THIS JUST IN! VETERANS UPSET! NEWS AND FILM AT 6.

If it bleeds it leads, unless you’re a Veteran.

If a young man commits suicide, it’s on the AP newswire in less than five minutes, unless he’s a Veteran.

If a man waits five years for some meaningful recompense for an injury on the job, that is a meaningful story for a Sunday newspaper magazine article, unless he’s a Veteran.

If a man is evicted and loses his home, the local TV station is fond of showing up for some face time, unless he’s a deadbeat Vet looking for a handout.

If a man files a tax return, it is assumed he is filing it legitimately and not fraudulently, unless he’s a Veteran.

If a man is homeless and lives under a bridge, he is considered “economically marginalized”, unless, of course, he’s Veteran. In that case, he more likely than not made a personal decision to pursue this nomadic way of life. Veterans are “earthy”, after all.

I apologize. It isn’t that simple. As I have pointed out more than once, the Veterans Administration has denied (as in nada, no way, dreambucks, wish wampum, do not pass GO) on average, for the last 200 years, compensation to 85% of you. Let’s put that in perspective.

You call GEICO®. After several rings, a live, polite person and you discourse on how your fender is bent. You tell how it happened. You give the name, rank, airspeed and last known heading of vehicle to the adjudicator/adjudicratrix. You meet an estimator/estimatrix and together examine the damage. Several days later (and sometimes less) the adudicator/trix asks a few follow-up  inquiries and then hits Print and says “The check is in the mail”. Total time spent? Over three hours in two days.

You have a problem with your tax return. You call the 800 number and talk to the taxman/woman/tax mistress  and discuss the quandary. He/she answers by the third ring. The Problem is discussed. The Problem is resolved. Information on how to do it is entered (electronically). Forms arrive miraculously. It’s done. The taxman/woman hits print and says “The check’s in the mail, sir.” Time spent? 5 hours over three separate days.

At the VA INsurance COmpany (VAINCO), you cannot simply go into an RO anymore. You may be “economically marginalized” and have body odor issues that might disenfranchise others. Everyone is entitled to their space- well, except you. You’re a Veteran. So you are limited to the Postal service or the new Ebennies site. I neglect the numerous VSOs. I apologize for marginalizing them. Want to call them up and discuss something you don’t understand?  Try it. Please, I insist. Between the hours of 0800 Local to 1630, try calling 1-800-827-1000. Your cel phone battery will go dead before you talk to a warm body. By the end of the day, you will be asked for a callback number for a date sometimes a week in the future. What? A telephone backlog? Try saying that like Tim Allen. Aaauurrgh?

After a suitable period (six months?), you will be informed that VAINCO needs to know if the bumper was bent before you bought the new car. This invisible adjudicator(s) will further ask for proof you indeed own the vehicle. Registrations can be forged and often are. You are required to supply this. Your claim will be held in abeyance until you do. Think cryogenically frozen to 432 degrees below 0 Fahrenheit. Think LOX.

After you respond, you will need a hobby. Eventually, VAINCO will respond to your response with a denial. You file a NOD.

A discussion that your claim for new tires is unsupported by Les Schwab will arrive after nineteen months. You will be required to prove that the claim was for a bent bumper all over again because they lost the paperwork. Meanwhile the claim for the newly broken windshield is construed to be a claim to reopen the claim for  the bent bumper and discarded as a duplicate.

After a year and a half of this, you give up and throw the towel in. You just give up. Piss off. I’m done. Congratulations. Your claim has been resolved to your satisfaction according to VAINCO. Your bumper is still bent. Your windshield is still cracked and you are fit to be tied. 85% of you to be exact. This is the much-vaunted, ecofriendly, environment in which a Veteran may adjudicate his claim free of the strictures of “other, more restrictive” venues-e.g. one that grants the hallowed Benefit of the Doubt.

At VAINCO, your lay testimony is deemed to be credible until they catch you in a lie. Our fellow member Robert discovered they can formulate a mistruth, embellish it, record it as fact and then use your statement refuting it as evidence that your credibility is in tatters. Ah, the miracle of ex parte justice. How sweet the sound.

Now we have reached a crossroads. Americans are waking up seeing what we’ve known and lived for more decades than we wish to remember. Vets are getting the short end of the punji stick-the end with the brown stuff on it. Nothing like a little war or two for 10 years to manufacture a few Vets, huh? Devotees of the present Administration are actually becoming peeved that progress promised is not occurring. Egads. In fact, it’s worsening.

Blame has been (variously) apportioned to: lack of money, lack of trained personnel, too many Veterans filing, too many Veterans filing for multiple (Sacré Bleu) injuries, Mickey Mantle’s mom and undisclosed others. Everyone but the kitchen sink has been indicted.

Now we arrive at what many view as an equitable solution. Gee. Why not just pay the Veteran like the Infernal Revenue folks. If he cheated, we’ll come down on him like a new suit. We know where he/she is. They get a “PAYCHECK” every month. It’s not like they’re hiding in Bolivia. This sentiment does not sit well with Massah up to the big house on Vermont Ave.  Just as an aside, that must be a rub, what with Bernie Sanders being from up that way and all.  Delicious irony, that.

Getting back to the topic, the idea of just letting the claim be processed and taking the pressure off the DROs, RVSRs and VSRs is admirable. Why so much opposition? Why the foot-dragging? Something is horribly amiss. This is like Kim Jung the One blowing an ass gasket. There’s just no defensible reason for it. VA insists that Life, as we know it, will collapse and dirty, unkempt Veterans will be given untold sums of money to drink and carouse in Orlando. No, wait. Those were  the VA Human Resources retreats. I get them confused. Well, you get the drift. Veterans, most, if not all undeserving, will be given access to hundreds of dollars a month to squander on all manner of depravity. Drugs will probably play a big part of this. ETOH consumption across the country will increase. Veterans will start beating their wives. Encounter groups will have to be formed to deal with the influx of more dysfunctional Veterans.

This is no way to run the VA. For centuries this has been a political plum dumping ground for all but the most incompetent Veterans (the most incompetent Veterans having been swiftly relegated to the State Department). Only since the passage of the VJRA in 1988 has it picked up a caché of respectability. That caché can no longer mask the incompetence and  poor mishandling of our affairs. Simply stuffing it with retired, retread generals can no longer give it that respectability any more. Not since Jesse Brown has the VA truly been led by one of us. The rest have been rank imposters with low handicaps earned on our nickel.

Our President has some tall thinking to do. As the author of the article opines, if he can bail out the fat cats on Wall Street and the hurricane victims in New Jersey, what about a few hundreds of thousands of the great unwashed who served their country? Has the political leadership become so jaded that the hallowed meaning of “For he who shall have borne the battle, his widow and his orphan child” can be construed to mean ” You’ll just have to wait until we get around to it because we simply don’t trust you. You’re Veterans and inherently dishonest.”

I, for one, am proud of being one of the 8% unwashed. It’s a rather exclusive club if you can survive the initiation, the membership dues and resist the siren call to be homeless when you get out. Make sure you count your fingers, toes and legs/arms before you sign off on the form. They may accuse you of cutting them off afterward to  horn in on some of that easy money. Especially if you’re a Veteran.

One of the 85% of the great unwashed scheming to get benefits that are undeserved.

One of the 85% of the great unwashed scheming to get benefits that are undeserved.

Posted in All about Veterans, VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

VA OBFUSCATION

images (1)

When no less than thirteen former military personnel (of high rank) with intimate knowledge of the system tell you what you need to do to get a program properly implemented, you might want to take notes. When they write out the game plan and hand it to you, there are very few excuses you can summons later such as the dog ate it.

This came out in 2007. Regardless of whose tenure this occurred under, the fact remains that the repair order was posted and no one did anything about it. I find it incongruous that in 2010 the VASEC suddenly had an epiphany and the Eureka lightbulb of comic book fame came on over his head.

One thing I read this morning that made my stomach turn was the the latest VA-approved explanation for the backlog. It seems that Uncle Eric decided to grant service connection for Parkinson’s, IHD and hairy “b” cell leukemia to us AO Vets out of the kindness of his heart. No mention of the Institute of Medicine tasked with identifying these diseases and their correlation to AO. Just the bald assertion that Mr. Shinseki had seen the wisdom of doing it due to his compassionate regard for his fellow Vets. Bleh.

This whole business of the backlog is becoming more odoriferous by the moment. In the same article we are being prepared for worse. They mention that the backlog is (not might) going to get worse through the year before it gets better and now there is no “timetable” for a true 125 day adjudication. Well, there goes 2015. Can’t say they didn’t tell us ahead of time.

2013-04-08 101751

VA BACKLOG

images

Posted in VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

ROUND UP THE USUAL SUSPECTS

Your VAOIG at Work

Here’s the latest hot sheet on all those wonderful folks who help Vets. If what we see represents the tip of the iceberg, we can only wonder what isn’t detected and prosecuted.

Jamestown, NY VA Nurse Arrested, Charged With Distributing Oxycodone

Nashville Woman Admits Theft of $360,000 In Federal Grant Funds Intended To Aid Veterans

Tampa Woman Sentenced to More Than 5 Years in Prison for identity theft.

Gosh. I always thought women were more trustworthy than men. It just goes to show you that it’s always sumpthin’, huh?

Posted in VAOIG Watchdogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Aircraft over Southwest Asia (4/1/13)

Awesome DoD photo by Tech. Sgt. Christina M. Styer, U.S. Air Force

“A U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft prepares to receive fuel from a KC-10 Extender aircraft over Southwest Asia  April 1, 2013.  Both aircraft conducted missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.”

Beautiful!

Posted in From the footlocker | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ONLY IN AMERICA

images (3)

From the shallow end of the Mekong River, Jimbo brings us this one. We love lawyers when they are our own-bought and paid for. We hate other lawyers when they are employed against us as the VA is wont to do. Here’s a great law dog story guaranteed to warm your heart (unless you’re a rainmaker, of course).

This took place in Charlotte, North Carolina

 A lawyer purchased a box of 24 of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against, among other things, fire.

 Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost ‘in a series of small fires.

 The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.

 The lawyer sued – and WON! (Stay with me…)

 Delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company, in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable ‘fire’ and was obligated to pay the claim.

 Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars that perished in the ‘fires’.

 NOW FOR THE BEST PART…

 After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

THE TOMATO NURSERY

001

If Cupcake finds out I’m doing this in the back laundry room, I’m toast. If the countertop blows up from all the water, well, I may have to find new living arrangements. I guess I can blame VA for it because they won’t give me my ILP greenhouse.

The good news is she wanted me to grow fewer tomatoes this year. It appears I may have  succeeded. Last year we had 144 starts and I caught hell for it. This year it’s a paltry 117. The other good news is Sunnycrest nursery is buying all my extras so this is now a vocational project rather than an avocational one. In fact, we took 21 mammoth jackolantern pumpkin starts down there this morning. I think I’ll have them donate the proceeds to the Peninsula Veterans outfit locally here. I don’t want to embroil myself in a tax issue if my earnings endanger my Social Security payments. Like that’s going to happen.

The kicker is I (Cupcake)  planted chocolate somethingarother tomatoes. They’re reputed to taste “chocolatety”. Likewise the pineapple ones. This is going to be interesting. I’m not going to go out on the little limbs and ask her why we don’t just buy chocolate or pineapples. I would simply get the “look” and a long, drawn out briefing. Somewhere the words “men, neanderthal, box thinking, and the you have the tomato box out” would be inserted. Following that, exhortations to be daring and not so caught up in those “old, tired ways” would follow. It makes me shiver. I’m learning. In order to “accessorize the salad”, you need a palate of different colors. Apparently, tomatoes are the perfect tool for this.  I wonder how many other men on earth know this. In fact, I wonder how many men on earth even give a… I think I’ll just stop there.

imagesimages (1)images (2)

Posted in Food for the soul, VR&E | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

FACEWINNER

I found this on my social media organizer where I am instructed on what is the politically correct thing to think on any given day. Fortunately, this being America, I am free to move about the country. Michael Stevens earns the accolades for this one. I think it says it all.

527025_10151606298994047_722189459_n

Posted in VA BACKLOG | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rating epidemiologists

The Origins of AIDS

One of my recent frustrations has centered around the misleading statements of scientists who study blood-borne pathogens and work in U. S. institutions.  Epidemiologists in other countries seem more forthcoming about how global mass vaccination programs and other medical  interventions spread infectious diseases.

It’s hard not to form impressions of the quality of various research projects after reading dozens of abstracts and articles in PUBMED.  Many of them are signed by multiple authors so one can’t zero in on the exact contributions of each who signed off on an article.  But when there are only one or two creators, judgments are more easily made and potential allies identified.  Here is the informal rating system I’m applying to various intellectual products as I find them:

Brave truth-seeking epidemiologists:   Five stars

Careful but generally helpful epidemiologists:  Four stars  

Frightened epidemiologists who find subtle ways to promote unbiased science:  Three stars

Timid epidemiologists who make limited contributions:  Two stars.

Ambiguous epidemiologsts who are protectors of the status quo and make limited contributions.   One star

Epidemiologists who lie, hide and evade issues for money, to save their reputations or those they worked for (sometimes saintly reputations at that), or for other reasons.    NO stars

French Canadian Dr. Pepin, a physician, epidemiologist, and professor, is also an ethicist who admits to unsafe vaccination procedures when he worked in Africa.  He explains how and why this occurred in his amazing book, The Origins of Aids (2011).   HCV is an important part of Pepin’s medical storytelling.  I am grateful to the author for articulating how blood-borne pathogens such as HCV and HIV have been transmitted iatrogenically through different types of medical interventions and settings.  Pepin looks at the big picture (science, history, social) and one can learn how the best epidemiologists reason through problems.  Looking at circumstantial evidence and direct evidence are part of the necessary processes used. 

Many physicians think that they are qualified to opine on epidemiology without dual degrees.  Here are two examples:

Gutherie S. Birkhead M.D., has a master’s in public health and CDC experience.  He works for the State of New York.  He gives Pepin’s book a “thumbs up;” He’s not an epidemiologist but close enough so I rate him three stars for his book review in JAMA and five stars for his blog comment (2nd comment down) giving his strong support for the One and Only One Campaign in response to a USA Today article.

But as soon as Federal government money becomes a major influence (as in big salary, benefits and glory or research dollars) the waffling begins.

For example, this book review is written by CDC newly hired Kevin DeCock, M. D. from Belgium.  Like Birkhead, he calls the book a “tour de force” but this quote leads me to  believe that he was hired to defend the status quo.

“The evidence offered by Pepin for the iatrogenic hypothesis is probably better presented than ever before.  Nevertheless, the evidence is speculative because it is based on circumstantial and ecologic associations, such as those between earlier medical practices and trends in hepatitis C virus infection. Despite excessive speculation in parts of the book, such as that concerning the role of the trade in plasma from Haiti, this work is still a “tour de force” and deserves widespread recognition.”

De Cock likes the book but calls it “excellent but frustrating” in the first sentence; I have to give him in the one star.

There is a big difference between a 3000-word study on a subject and a research-dense book.  Unfortunately,  studies are cited more often than books and are very influential.  The more citations, the more influential.

Pepin’s work sets a gold standard for epidemiologists.    He earns five stars from me.  If you can get The Origin of Aids from your librarian or on your Kindle app, I think you’ll appreciate Pepin’s work, which is also deals with HCV, as much as I do.

Posted in Guest authors, HCV Risks (documented), Jetgun Claims evidence, Medical News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BVA–ROBERT DOES DC

Sometimes, in their haste to assassinate a Vet, the RO neglects to take the head shot and ensure the claimant is down permanently. Such is the case here. For lack of a word in the right place in 2002 and failure to mention certain things, VA ‘s Los Angeles Regional Office poked a rather large hole in their foot with a large calibre weapon.

45-inch-hole-plus-peripheral-trauma

When Robert came to me in 2010, he presented his problem. If you believe the VA, he inadvertently confided that he had injected and sniffed drugs while in service. There is no record of this or judicial punishments. Nevertheless, by admitting this, VA formulated a finding or holding that he had. Robert has been through more Interferon courses than anyone I’ve met. None of them were successful in eradicating the bug.  At one point in 1995, they had him injecting himself once a day. This tends to pickle the brain and Robert admits as much. He maintains he has never volunteered using illicit narcotics to the VA. I believe him. When I approached the VA with my claim, the C&P doctor was congenial and wanted to know how I thought I got it. The first word out of his mouth was drugs. I made sure he was aware that I did not endorse that theory.

So many Vets make this mistake and fail to correct it. Here, in the 2002 initial claim, he was unaware he’d been tarred and feathered with it because the VA examiner neglected to mention it. They, as I mentioned above, were so busy planning the ambush that they neglected to describe it in detail. In fact, the VA examiner neglected to mention anything whatsoever about drug abuse in the rationale for his denial in 2002. To add insult to injury, they took his nexus letter and started adding handwritten comments to it. Yep. Just like Phil Cushman. VA Examiner Doctors working overtime correcting other Doctors’ errors.

The denial was bogus but Robert didn’t know this. He was sick from all the drugs and trusted the bubbleheads that the government provided him with to represent him. When he came to me it was obvious he’d gotten the shaft. We put together a list of good risks which fortunately mirrored the ones he’s claimed in 2002- the usual-jetguns, dental and shared razors etc. One would think VA would just give this the once over again and heave it into the shredder room. They tried. They just underestimated Robert’s resolve.

Robert patiently followed my advice to appeal and we put it together carefully. We came up with a credible CUE defense based on a poorly altered nexus (the letter was typewritten on VISTA VHA- the additions were hand-written). We put forth the evidence of unsanitary hygiene in dental practices available here at the site. We piled it high with lots of things. Robert wisely put in for an advancement based on 38 CFR §20.900(c) on the docket as well.

The BVA looked at this tarbaby and realized the VA examiner had irreparably damaged the claim by omitting so much in 2002. They therefore had to repack the bearings with all the old drug stuff to refute Robert’s newer contentions that this was hogwash and merely words stuffed into his mouth. They then tore up Dr. Cecil’s nexus which hinged on no drugs being involved. Once they determined Robert had admitted using drugs, his protestation of innocence automatically provoked a finding that his credibility was shot. I have discussed this at length in my book. This did not bode well for the claim.

The BVA Veterans Law Judge, to his credit, could see the silt being stirred up and the hopelessness of gerrymandering a way out of this nexus business. He opted wisely for a new Independent Medical Opinion and it backfired on VA’s finest. The doctor actually used the benefit of the doubt to say that it was just as likely as not that the jetguns and poor dental hygiene practices in 1973 were the guilty party as any hanky panky with drugs-if indeed there had been any at all. Furthermore, Robert had obtained a tattoo in service but it had not been annotated at his separation physical. This weighed against his claim but really didn’t upset the applecart as it was not considered germane to the discussion. But remember, like an elephant, once a doctor hears something such as “tattoo in service”, his mind begins formulating that into the mix as well. It’s like a jury who overhears something and the judge instructs them to ignore the comment. Sorry Pandora’s out now. An independent doctor is liable to accept that a tattoo falls into the realm of non-medical and is a phenomenon a man can describe with his five senses.

What will grip you is the double IMO. The first just said it coulda been the jetguns or the dental with a side of bloody razor. Veterans Law Judge Martin felt he needed a tighter noose and sent it back to the Opiner in Chief. “What about the Imperial entanglements with the drugs, good Doctor?”

The doctor, nonplussed, added the rejoinder  “Yep. It could have been any one of those things…while he was serving in the military. The risks were all equal in that the chances of him getting it from intravenous drug use were just as equal to his getting it from the jetgun”. Therein lies the the win. No IMO previously has given a jetgun nearly this much weight versus a drug risk.

In the end,  the BVA judge was hung by the Colvin ruling. He would have dearly loved to choose an RO ARNP VA Examiner’s opinion as more probative, but instead, he foolishly sent out for Chinese dinner. Amazing. This is the first “jetgun” claim here to succeed based on that defense. I doubt it will be the last. Robert, by his own admission, is seriously impaired by what VA has done to him with Interferon again and again. Guinea Pig is too tame a description to describe poking someone day-in and day-out with rat poison. Multiply that by three or four courses of the bug juice and you are asking for some warped brain cells. Oh yeah…and the thyroid cancer.

The teaching moment, as always comes at the end. If you think you are incapable of accomplishing this task, think about how Robert approached it when he came to me. I was brutally honest and asked him if he had a sado-masochistic bent and a desire to be eviscerated by the VA. Remember he was already on a pension from VA. Why upset the status quo? He put his trust in me and I promptly said no dice. This is a DIY (do it yourself) site. I’ll provide advice but the claim is yours. He doggedly pursued it through the darkest hour when denied at the RO. He picked and poked at it all the way through and had a face to face with the Veterans Law Judge even though the fight or flight urge said “Run like hell”. In short, he did this with severe mental impairments and he did it well. In a word, he did it bravely. His military training served him well.He now awaits the LARO’s receipt of his C-file back from DC and a preliminary rating. Having tasted success, he’s going to try his hand at a few secondaries after the dust settles.

Of all the claims I’ve encountered, this was the one with the poorest of odds. I have an indomitable will and resist the urge to retreat. Throwing the gauntlet down is the signal to fight. Robert apparently felt the same way. He did condition his desire to fight based on whether I felt it had a prayer in hell. I didn’t lie nor did I tell him to start shopping for a new Ram pickup either. I merely said what I’ve said to all of you. One thing is for damn sure if you don’t file. You won’t win. The second adage most all know me for is “Win or Die”. I cannot begin to tell all of you how proud I am of Robert. When he emailed me last night and said ” I can’t be sure but I think I won”, I honestly couldn’t sleep. Apparently, neither could he. In sum, if this man can do it, any of you can. All I did was hold his hat and coat. He carried the water.

Here it is in all it’s splendor- a  nineteen page how-to on winning your HCV claim. Thank you for sharing this, Robert.  You are the very first Vet to give me wet-eye syndrome. That must be where the phrase “Read ’em and weep” came from.

2013-04-06 1526002013-04-06 151022_2 2013-04-06 151022_32013-04-06 151022_42013-04-06 151022_52013-04-06 151022_62013-04-06 151022_72013-04-06 151022_82013-04-06 151022_92013-04-06 151022_102013-04-06 151022_112013-04-06 151022_122013-04-06 151022_132013-04-06 151022_142013-04-06 151022_152013-04-06 151022_172013-04-06 151022_182013-04-06 151022_19

Pretty cool stuff, huh? In spite of acknowledging the use of drugs intranasally and intravenously, the medical doctor still came down on his side and said the jetguns and dental procedures “were an equal risk”. This is cutting edge precedence for HCVets. No IMOs to my knowledge have ever gone out on the little branches and held that the risks were coequal. Robert’s decision is truly unique in that respect.

images (1)

P.S. Robert is number #36. Also, Robert inadvertently followed my advice and got no less than three nexus’. The BVA supplied #4. Final tally was Robert 3, VA 1.

Posted in BvA HCV decisions, Jetgun BvA Decisions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

NPRC RECORDS–WHO GOT BURNED?

images

I received an email several days ago from a gal whose husband served from the early eighties for 4 years. They had filed for various diseases (yep-HCV, too) and got back an interesting note from their VSO. It appears their records were burned up in 1973 even though he was about 7 years old then. Amazing, isn’t it? Is this like VSRs being unable to find any mention of HCV in your records from 1970?  Or, better yet, opining that because the Hepatitis Australian Antigens  (HAA)test in 1972 was positive, that proved you had acute Hepatitis A that resolved spontaneously?

When confronted with the dichotomy of how records produced 14 years after the fire could have been consumed in it, the service officer said he’d “have to look into it”. I’m sure they’ll have a good answer for her. She and I are awaiting that one.

Here’s the definitive info as near as NPRC is willing to admit. The fire consumed the following:

  • 80% loss to records of U.S. Army personnel discharged November 1, 1912, to January 1, 1960 

  • 75% loss to records of U.S. Air Force personnel discharged September 25, 1947, to January 1, 1964, with names alphabetically after Hubbard, James E. 

  • Some U.S. Army Reserve personnel who performed their initial active duty for training in the late 1950s but who received final discharge as late as 1964.

None of the records that were destroyed in the fire had duplicate copies made, nor had they been copied to microfilm. No index of these records was made prior to the fire, and millions of records were on loan to the Veterans Administration at the time of the fire. This made it difficult to precisely determine which records were lost,

Since the VA can’t find their own ass with a sensitive methane detector, I’m sure they have never returned any records “on loan” back to the NPRC. Of note here, remember there are two other very large sources of information stored at the NPRC which they are loathe to admit exist. First, all in-patient hospital records from military hospitals are not associated with your Service Treatment Records (STRs) nor are you military Service records which would include assignments, medals, rank and the like. Three sets of files stored separately and filed by hospital chronologically. In addition, some medical records from military hospital still languish in basements and other storage areas at those hospitals and were never forwarded to St. Louis.

And then there are the real, off-road civilian hospitals in Southeast Asia where Air America and USAID set up in remote locations. Many service personnel inadvertently left their records behind mistakenly assuming our government would dutifully retrieve them. Those are gone forever much like the records damaged by water and fire in St. Louis.

The NPRC can access quite of bit of info for your claims if you are anally specific about asking them to. Sometimes you have to go back two or three times to find it or get them to perform a true search. The truth is out there except for the the few mentioned above. Out of curiosity, I wonder if they’ll ever bother to scan all these records into an electronic database or just set another fire and be done with it. Here’s a NARA link that also describes it well.

Posted in Nexus Information | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments