WE LOVE VETS…BUT

This is in the same vein as Mineral Wells, Texas. Everyone is tripping over themselves to tie the Yellow Ribbon ’round the old oak tree until they find it growing in their front yard. Then its NIMFY time. It’s time Americans really got behind their Vets in their actions and not just in words. 

Posted in All about Veterans, Gulf War Issues, PTSD | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WHAT’S IN THE WATER IN MINERAL WELLS?

Verboten

Verboten

We always consider Texas to be the bedrock of the nation where patriotism and love of America resides. They can’t be all bad. They fought with the South. So what do you figure is up down there in Mineral Wells? I say they’re smoking left handed, Waco tobacco and are a little touched in the head. Maybe the heat got to them. Whatever the cause, I do hope they return to their common sense and realize they’re destroying their political careers. They might as well have said they were all awarded the CMOH and fought in Afghanistan.

Why is it everyone has to rearrange the world to their liking? America is a big boat and there’s room for everyone without rocking it. While I rarely advocate these things, perhaps some of you will join me in rocking their boat by contacting them. Member, Vietnam War Veteran and founder Harry Hooks sent this one to me. I hear from him only when he’s extremely perturbed. I suppose this would do it.

What say you give Mayor Mike Allen and his Peanut Gallery a big  Howdy and a heapin’ helpin’ of what Veterans think about their grand scheme to keep that crappy cemetery policed of teddy bears and flags.

Posted in All about Veterans, Complaints Department | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

HARDSHIP CLAIMS

One would think that the vA would have a soft spot for those Veterans who are so horribly disadvantaged that they find themselves financially or medically strapped to meet their obligations. When they succumb to lack of funds and are forced to seek shelter or food from family, this would normally constitute the conditions I associate with hardship. Apparently I am wrong.

To put this in perspective, by 2008 I was in the hole about $250,000.00 and getting ready to find a new zip code for Cupcake and myself. vA looked at my numerous credit card balances, second mortgage and other medical info that said I was in deep medical doo-doo and granted my request for advancement so I could get P&T while I was on this side of the grass. Mind you, they don’t tell you they are granting it. They just speed things up after a 90-day review of your circumstances. If you pass the audition you move over to the Group W bench and are seen on a first come, first served basis.

Member JM and I have been working on his hardship filing for the last several months. He has intractible knee issues that are documented on his medical discharge yet vA insists he’s ready for the Ninja Warrior series on TV. Well, we’ve actually been trying to get him SC sooner rather than later. The hardship venue is just an attempt to get it done in 2012 rather than the mythological 125 day/2015 mantra being handed out like necklaces at Mardi Gras. No dice. vA is going to move at their usual snail’s pace regardless of how much plastique you pack under their ass.

JM emailed last night with this lovely rejoinder to his continuing saga. He’s been on the IRIS path for about three weeks pursuing this. I had no idea you need to actually occupy a house illegally to qualify. That’s right. You need to let your mortgage go south, quit paying the utility bills, stiff everybody you owe money to and mail in the proof. Homelessness and living in your parent’s basement is not considered a hardship. In fact, after you lose all the amenities of a home and job, you are still not in a hardship predicament unless you can prove they’re getting ready to cut off the power to the place you don’t own anymore. Huh?

Read this:

 Discussion Thread
 Response via Email Via Email (Department of Veterans Affairs) 06/28/2012 05:01 PM
IRIS #XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDear Mr. JM:

There are specific criteria for hardship request. Unfortunately, your bankruptcy and overdue VA medical bill does not meet the criteria for a hardship request. A hardship request should include evidence such as foreclosure notice, past due utilities statement, and eviction notice.

Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Sincerely yours,

DOUGLAS C. CHAPMAN

Douglas C Chapman
Veterans Service Center Manager

How to Contact VA:
On line: www.va.gov
By phone:  (800) 827-1000 (please allow 5-6 hours for one of our vA counselors to help you. We are experiencing delays extending into 2015 right now and if you’d quit filing claims we could serve you better)
 (800) 829-4833 (TDD hearing impaired)

By fax: (404) 929-5586

By letter:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Atlanta Regional Office
P O BOX 100021
Decatur, GA 30031-7021

 

It’s odd. I was told by a VSO that the threshold requirement was a financial debt in excess of $3,500.00 and /or medical issues that might cause death before they finish the adjudication. JM is “existing” at the whim of his parent’s largesse in allowing him to occupy the basement rec room. He gets to eat there while he tries to weather this financial/medical maelstom that engulfs him. VA must think he’s kicked back in the lap of luxury eating popcorn and watching The Young and the Breastless and Family Feud all day.

Relax. This is the new, improved vA. Jm has graduated to the ranks of the 1%ers. He’s rich. No debt. No financial problems to mention. His bankruptcy erased his financial obligations and he has no outstanding overdue utility bills because…he no longer has a home. One of these days they’ll acknowledge the knee problem and he’ll be remunerated. Until then? Well, pilgrim thousands before you have bit the bullet and soldiered on. Where’s that fine entrepreneurial spirit that built America? Get off your dead ass and hobble off to work. If you can’t find any, why, try the Vocational Rehabilitation and Education Program for disabled Vets. Whoops. Back up. Get that rating of 30% or more first and then go to VR&E. Pretty confusing? JM thinks so. vA doesn’t.


Posted in All about Veterans, Complaints Department, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , | 9 Comments

WHERE HAVE ALL THE DOCTORS GONE?

Ever wonder where that reprobate excuse for a doctor disappeared to after he amputated the wrong leg off your uncle? How about the doctor who 86d the appendix when he should have been looking over to the right at the gall bladder? Well, wonder no more.

When doctors find themselves employment-challenged due to medical mistakes, they revert to the default setting– the vAMC. That’s right. You can have the worst medical record in the world, leave a trail of destruction in your wake and still find employment at the vA. The trick? Why, simply keep your license to practice in at least one state.

Most doctors have a license to practice in multiple states so the loss in one is not financially life-threatening. The vA is more than willing to accept you if you are still legal in at least one of 50 states if it comes to that. How comforting to know that you’re getting the best medical care vA can purchase from substandard practitioners.

I never checked the bona fides of the chowderheads that turned me into hamburger helper  but perhaps I should have. One young, up and coming fellow named Brent S______ did the two surgeries (#1&#3)that disintegrated and caused me so much grief. I wonder if he moved here from Oklahoma? I will always wonder who made the call to implant the biggest piece of Alloderm they make to hold in my belly considering it was recalled 3 years before they used it. Doesn’t that stuff have a shelf life?

Welcome to vAMC medical care. It’s the model used for the Affordable Health Care Act as far as I can see. And the next time you visit, check to see if they have installed more chairs in the waiting rooms as they did at American Lake VAMC. Dead Vets are Happy Vets, apparently.

P>S. I can’t resist. I know it’s bad form to change posts afterwards but his deserves the add in. Member Mike (who sent me the piece on why he, and you, may not get that new liver) just emailed to tell me something I didn’t know…

Good morning! On your post today, you forgot to mention that the VA employees have Blue Cross medical for themselves. They wouldn’t want to trust their health on some Dr with their degree from the Dominican Republic or Granada.

Notice the shiny new ileostomy bag?  Free with every botched anastomosis only at vA.

Posted in All about Veterans, Medical News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

SOUTHERN FRIED HUMOR

Successful alumnus WGM returns with some excellent humor. I was born and raised south of the Mason-Dixon Line so this is right down my alley whether he knew it or not. It richly deserves a home here to cheer up some of you who desperately need it. I publish, forewith, that which you need to live life by.

Georgia 

The owner of a golf course in Georgia was confused about paying an invoice, so he decided to ask his secretary for some mathematical help.


 He called her into his office and said, “Y’all graduated from the University of Georgia and I need some help.  If I wuz to give yew $20,000, minus 14%, how much would you take off?”

 The secretary thought a moment, and then replied, “Everthang but my earrings.”

Louisiana

A senior citizen in Louisiana was overheard saying … “When the end of the world comes, I hope to be in Louisiana .”

When asked why, he replied, “I’d rather be in Louisiana ’cause everythang happens in Louisiana 20 years later than in the rest of the world.”

Mississippi

The young man from Mississippi came running into the store and said to his buddy, “Bubba, somebody just stole your pickup truck from the parking lot!”
 

Bubba replied, “Did y’all see who it was?”
 

The young man answered, “I couldn’t tell, but I got the license number.”

North Carolina

A man in North Carolina had a flat tire, pulled off on the side of the road, and proceeded to put a bouquet of flowers in front of the car and one behind it. Then he got back in the car to wait.
 

A passerby studied the scene as he drove by, and was so curious he turned around and went back.  He asked the fellow what the problem was.
 

The man replied, “I got a flat tahr.”
 

The passerby asked, “But what’s with the flowers?”
 

The man responded, “When you break down they tell you to put flares in the front and flares in the back. I never did understand it neither.”

Tennessee

A Tennessee State trooper pulled over a pickup on I-65.  The trooper asked, “Got any ID?”
 

The driver replied, “Bout whut?”

Texas

The Sheriff pulled up next to the guy unloading garbage out of his pick-up into the ditch. The Sheriff asked, “Why are you dumping garbage in the ditch?  Don’t you see that sign right over your head.”

“Yep,” he replied. “That’s why I’m dumpin’ it here, ’cause it says: ‘Fine For Dumping Garbage.’ Don’t they teach you fellers to read before they give you a badge?” 

 
Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How to “not lose” your VA claim a la Sellers.

If you are a Veteran, appealing your claim either at the CAVC level or the BVA level, you need to read over Ask Nod’s interpretations of Sellersas well as the judges’ dicta.

While many Vets want to “win” their claim, it is more important to “not lose” your claim! I shall endeavor to explain the difference between “winning” and “not losing” even though I shall admit it is an issue of semantics.

A Veteran who seeks to “win” his claim, gets his wife or girl friend to help him write a nice letter to the VA, in the form of a NOD, explaining how much he deserves his benefits (and how much he needs the money) and how sick he is.    The VA should not care whether or not he “perfected” his appeal with the appropriate I9, or even if he sent in the NOD after the one year appeal period.  He should still be able to “win” right?  Wrong.  The VA is going to follow the regulations to the letter, and your failure to do so will result in a denial, even if your girl friend sends in her panties (along with nude pics)  to the VA judges.

Instead, the Veteran needs to “not lose” his case.   Let the VA be the one to make legal errors.   They will likely oblige, reminding you that the rating specialist who made your RO decision was unlikely to have a degree in law, and neither did his boss.   Instead, RO decisions are incorrect more than 75.8% of the time, regardless of how many times the VA pretends otherwise.   The chairmans report explains this in detail, but you need to know how to interpret the numbers.

On page 22, it shows that a mere 24.2 percent of Veterans claims are (again) denied at the BVA level, indicating there is at least some type of error necessitating either a remand or an outright award of benefits by the BVA more than  ¾ths of the time.   If you live to see your appeal to at least the Federal Circuit level, then you odds of “not losing” at least a remand are even better, because the CAVC overturns some of the BVA decisions as do the Federal Courts.

By “not losing” you don’t bother to tell the VA how sick you are, and how your girlfriend also thinks you should get your benefits, too, as that will make her life easier.   Instead, you take what the VA says in its “reasons and bases” for decision and refute it.  

    Do not tell the VA judge what ” you think” in your appeal.   He is uninterested in your opinion.    While it may make you feel better to vent how the VA mistreated you, do that instead in an ASK NOD comment.   The VA wont beleive a word you say, but they will defend whatever THEY SAY to the death.  So, nail them on their R&B (rhythme and blues..ok..reasons and bases) because they can not refute what they themselves say.  This is succintely pointed out in Sellers:

On page 8 of Sellers, the Veteran quotes the DRO who stated:

“We tried to grant the benefit from our perspective, but the front office said No! This is an incorrect decision.”

This is the VA admitting the decision was incorrect.  This is not the Veterans opinion!   You see, no one likes to admit they are lying and the VA is no different.  They can’t say the decision was correct on one hand and have an employee on record state the decision was incorrect.  This is the “Ah Ha” moment.  Once this employee said this, the VA can not change their position without new evidence, as pointed out by Sellers:

Once notice has been issued pursuant to section 5104(a), the RO may not effect any revisions to its decision, sua sponte, on the same factual basis, without a finding of CUE. . Binding the RO at the time section 5104(a) notice is issued serves to “preclude repetitive and belated readjudication of veterans’ benefit[s] claims.” . Binding the
RO at such time also activates a claimant’s ability to accept its decision or appeal the decision to the Board.”   Sellers vs Shinseki, citations omitted.

In summary, don’t try to win your case by telling the VA how sick you are or how much you need the money.  Instead, “don’t lose” your case by showing how the VA made legal errors, quoting their own words against them, not your own opinions.

Posted in Guest authors, Tips and Tricks, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CAVC–SELLERS v. SHINSEKI–MACKLEM II

VetCourtAppealsPromoThis may be the best decision you’ll read in 2012. It’s a daisy. It just makes me giggle every time I go back over the analysis. It will remind you of Leroy Macklem’s high adventures in CUE land. What’s more, the Secretary’s vain attempts to argue his way back to a win are priceless. When apprised of his errors, he tries all the harder in a different direction. We get one shot at this and must have all the evidence in by decision time including theories on why we should win. Eric feels he should get a punch list and keeps tossing out “Okay, that won’t fly. How about this…”

You will see Ivan the Terrible dismiss his attorneys for incompetence after they mangle his evidence submission. It says he was going alone pro se but I see he has several rainmakers on site for the brief. Good deal. Take your protein pills and put your helmets on pilgrims. This is a wild ride with a great ending.

Let’s begin with Leroy. He won because vA cheated with the Extraordinary Awards Program. Ivan will win for similar reasons. He too got the “You won the Lotto!” call. It occurred two years before the EAP deal but that’s irrelevant. They were doing this without an official EAP even then and now the Court knows this. What’s more is that they probably still are. The Court doesn’t like it when you cheat. And when you get caught, it gets ugly. They don’t slap your hand and remand. They reverse. This little bozo is going to cost about $550,00.00 up front and then $2924.00 more every month unless he goes totally blind. If so, he’s going to be up in the SMC R range of about $8K a month. Baaaad vA. Let’s see what happened.

Ivan R. Sellers (no relation to Peter) was a groundpounder from 66-73. He wore glasses but snuck in under the presumption of soundness. Nine days after discharge, still in the golden window of presumption, he noticed some serious eye issues developing. As we all know how these things work, his eye could be falling out of the socket and they’d say “Hmm. You can still see out of it, right?” So he was good to go in their eyes (pun intended).

1982 rolled around and Ivan noticed his eyes were pooping out on him. By 1988, he knew he had to get help. Ta-da. File a vA claim. They’re the go-to agency, right? Trust them he did, yessss. vA raters disassembled and reassembled the denial and finally decided he had this all along. vA said it was genetic even though no one in his family ever had it. It was not a vA issue and he failed to appeal. End of the claim.

In February 2004, he filed a CUE claim based on his theory that they screwed up the 1988 adjudication. He had been reading a lot and finally figured it out. I’m sure his doctor said “Ivan, listen. Those chowderhead vA doctors at the RO are blowing smoke up your ass. Are you going to believe me or them? This thing started long ago when you were in the service.”

On June 14th of that year, one of vA’s finest- Cynthia Canady-called him up via landline and told him he’d struck gold. Yes, indeed. He was right all along. It had been CUE to deny him back in 1988 and vA, being a stand up organization, was going to step up to the plate and make it good with him. But not only had he won, they were throwing in a car allowance worth about $11 K more. Ivan was peeing in his pants with joy. I’m sure he sat down and roughed out what it would add up to. If not, he had a VSO who told him. Perhaps one of his drinking buddies down at the AMLEG bar. Who knows?

A week went by with no news. On the 21st, Cynthia emailed a note to the rep. asking where to mail the decision. At the same time she got Mrs. Sellers on the phone and asked about dependents and the requirements for it. We’ve all been there after we win. The mad scramble to the County courthouse to find the old divorce records? Been there. Done that. Twice.

After another week of no show, Ivan called Cynthia and asked what the holdup was. He was itching to get that new Dodge Magnum and we all know what MOPAR fever can do to you. Cynthia told him to sky down as these things take a little time. She did tell him that the settlement was going to be in the give or take column of $495.963.03. Ivan reasoned that since the cat was in the bag, he could chill for a while.

Late July rolled in. It was ski boat season and Ivan was itching to get out there on the water. He called Cynthia again and politely asked what was up. Still no baksheesh and Detroit was running low on Magnum color choices. Cynthia was a little nonplussed. She thought the rating would have been issued. She’d signed off on it and done the paperwork. The magic number now stood at $535,233.33 with a one-time $11K for the vehicle allowance.

About the second week into September, Ivan was becoming annoyed. How long could it possibly take? Another call to Cynthia revealed some troubling news. In spite of the fact that it already had two signatures, it was “back in ratings”. Ruh-oh, Rorge.  Just about this time Cynthia could smell something odiferous emanating from the claims room and abruptly said “Dude. I wish I could help but this is where my involvement ends. If you have any queshuns, call the 800 number. I’m outta here.” And so she was.

He started asking more questions towards the end of the week and they pawned him off on the blind mens’ clinic down the hall at the VHA. They said they’d look into it for him (no pun intended). They never did. Why am I less than shocked?

The blind men’s clinic turned out to be DRO Beverly Cole who was more confused than Cynthia. All she knew was this thing had come to a crashing halt and now was occupying her in basket. Being a smart cookie, Bev decided to punt to the vA Regional Counsel  (vARC)at the SquareBob Sponge Pants RO in that famous underwater city on October 28th, 2004. We can be pretty certain that this had everybody’s attention at the C&P desk up in D.C. They had the 10X90 binoculars trained on it daily.

After dawdling five weeks and hoping Bev would forget, the vARC at NORO finally and reluctantly tried to extricate herself out from under this rotten apple. She decided to do the “speculation” dance and skate away. The important thing was to make Bev do the dirty deed in case it exploded unexpectedly like an IED. Thus she just said she was available to consult but wasn’t going to make any legal decisions up or down. She did point out that there appeared to be a decision in the C-file though. I’m sure Bev was looking at that particular sheet of paper about 20 times a day.

November 14th the sun rose high in the sky and Ivanovich sent off a missive to the Houston RO. He wasn’t happy. The blind men’s clinic was notably silent and Bev wasn’t talking. He wanted some answers fast and Houston was playing deaf and dumb. He kept this up and finally was called by a Houston rater who lost the short straw contest and thus was elected to give Ivan the bad news. Yep. We hear you, Ivan but it’s in New Orleans getting fitted for what will turn into the EAP in a few years, dude. Sit tight. We’ll get back to you as soon as we can get three signatures that will stick. They were still playing him like a small mouth bass and keeping him away from the underwater logs. The short straw guy insisted they couldn’t decide on 1988 or 1989 for the award date but give them some more time. Hear? This was unadulterated bull shit but Ivan was still very naive.

Getting ever nervous, Ivan motored on down to the HOURO in person and got some disturbing news. It appeared he was going to get an effective date of February 2004, not the expected 1988 or 89. In the meantime, Bev got the raters to scare up another medical opinion to see if they could get out of both the 1988 and the 2004 gig. Nobody wanted to cough up $550 K to Ivan so they had to do some fancy footwork. The eyeball specialist wouldn’t play ball. He went with the service-connected choice and wouldn’t speculate any further whether it was actually aggravated by service. He rightly reasoned that Ivan didn’t have it before service and he sure as hell did afterwards.

The bait and switch occurred on January 31, 2005. The HOURO granted SC but only from the 2004 filing date. To sweeten the pot and make him feel better, they threw in a housebound (SMC S), an adaptive housing grant and a new automobile with adaptive technology. Ivan wasn’t buying. He’d won Monty’s Cookie Jar behind door #3 and saw what was inside. Now the RO was trying to pawn off an Earl Sheib $99.95 paint job and a week’s supply of gas.

Somehow, Ivan had come into possession of the original June 1, 2004 rating agreeing CUE had occurred. He waved this around a few times with the NOD. It contained the same thing they were trying to saddle him with except for the effective date. That rating said March 25, 1988 and Ivan was holding them to it. The decision was undated but had the three signatures needed to be valid. Good to go? Not exactly.

Just before Christmas of 2006, Ivan got his DRO hearing in front of DRO Marian Peters at the HOURO. Yep, it took 21 months to get it (the hearing). Ivan laid it all out and Marian allowed as how they really, really tried to get this through “but the front office said No!”. Who it was in the front office will remain a mystery forever. Nevertheless, Marian promised to walk this through with the hearing transcript and get these mythological front office people to change their minds. This is also known as the Good cop/Bad cop ploy to gain the trust of your mark. Marian had no intentions of trying to convince anyone of anything. The real McCoy would have been to get Cynthia back in there and let her run it by the front office. I’m sure she’d been promoted and was enjoying her new digs in the C&P office in D.C. by then so that wasn’t an option. Her new job description was probably Binocular Girl.

Six months later, a new DRO entered the picture and reaffirmed what Miriam had promised to try to overcome- a front office review. I find this rather telling that they can’t let one DRO mookwalk this through. Perhaps DRO Dexter Levitt was enlisted because he’s a man and he could talk mano a mano with Ivan. No dice. Ivan wasn’t biting.

So, a year from the original wave-off, Ivan does another hearing-this time the BvA one with his new VLJ who he’s going to try to convince.  Ivan doesn’t get it. All the dancing bears and trained zebras are not going to change the decision. His VLJ is operating under strict orders to wrap this up amicably and give him the shaft gently.  Sure enough, six months later he gets the Dear John letter but they don’t even discuss the magic June 2004 “You won” correspondence. Ivan was dumbfounded. He was beginning to get the big picture but it always comes as a blow to the solar plexus when you think you’ve made your case only to realize they were funning you. I know. I’ve been strung along by a VLJ who gave me knowing head bobs at just the right moment and agreed with me whole heartedly every time I pointed to the smoking gun evidence. I figured I’d won, too. It’s unsettling to say the least.

Ivan dutifully filed his NOA and got in line. The Court, in a single judge decision kicked him below the belt again in June of 2011. They focused, as the Board did, strictly on the denial not being CUE and ignored the June 2004 grant document. Ivan must have been thinking this was a bad dream. He promptly filed to get a panel review pro se, canned his useless legal beagle and filed the June rating as proof he’d already won. Remember, this document was strangely absent in all these decisions even though it was large as life and twice as natural. He filed it with the NOD but it mysteriously sank down to the bottom of the C-file never to be seen again.

The Court remanded it back to the BvA to decide whether the document was “real” or if perhaps Ivan had manufactured it. They were also to determine if this was some precursor to a EAP that disenfranchised Ivan. The Board, with same bozo as VLJ, determined that the June 2004 document was genuine. Next he held that there was no EAP-like process. The mere fact that the C-file was transhipped to the Squarebob Spongepants RO and was reviewed by a high up Leagle Beagle was apparently just a coincidence or overlooked entirely. Hell, maybe C-files migrate naturally every year of their own accord.  Geese do. Stranger things than this happen in ROs all over America every day.

The long and the short was that Ivan had been given a fair shake and he just didn’t understand the process. If the decision he’d received was valid, it would have had a date stamp on it. Furthermore, if it had been a real decision, he’d have gotten it a lot sooner. So there it was. One of those Fig Newtons of the imagination. Cynthia had been mistaken. Miriam had been mistaken. Everyone had signed the wrong document and it was too bad. The bright side was he’d actually won so he had that going for him. Right?

Ivan marched smartly back to the Court unimpressed with the explanation and determined to get a good legalzoom.com reading on this from the panel. And get it he did. After a lot of parsing and head scratching, Judges Kasold, Hagel and Schoelen came down in his court. As well they should have. It makes no difference how he got the decision. The three magic signatures were the VASEC’s downfall. The idiots also included the 21-4107 appeals form and the auto grant in the original decision. They not only stepped on their necktie- they did a royal face plant of epic proportions. It didn’t help that they were trying to disguise a prelude to the later outlawed EAP procedure. The decision was lousy with all their errors. What amazes me was that a single judge let this get by him and affirmed it. That is the crime that stands out.

So justice prevailed. Ivan will join the ranks of the Leroy MacKlem’s in CAVC history. The raters at the Houston RO will either get fired , go through extensive retraining or be promoted and transferred to Oakland. We already have plenty of Gomers here in Seattle so I doubt there are any openings. Ivan has passed Go! And will collect his $558K. The C&P office will pretend they were on Mars when all this occurred so they aren’t guilty of anything. The binoculars, as well as any incriminating emails, are on the shredder room floor. If you try to get in touch with the vA Regional Counsel in New Orleans, you will probably discover there is no such beast and never has been.

All in all, this is one of those decisions that will disappear up its own asshole never to be seen again. Could be that Uncle Eric is going to be soooo pissed off he’ll appeal it up to the Federal Circus. My guess is he’ll try to bury it and take back the SMC S and the automobile grant just to spite Ivan and show him who really wears the pants at vA. Ivan will spend the rest of his few years of life appealing to get that back, too. In sum, we congratulate Ivan on a well-fought battle that should have never had to be fought. This is the stuff of dreams for us. Ivan the Terrible prevails. Goliath slain!

On behalf of HCVets and Asknod, we thank you for having the stamina to fight this and see it through to fruition, Ivan. You are a testimonial to Vets everywhere. Enjoy your retirement, too.

Posted in CAVC/COVA Decision, CUE, Veterans Law | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

vAOIG–EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT HOMELESS BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK

Here’s another OIG boondoggle that would make the Pope proud. Now that we know the how and why, we can cure the problem, right? Well…..not exactly. This far more complicated than we know and will require another $100,000.00 study and a trip to Maui to study the vA homeless contingent there and on Lanai.

Posted in HOMELESS VETERANS, vA news | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

VHA– WHY YOU MIGHT NOT BE GETTING THAT LIVER

Member Mike is a wizard, as are all of you in my mind. With all the nasty disease processes and depression piled high, you still manage to find time to dig these nuggets up. This one is a daisy. I commend each and every one of you, including some who prefer to remain nameless. I can hardly thank all of you for what you do to make this a truly great website for HCV as well as other quandaries. This is a classic example of things I think bear examination because they impact many of the members’ lives. Now that I’ve blown enough smoke rings, I give you the latest vA boondoggle. $250,000.00 later, let’s just leave things the way they are. Idiot’s Delight.

Posted in HCV Health, Medical News, vA news | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

vA–DOCTOR AND PONY SHOW

Almost on the heels of all the PTSD (PTSI?) news, here come all the VAMC Medical schools  chiming in with a “study” about what they should expect and be looking for. Duh? The disease has been labeled since 1982 so why the sudden 1000 yd. stare like a deer in the headlights and a new briefing on how/who/when and why.  If this is what they’re spending VHA health dollars on, vA is in way big doo-doo.

Posted in Gulf War Issues, Medical News, PTSD | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment