses A,B, or non-A non-B (hepatitis C); 

4) exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin(TCDD), a byproduct of the manufacture of 2, 4-D and  2,4,5-T, in a 1:1 ratio(phenoxyl herbicides in ester),more commonly known as Agent Orange, White, Pink, Purple and Green.

I hope this helps any of you who were diagnosed with it and given short shrift by VA on it’s etiology. The truth is out there.

Posted in AO, General Messages | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tom Philpott–Military Update.

Every Saturday morning I sit down to read the newspaper and most especially, the column by Tom Philpott -Military Update. It often deals with issues pertinent to our circumstances. His article this week was very touching. It was an article about TSGT. Tom Marcum (AF) and his travails with the military medical community. He is now part of the VA medical circus. We will pray for Tom and his wife April. They have no idea what’s in store for them. While we here confine ourselves to the shortcomings of the VBA and the VHA, the difference is negligible. I recommend you start reading his column if you don’t already. Here’s the skinny:

Tom Philpott can be reached at milupdate@AOL.com or                                                               Military Update                                                                                                                             P.O. Box 231111                                                                                                                     Centreville, Va. 20120-1111

ABOUT TOM PHILPOTT

Tom Philpott has been breaking news for and about military people since 1977. After service in the Coast Guard, and 17 years as a reporter and senior editor with Army Times Publishing Company, Tom launched “Military Update,” his syndicated weekly news column, in 1994. “Military Update” features timely news and analysis on issues affecting active duty members, reservists, retirees and their families. Tom also edits a reader reaction column, “Military Forum.” The online “home” for both features is Military.com.

Tom’s freelance articles have appeared in numerous magazines including The New Yorker,Reader’s Digest and Washingtonian. His critically-acclaimed book, Glory Denied, on the extraordinary ordeal and heroism of Col. Floyd “Jim” Thompson, the longest-held prisoner of war in American history, is available in hardcover and paperback.

The dude’s hot.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments