vARO–Waiting For Mr. Goodbar

Diane privately emailed me to inform my site has been invaded by a merry prankster/hacker. All my capital Vs have been reduced to lower case whenever vA is used. Relax Diane. I did it. If vA insists on treating us as untermenchen, then we will consider them anti-Veteran and address them appropriately.

The title above concerns the Independent Living Program. I called Kris, my parole officer claims supervisor for ILP several weeks ago. He got back to me on Friday. Apparently his supervisor, the Grand Poohbah of all things VR&E in the Pacific Northwest,  has had my NOD sitting on his desk for over a fortnight or more and hasn’t even looked at it yet. Kris tells me he is a Very Busy Man and Very High Up. He feels that there will be some resolution to it soon and refused to commit on whether Mr.  Goodbar might approve or deny it. He did his special:

” Well, You know, Mr. Nod, we’re in uncharted territory here. VA is not in the habit of handing out computers. Too many Vets in the past have, you know, well, used them to view, heh, pornography and vA certainly isn’t going to facilitate that. While we feel your case is different, there’s no precedent for this that we can cite to. Independent Living is, well, independence in daily living which means you could take the bus down to the local library and use their- excuse me? no bus and library? Well, rural living has it rewards, too. Have you considered taking up birding? vA could put in a nice bird feeder and you can watch “bird TV” I hear it’s very soothing.”

I look forward to this battle. The VA has chosen to fieldstrip the ILP and remove all but cordless phones and grab bars from the remunerations program. I know you guys are looking at this and saying “Hell, thet Nod dude is trying to smoke them fellers down at the vARO.  Computer? Shoot. Rots a ruck!”

Well, think about it. This battle is for the lapidary guy who need a new rock polisher. Face it. $36,ooo.00 a year for serving your country and getting dinged up badly? Give the guy a pastime. What’s a rock polisher go for? $350.00?  This battle is for a guy with PTSD who never leaves home due to agoraphobia. Let’s say he wants some photo gear for $1000.00. So what? vA throws millions at a study to see if homeless Vets have clean socks and underwear in winter months. They give them cel phones in D.C. so they can call 911 or St. Elizibeth’s if they OD.

In short, what is a computer for spewing out this  HCV drivel worth? Helping Vets is a noble endeavour just as much as giving a 20% SC Vet an open-ended grant for $16K to finish his/her degree in acupuncture or a Poly Sci  goatskin.

A veteran that is 100% P&T qualifies for this and Congress specifically funded it and provided for it in 1982. Vets who are never going to be part of the workforce again still deserve more than lip service in 2012. The problem as they see it is simple. We are no longer productive therefore we cannot be “rehabilitated”. Better any monies spent are diverted to the potentially productive Vet. Nevertheless, they still go through the pretend motions as if this older version of ILP is viable. The dude comes out to the house and surveys it. He makes sure you can get into and out of the shower and are not in need of A&A. They search the bathrooms for ADA grab bars and take notes. They thank you profusely for applying and you never hear from them again. Finally after several months and some prodding, they send you the Dear John letter and allow as there is little they can do to make you more “independent” as it appears you already are. I mean- come on. You’re not living in a group home. Right? That’s pretty friggin’ independent in their book. This is generally followed by what I could best characterize as the Jed Clampett sendoff- “Y’all come back now, hear?”

It’s usually up to the savvy Vet to obtain a 4138 and file his own NOD. The VR&E guys don’t get into that whole claims thingie. They all have degrees and titles indicating a Human Resources background with a Rodney King minor in “Can’t we all just get along?”  This is where I find myself. Now, it could be that they are stymied because my C-file currently resides in D.C. They cannot legally shoot down my NOD without reviewing my file. That’s what those VA examiners do. That would leave it in limbo until the file comes back some time in the future. I can’t wait for electronic files. It would allow them to be viewed by multiple parties-including the guys who hack into the system.  If they can screw up the paper ones this well, you can imagine what the future holds.  Onwards through the fog. Vote for Hungry Chuck.

Posted in All about Veterans, General Messages, Independent Living Program, Tips and Tricks, vARO Decisions, VR&E | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

BvA– Grampa Goes to D.C.

I was looking through the library of BvA claims from 2011. I noticed this one and everything struck me as off about it. The Vet was recently rated in 2008 and is asking for a Fenderson of his original rating.  All well and good. but they are reluctant to grant any more than the 10% from 2010 to 2012. Instead, they grant the 10% backwards to his immense pleasure to his filing date in 2007.  No 20% forRichard Simmons here.  He’s announced that he’s smoking his peers on the golf course. Huh? Why would you sandbag your chances for a good rating by telling Dr. C&P that you’re   hitting to an 8?

The Vet has a Service Rep to put a hand over his mouth, but to no avail. This was where I got to thinking. How old is this dude? 10% for hep? How long has he had it? What’s going on? When you breeze through the beginning on these in a rush to get to the meat, you miss the beginning credits and who stars it it. This old boy was from the Civil War-almost. He probably got drafted in 1950 at 18. That would make him about 80 or so. If he’s just now getting the dirty dozen from this bug then he must have gotten it  from a recent (pre-92) transfusion or one of those Famous Amos vA colonoscopies with a surprise in it.

File this one in “Somebody stop me from talking”  under D in the Diarrhea of the Piehole file. I always ask those who seek to file to look at DC7354 and see where they fall in the code. This gives you two valuable things-what to look for and why your right upper quadrant near the rib cage hurt for the last ten years. Most importantly it discusses how many days you were incapacitated in the most-recent last twelve months. For those of you from Pomona that would be how many days did you miss from March 2012 to March 2011 if counting backwards from today. If it’s less than 7, then you need to act sicker.

I will share this baking tip with you. We all love to use sugar when we cook. If you have hep and you’re at Stage 3-4, I found out (quite by accident) that if you eat too much fatty red meat and too many sweets and desert, your AST/ALT will go up dramatically. I mean WAY up. I wouldn’t suggest doing this if you’re diabetic. It will kill you, but for all the other daring individuals, it’s a neat hepatitis hat trick. The Mary Kaye #4 black eye shadow is a must for under each eye and don’t forget to accessorize with a drop of Schilling’s FD&C #2 Yellow food dye in each eye before that all-important C&P  Meet and Greet.  Wear shabby, loose-fitting clothes and say little. You impress them to no end. I guarantee it.

Ladies and gentlemen, meet Jack LaLanne :

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp11/Files4/1136713.txt

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, C&P exams, Tips and Tricks | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Praetorian Guard?

When Julius Caesar ascended to power. all military forces in his presence were disarmed except for his personal bodyguard-the Praetorian Guard.

When Hitler came to power, all military men in his presence were required to remove or turn in their sidearms except for his personal bodyguards-the SS.

Remember Leon Panetta? The one who got caught with purloined documents stuffed down his pants coming out of the Library of Congress several years ago? When he went to Kabul last week all American military guards on the flightline at Bagram Airpatch were relieved of their clips for their M-16s-ergo no ammo. I received this tidbit from my son in law’s brother who was there (unarmed). The only ones allowed arms were the private-contract security guards (read Blackwater) who accompanied him. What does this  tell us about our leaders? Can it be that paranoia strikes deep? Do our elected leaders and their shills fear our very own troops? I could understand it if they took Afghan soldiers’  weaponry as they are a documented risk.

Recall that the crazed muslim shooter at Fort Hood, Major Hassan, was unopposed because America’s very own troops on an American Base in America were effectively neutered and the only armed souls about were private security? Gee, what’s wrong with this picture? Loyal American troops taught in the arts of weaponry and war, instructed in their use and implementation, yet deprived of the possession of same for fear of…? Shucks, you say. There’s no threat to troops on base in America except for the occasion lunatic muslim shrink. When you train for war, you keep the implements of it at hand. Using troops to police the parade grounds for cigarette butts went out after Basic.

Many progressive types insist on a tortured reading of the Second Amendment to arrive at the consensus that the right is a collective militia or military one. Now we are greeted with the prospect that our leaders don’t even trust them. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. When the current leader of the free world proposes striking a medal and awarding it to those who refrain from shooting, and instead, attempt to beat their opponents to death with their lips, it’s time to start worrying.

When you are forced to disarm your own troops for fear of getting fragged, you’ve lost the war. We learned that 40 years ago. Trust in the military was implicit. You trusted that the idiot in front of you and behind you knew how to safety his/her weapon. You prayed that these fellow warriors had enough sense to bend the cotter pins over on the M-26s when they took them out of the box. The operable word is trust in each statement. Your train for this. You prepare for this. It’s ingrained into your very soul like breathing. You eventually don’t even need to think about it. Your thumb just automatically stroked the safety every so often to make sure it hadn’t inadvertently been  bumped or moved. You probably tickled your grenades occasionally to assure yourself those cotter pins hadn’t snagged on your Alice Pack.

Yet we are now faced with a Command structure that only hands you your weapon when you get to the boonies. Likewise they issue ammo and request it be turned in when not in use. Trust, as a major component of our military is evaporating before our eyes. A closer examination of why seems to focus on the mental aspect of too many deployments. Perhaps there is a darker side to this personality disorder discussion which the Madigan shrinks are avoiding.

If you have a no deposit, no return philosophy about your troops and use them up like toilet paper, then this makes sense. Use them, abuse them and then lose them. At some point there is going to be a reckoning. Soldiers are rapidly coming to the conclusion, due to this “personality disorder” paradox down at JBLM, that there is something amiss. The advent of the internet allows all things to become known in short order. The days of the Stars and Stripes fishwrap as the sole source of info is long gone. Where once commanders were highly respected by their troops, the norm these days is one of benign tolerance. No longer is the “One man is an Army” philosophy taught. Hillary Clinton’s “It Takes A Village” is now de rigeur and required reading.

Wars in ages past had a purpose, such as it was. There was a clearly defined goal and an identified, uniformed enemy. We were “in the right” morally and philosophically, and “they” were wrong. In conflicts today, the ROE’s are numerous and the punishment for error is sudden and swift. No more is there a clear definition of enemy. They wear no uniform, have no respect for life, including their own, and can trade allegiances in a heartbeat. They have to be accorded respect and given a voice to present their grievances. Our soldiers have to attend sensitivity classes now so as not to hurt their feelings or offend them. They object to the drinking of alcohol but there is mere silence when the subject of hashish or opium is raised. The object of war is to turn the enemy’s territory into a parking lot. The concept is to demoralize them so thoroughly that they have no will to resist. Once hostilities cease there is time for milk and cookies, but not a moment sooner.

Our troops are not being employed to sweep the field. They’re being utilized as policemen. They have been deprived of the training they prepared for and are now helping build schools and latrines.  They distribute candy and toys to children in hopes that it will placate them. Throw in an IED every once in a while and you have a recipe for unmitigated, uncontrollable rage. Why would this docile populace rise up and strike back? Haven’t they been given all manner of presents?

What Sgt. Bales did last week should not come as a surprise to anyone in the military-neither in the rank and file or in the command structure. Watching your future and your finances at home go up in smoke while you are afield three thousand miles away has to weigh on your mind constantly. Having committed yourself totally to a life in the military and being turned down for a promotion a few times when you’re qualified can make you question your career path and the choices you’ve made.  Four combat deployments in his eleven years? Hello? McFly?

The fact that the media have already been the judge and jury on this will sway public opinion in a negative way. The decision on the good Sgt. has already been made. His fate is sealed even though they haven’t even assembled the Judge, jury and the firing squad. An example will be made to cow the others. Further restrictions will be implemented to curb the indiscriminate possession of ammo unless needed to shoot back when shot at. Hand grenades will be stamped with serial numbers and accounted for every evening at 1800 hrs before chow call. Pretty soon recruits will have to be neutered or spayed when they enlist to curb “undesirable impulses”. Paxil will become standard issue like salt tablets and they will check to make sure you swallow them while standing in line at the mess hall. And we were worried about the sunset and rescission of DADT?  Shoot, bubba. You ain’t seen nothing yet. It’s a brave new world out there and its getting more politically correct every day. Cowboys and “personal initiative” are a thing of the past. Marching in lockstep is the order of the day, now.

Posted in General Messages, Gulf War Issues, vA news | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

HANG ‘EM HIGH–Gee, what about the Muslim Dude?

Member Tom ( the guy currently holding the most ratings here at about 260%) had this to contribute:

After reading the headlines today about the US soldier who shot up Afghanistan civilians, I couldn’t help noticing an irony.  There is all this clamor to try this guy quickly and execute him, never mind his having suffered a traumatic brain injury.  Yet this Major Hasan, who shot up Fort Hood while screaming Allah akbar, still hasn’t stood trial, and they are still debating whether he was insane, even with the clear evidence regarding his motive: slay as many infidels as possible.  So we have a guy in a war zone who cracks, and he must be executed immediately.  But this Muslim psychiatrist who was stateside in a nice safe office all day murders 13, wounds 29 of our own guys, and they try to argue the poor lad suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome, from listening to real soldiers who had actual battle experience.  Two and a half years later, they still haven’t tried the murderous bastard.

Posted in General Messages, Gulf War Issues, vA news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BvA–HCV DUE TO PTSD

Nice clean decision without a bunch of double talk. Easy to follow with good cites and all you need for a DYI. Beat PTSD gently, then stir in HCV slowly for several years. Bake in a slow oven for 23 years until cirrhosed. Serve piping sick.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp11/Files4/1138414.txt

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, PTSD, Tips and Tricks, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

BvA– Sorry, No Exam Buddy

Imagine having had Hep in service and still actually being jaundiced at discharge. Then compound it by filing and getting the Gettysburg address absent the part about “For he who shall have borne the battle…”. Come back thirty three years later and refile. Witness in utter horror your claim run up on the RO rocks without so much as a C&P exam even though you have documented evidence and a solid nexus.

Pay two hundred dollars or double the third roll of the dice after an idiotic DRO boondoggle to get out of ROLA. Arrive at the BvA and finally get it straightened out. So solly, Chahlie. We blew it on the Dx in 1973. The vA examiner’s rationale was a little askew. Fortunately we got it right in 2011. What’s that? No, sonny. We don’t pay back to ’73. It would be nice if we did but we’d be broke if we ran this ship like that.
As noted, the Veteran filed a claim for entitlement to service connection for a liver disability shortly after separation, and a December 1973 rating decision determined that no chronic disability was present. Laboratory reports indicate a diagnosis of hepatitis C, confirmed by liver biopsy, in 1996. The Veteran has submitted statements from treating physicians which indicate care for the disorder from that time to the present. The Veteran has not been given a VA gastrointestinal examination to determine the etiology of his hepatitis; however, given a very probative opinion by a private physician, the Board determines that such an opinion is unnecessary. 

That’s pretty funny, huh? Vet has Hx of hep in service, lottsa post service confirmation of hepatitis and just plain lottsa hep. today. Hmm, what do you think Bob. Should we send the Vet out for a Dog and Pony show at QTC? Naw, the C&P fund is killing us this quarter. QTC charges too much. I’d say it was acute and all his symptoms resolved before discharge. You? Yep. I’m game. Write it up. You think this stuff is made up? Perhaps readers have a more cogent theory on how it goes down. Groves v. Peake ought to put this puppy to bed. Therein lies the problem. The M-21 doesn’t have a LexisNexis VA CD attached to it. No flies on the raters.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp11/Files4/1138995.txt

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, Nexus Information, Tips and Tricks | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

OCCUPY LAvA? NOT WITH VETERANS

This will make your hair stand up. I did a blurb on the West LA VA Campus the other day, but this is beyond the pale. Fifty mil for solar (from SOLYNDRA?) and nobody has a pot to piss in let alone a window to throw it out of?  Some here and on other Vets’ sites feel I am over the top sometimes with my feelings towards the vA.  After seeing this, I’m not sure if I’m capable of being open-minded anymore.

OccupyVA_BillboardsMarathon

Please do me a favor and spread this abomination around to your Veteran Friends. This is the first time I’ve ever asked you guys to do this. It’s perverted what they are doing. It’s worse than it appears because the homeless are the least empowered and capable of voicing their displeasure. It’s not like Katy Couric is going to show up and demand justice for them. Or Geraldo. Or Oprah. Billboards? Are you serious. You can’t eat billboards or use them for shelter- unless you’re looking for shelter from Public Opinion.

Posted in Complaints Department, General Messages, Gulf War Issues, HOMELESS VETERANS, PTSD, vA news | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

PTSD and Tire Wear.

When your tires on your vehicle become worn, you retire the old ones and put on new. This is common sense. To drive with worn ones will eventually result in an accident of being left in the lurch somewhere. War-weary soldiers, like worn tires, must be given a reprieve when they are over-employed. As this article so readily points out, we were never designed mentally to be subjected to the stresses we are putting our troops through now. They can’t see the forest for the trees, and their commanders are instructed to keep it that way. The shrinks are instructed to keep certifying them as good to go. Force retention mandates ensure the ranks are filled-but filled with what?

I received this from Bob who has his ear on the railroad tracks and hears a lot:

 

Every Modern Marine knows the name Chesty Puller, a general that is now the template by which all measure themselves. But not so many know the story of Smedley Butler a Major General, recipient of the Brevet medal from one action and two Congressional Medals of Honor for two other separate actions. The only Marine so honored.

The reason for this may be the jaundiced view he developed toward the end of his career towards America at war: “I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers.

 

He was a veteran’s advocate and wrote the book “War is a Racket”. His distrust of bankers was public and intense.

Knowing today that the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was based on at least one false flag operation and having so recently been sent into Iraq, a nation ruled by a despicable villain, but not one that had WMDs or had ever attacked the US, it seems that little has changed in the century between his wars and ours. Yet there are 3 issues I have noticed that disturb me for our nation’s security going forward.

First and most dangerous is the outsourcing of security to civilian companies. The role of protecting our diplomats was once the job of Marines but just last week the Secretary of Defense visiting Afghanistan had combat troops disarm before coming into his presence, a tacit admission that Washington knows how badly today’s troops have been treated and thus fears them, trusting their security instead to mercenaries and CIA paramilitary assets.

The second issue may explain the first: we have enslaved anyone so innocently trusting that they join the service. The two Presidents Bush combined for two Force Depletion extensions; obligating new recruits to 9 years of service. I am not aware of anyone who did 4 combat tours in Vietnam or Korea, certainly no one who did not volunteer for it. Today 3 or 4 tours are common. We have simply worn our troops out. The cowardice to detain volunteers for extra duty to avoid a politically untenable draft is, simply put, reckless endangerment on a national scale.

Finally it is the combination of unprecedented numbers of badly broken troops returning to a medical and administrative machine that fixes their reports of those troops condition to fit political needs, rather than those of the patient, that poses the most frustrating (and despicable) problem for active military, older Veterans deserving of help with the conditions they have suffered from their service and then the security of the nation at large. What kind of parent would recommend military service to their child today? We have again betrayed the best of us, those who came when duty called, and they have every reason to carry a sense of that betrayal, and the distrust of our government, for the rest of their lives. We can bail out Bank of America and countless others but we can not bring ourselves to offer proper care and relief by drafts on our treasury or populace.

War is a racket… Now more than ever.

Posted in All about Veterans, Gulf War Issues, PTSD, vA news | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Red Cross Contributions

The Red Cross representative called us asking if we could contribute to the floods in Pakistan this year. I told her we’d love to but our garden hose only reaches the end of the driveway.

Posted in Humor, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

BvA–Texas Fenderson Rating Via West Virginia

While I know this occurred after the wheels were in motion on WGM’s claim, it seems an amazing coincidence. I’m willing to bet Mr. West Virginia heard about all those hot shot Texas Veterans Commission Service Officers and moved there. Stands to reason.

The long and the short of this claim is 12 years. You will notice they had to go way back with the Fenderson method to get it right. Now, I’m not saying they got it right yet, because there’s a high probability that this isn’t over. He could appeal this if he’s not satisfied. I would because I don’t trust them.

This Vet filed in 2001 and finally got the magic paper in 05. That’s when it started to slow down. Here we are in 2012 and the VLJ is finally writing the last chapter at 810 Vermont St. NW. What appears to be simple isn’t. A Fenderson claim will look at every scrap of paper in the evidence bin and sometimes they come up with the darnedest explanations for their conclusions. Here, from what I see, it appears he got a fairly good assessment and justice was mostly fair. Readers will note what also appears to be a stinky spot from 2002 to 2008. The reason for that is simple. The Vet, whether through error or a mistake, had an opportunity to fix this while waiting for his appeal to come up, but did not submit any new, private medrecs for that period. That was a big mistake if indeed he had any. This is why his rating will be stuck on 40% during the period. If he’d had any supporting evidence to rebut it, the VA would have bumped him up to 60%. He obviously had some pretty convincing evidence to warrant the  100% rating from 2008 on, so it is self-explanatory.

This decision clearly shows the danger of pursuing two similar disease processes where only one is warranted. The BVA here is giving him the 40% based strictly on DC 7354 for hepatitis but jumps ship and goes into DC 7312 (cirrhosis) in 2008. The hepatitis now becomes the less-dominant disease process in their demented minds. Which is all well and fine for Mr. New to Houston as he gets the big banana from 2008.

What is miserly about this decision is this little fact:

As reported above, the Veteran has raised the issue of entitlement to TDIU since the inception of the appeal. The records reflects that, as of April 10, 2001, the Veteran held a combined 70 percent service-connected rating based upon hepatitis C, rated as 40 percent disabling; posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rated as 30 percent disabling; diabetes mellitus, rated as 20 percent disabling; tinnitus, rated as 10 percent disabling; and bilateral hearing loss, rated as noncompensable. Thus, the Veteran was eligible for a TDIU rating under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a).  

TDIU may be awarded TDIU based upon a showing that the Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due solely to impairment resulting from his service-connected disabilities. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.340, 3.341, 4.16. Consideration may be given to the Veteran’s level of education, special training, and previous work experience in arriving at a conclusion, but not to his age or the impairment caused by any nonservice-connected disabilities. See 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.341, 4.16, 4.19. 

It is clear that the claimant need not be a total ‘basket case’ before the courts find that there is an inability to engage in substantial gainful activity. The question must be looked at in a practical manner, and mere theoretical ability to engage in substantial gainful employment is not a sufficient basis to deny benefits. The test is whether a particular job is realistically within the physical and mental capabilities of the claimant. 

Addressing this matter in a practical manner, including consideration of the service-connected impairments involving multiple bodily systems, the limited types of employment available to the Veteran given his disability status and limited education and vocational experience, and his credible testimony of being unable to work due to service-connected disabilities as of April 10, 2001, the Board resolves reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran by finding that his service-connected disabilities have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment for the time period from April 10, 2001 to October 2, 2002. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107. The appeal on the TDIU issue is granted. 

Mr. VLJ and his merry men thus split the TDIU melon down the middle, carve off an 1/8 and give it to Mountain Man. They promptly turn about and take it  back, returning him to 70% for six years until his liver hits bingo. Suddenly he’s 100% again. Talk about Ricochet Rabbit.

The decision perfectly incorporates the theory of not only TDIU, but the Fenderson method of staged ratings. This fellow was lucky that he had a fairly detailed medical file. But for the DM2, and the ascites, he’d probably have lost weight. This may seem like a long time to adjudicate one of these things. Frankly, it is. He depended on the RO kids to do him right which they didn’t. He ended up appealing it because the mindset on these things at the AOJ is denial. With that sure knowledge, his best path lay in beating feet to D.C. right out of the denial and taking care of business there. DRO reviews are all well and fine but all they do in the long run is put you in a holding pattern waiting to take off to D.C. Unless you have evidence that is going to rock the DRO’s world, you’re wasting your time. DROs specialize in post hoc rationalizations and fabricating the denial furniture to fit the facts as they interpret them. They do all this from the original denial, too. They usually take any new exculpatory evidence and fashion it to fit the denial better rather than the obverse.

Check it out. This one is an excellent example of so much you need to know. The judge is also being mighty liberal with the money here, too. When you look at the bottom, you see why

____________________________________________
T. MAINELLI
Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (aka wet behind the ears)

Pour yourself an ice tea, download this puppy, print it and get out the yellow highlighter.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp11/Files5/1144158.txt

See. These  State SO guys in Texas even wear white hats.

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, Tips and Tricks, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment