Draft bill: “Caring for our Heroes in the 21st Century Act”


News from Frank (VT) to consider: 

Cathy_McMorris_Rodgers,_Official_Portrait,_112th_Congress

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers Image: Wikipedia

Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA-05) is working on a bill that contains many VA healthcare restructuring proposals.  She wants feedback on the 58-page discussion draft (LINK).

“With this draft legislation, my goal is for veterans to have the ability to choose what health care plan best fits their individual needs,” McMorris Rodgers said in the statement. “This proposal should serve as the starting point for putting veterans in charge of their health care.”  (LINK)

One good idea is to allow vets to buy into the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (Section 401). But this could just be a carrot because it plays into our fears (realistic or not). Why not just separate this provision as a standalone law?

Some of the ideas are radical and seem suspicious.  For example, a proposal to create a VetChoice Care Program with an open enrollment period, linked to priority groups, premiums, premium supports, health savings accounts, and other complicated ideas.

Newspaper articles make these proposals sound good but hold on…

The DAV, responding to Sen. McCain’s criticism of VSOs about resistance to some non-VA care proposals gives one pause:

“What we are against is unrealistic proposals that promise unlimited choice, which in itself is unsustainable, and in reality could force millions of veterans to lose the option to use VA health care, which could ultimately shift the financial cost of care onto every veteran.”

I’d like to see analysis from the Veteran Service Organizations on this discussion draft.  I would love to see an end of the dysfunctional, wasteful system veterans endure now but I think some of these privatization ideas are not in the best interest of veterans.

carrot-cake-226772_1280

Carrots in cake is good; carrots as bribes, are bad. Image: PD Pixabay

 

This entry was posted in All about Veterans, Food for thought, Future Veterans, General Messages, Guest authors, Medicare for VETS, non-va care, Uncategorized, VA Health Care, VSOs and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Draft bill: “Caring for our Heroes in the 21st Century Act”

  1. Thank you for posting this information Kiedove.

    At least the Congresswoman is asking for feedback–something many Representatives and Senators do not do. If she (and her staff) read all the responses and take them seriously, then so much the better.

    Privatization sounds great on paper, but in reality what veterans will likely receive is typical “managed care” insurance. Instead of the VA telling you what’s allowed, it will be a group of business people whose motive is profit, telling you what’s allowed and which doctors you can see. (Vets will definitely not be able to “see any doctor they want” as some would have you believe).

    One-third of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employees are veterans, and many of the non-veteran employees like working at VA because helping veterans is very important to them. What do you think the composition of the private managed care insurance companies will be, i.e., what percentage will be veterans? What percentage genuinely care and are highly motivated to help veterans? I bet the percentages will be much lower than the VHA.

    One way to look at it is to ask, Who should the middle man be? Right now it is a big government bureaucracy, albeit one that employs many veterans and those committed to helping vets. Or we could switch to privatization and the middleman will be for-profit companies.

    Also keep in mind that veterans currently have the ability to influence policy and procedures directly (by contacting their Representative and Senator), and via veterans service organizations. With privatization, veterans influence will diminish because Congress has limited power with private companies, i.e., they have less influence with a diverse group of for-profit business entities than they do with a federal agency.

    Mark

    • Kiedove says:

      If you have the time, why not develop these ideas and send an article to Alex to post? Your opinions are valuable to readers here.

    • Mark.
      I can see you are against Vets using private medical care. Your response regarding the “profit motive” of “a group of business people” is based on an assumption that there is no “profit motive” of VA employees. This assumption is incorrect. This entire problem is caused by the profit motive of VA employee execs who devised schemes to increase their bonuses (profits) by manipulating wait times to make it appear they are reducing wait times for Vets instead of actually doing so.
      VA employees hardly check their profit motive and self interests at the door when they become an employee, at least some of which were in the “group of business people” who “sought profits” prior to becoming an employee at VA.
      Indeed, the profit motive is alive and well in both VA employees, and in insurance companies who may profit from some sort of privatization of health care, as do contractors for products consumed by VA. There is no less profit motive of VA employees, than of insurance companies. In fact, VA employees who want bonuses often do it at Veterans expense, such as the travel time/travel pay manipulations which led to Allison Hickeys resignation.
      By basing decisions on a false assumption, you often get an undesired result. I dont see any downside to allowing Vets to choose whether to use VA care or some type of private health care paid for by VA. The Vet can/will chose the path which provides the best care for him/her, regardless if its an insurance company who profits or a VA “group of employees” who get a bonus for “improving Vets care”.
      By allowing capitalism to work by not forcing Vets into substandard health care, a result could easily be that VA employees and execs see that to keep their jobs, they need to improve care for Vets or else the VA will ultimately cut back on the number of employees. I completely understand the union position to “protect jobs”, but protecting jobs of employees who provide substandard care does not serve Veterans.
      Rodney Dangerfield once opined that congress should be put “on commission”, so that when the country has a deficit, congressmen dont get paid.
      Giving Veterans a “choice” of health care options, similar to what VA employees have, will force VA med centers to improve their standard of care or lose market share to private health providers.
      If the VA management can not provide timely, quality health care for Vets, they should be “ran out of business” just like any poorly managed business. That is, there job should not be “protected” by the government insistence that Vets use the VA substandard health care. Allowing Vets a choice, is the ultimate accountability, where Vets chose with their money who bests serves their health care needs.
      The system of private care is working far, far better than VA managed care, in no small part because Veterans do not have a choice and must go to the VA substandard health care window for their medical care. This competition would benefit Vets, just like the phone service competition drove down phone rates. Competition mostly eliminated the “long distance call” premium in phone service. We now have a choice of phone providers and are not forced to buy from an inferior company who has some monopoly with the government agencies.
      This will force VA to improve their standard of care or suffer cutbacks. Its much needed.

  2. joeaveragevet says:

    I really dont like the DAV speaking for me. Their history is not all that favorable. For example they opposed Veterans getting an attorney. Now, they apparently oppose Veterans choosing whether to have VA health care or from the private sector. This crapola about Vets losing health care altogether is just that. Its pure speculation, with no bases in fact. It MAY force VAMC’s to “clean up their act” so that Veteran’s WANT to go to the VA, instead of because we HAVE to go to the VA. Over and over again, the VA has proven they are incapable of managing Vets health care and benefits, with both in shambles with way too long of waits for both. The DAV posits that we maintain status quo, which is unacceptable. The VA has the same solution to all problems: They want more money. Each time, the VA squanders the money, like they did on Veterans choice, where the money went to cost over runs and very little found its way to Veterans health care.
    I am upset that DAV wants to maintain the status quo, where Veterans wait in long lines for health care AND for benefits. I have come to the realization that the VSO’s and VA are more interested in their own employees and jobs, than they are in serving Veterans. Maintaining status quo at the DAV means that the head honchos can continue to earn their 350 grand a year, while Vets continue to become homeless waiting in endless lines for benefits, or, as in the past, they die waiting for health care. Of course, the DAV offers no alternatives, just satus quo. The status quo is unacceptable.

    • Kiedove says:

      True. The status quo is a disgrace. Top VSO salaries are disgusting. But like it or not, the major VSO’s are in Washington and they give testimony at hearings. So they are speaking for veterans. Unless you communicate your views with your senator or representative, and they are active on the various committees, who else is there to speak for veterans? Well, the case can be made that journalists/media can help the voices of veterans be heard. But the younger ones know little about Vietnam, AO, jet injectors, or even have a relative who has ever served in the military. So they are very limited in knowledge since the draft ended.
      Heck, if you look at this primary season when say, there were only 2 opponents on each side, none of them have any military service histories. I think George H. W. Bush was the last president who did and that was ’89 to ’93. That’s a long time ago but he understands what war is all about. No need to resort to fakery. His role in WWII was admirable for such a young man.

    • Ron says:

      Did anyone ever read, or hear of the book “Confessions of Congressman X?” I get the feeling that this congresswoman is just the same as the man or woman that is in the book.

      Thirty six years ago I was on active duty in the US Marine Coprs serving at a Navy Hospital as a medical boards counsellor. I was summarily removed from the job after helping five Marines and Sailors get a one hundred percent rating for their service related illnesses and injuries. There were also four officers that I termed “zeros” that were “know it alls” that knew more in their own primitive primordial minds than I did who had been trained for the job. In other words, the Department of the Navy cared more for the zeros than for the enlisted men. So why in an election year does this woman care more about us than last year you may ask? Just like in the above mentioned book she cares about her own job more than us Vets.

  3. john king says:

    I will be dead and in my VA grave before there are essential changes to the VA. I get tired of this Hero crap. Most guys in Vietnam were just counting days and trying to survive the war. Hero types usually died. They in Nam just like other wars were heroic but not hero types except Audy Murphy maybe.

  4. M.S. Frank says:

    VA restructuring proposals are essentially wishes. The VA is the mother of all genies. Guess what happens next.

    • Kiedove says:

      Well, some readers here have advanced the idea of having Medicare handle payments–which has merit. Medicare has two basic charges, “extra help” with reduced premiums for low-income seniors and regular premiums.

      But throw in the VA’s priority schemes and you’ve got a mess. The priority schemes are self-defeating because they deny services to thousands of “better off” vets, vets who might have private employer insurance, which they could bill for income

      Congress does not allow veterans to buy a ACA exchange policy AND be enrolled in VA. How stupid and insulting. Simplifying policies, streamlining methods, would save time and money. But no, the VA hires private contractors like Healthnet to handle the Choice program, and it’s a horror show.

      The veterans’ choice reform movement is good. It needs to be expanded but I for one am very uncomfortable with the thought of turning it into a program whereby it becomes like a HMO, opting-in to have to pay premiums–unless service-connected–based on their income. I don’t see how that is going to improve the VHA’s quality of care.

      We should really stay informed about what they are cooking up in DC for vets–and probably pay attention to the VSOs who are clearly wary for good reason.

      • Very well said Keidove. I agree with your analysis.

        Here are two articles that explain some essential power dynamics related to veterans healthcare and benefits:

        Iron triangle (US politics) – Wikipedia article that provides a succinct introduction to the concept. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_triangle_(US_politics)

        Beyond the Iron Triangle: Implications for the Veterans Health Administration in an Uncertain Policy Environment by Stephen K. Trynosky | http://www.ptsdexams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Beyond-the-Iron-Triangle.pdf

        The implication for individual veterans is that to influence change, you need to persuade one or more veterans service organizations to support the changes you believe will most help veterans.

        To put it more crudely, venting on message boards might feel good, but it’s unlikely to change anything.

        • Kiedove says:

          Thanks for posting the Iron Triangle information. I will read Trynosky’s paper tonight and give it some thought.
          Misc. meanderings:

          How does change happen? When things become intolerable for masses of the “have-nots” they will eventually vent, complain, and use either violent or peaceful methods to get at least some of the things they need via the laws of their lands–or flee.

          It is appalling that American women were not allowed to vote until the 19th amendment was ratified in 1920–a case of motivated individual women being too peaceful perhaps?

          Sander’s trip to the Vatican to speak about a moral economy reminded me of Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin, and the Catholic Worker Movement. They didn’t ask for permission from a bishop or cardinal to feed the unemployed in the Bowery in 1933; they just did it based on their understanding of Christ’s teaching on poverty. The Torah offers a tremendous guidance on how to create a moral economy. Or Ghandi; Or Tolstoy. Mother Theresa told people to not come to Calcutta; instead, find the poor and lonely in their own backyards.

          The VA is an economic system that lacks moral leadership–and yet, much good gets done anyway by individuals one-on-one. Gov. administrations don’t follow U.S. laws–for example, the Buy American Act of 1933. The VA buys foreign goods over American products even though they can easily source them here. I’m surprised that Trump and Sanders, who are so critical of our trade policies, haven’t mentioned this disaster–one so easy to enforce.
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy_American_Act

      • Sherry says:

        I agree completely. I have a hard time understanding their good intentions for our Vets but, yes there is always a BUT when screwing a good thing; lol! BUT, with everything they come up with always has the clause(s) that eliminate the use of the good idea. Something is wrong with a system that feels drugs are the answer for everything or the system that puts more time into setting the rules then implementing it smoothly. It sure sounds to me as though it’s a wash my hands and move you Vets on. No responsibility regarding the healthcare you receive BUT man, thanks for putting your life at stake for our Country. A quick note regarding the “Choice Program”. My husband got darn lucky in using this program, if it wasn’t for a young Vet working the program my husband never would have had the opportunity to have his surgery which has allowed him to urinate on his own again. This young Vet bypassed a small rule that made a huge medical relief for my husband who went nearly a year on meds that did nothing. He would have been left on the meds with no change until he passes. Think about that for one minute, this one young Vet made a decision on behalf of another Vet that has changed his existence, who now sees a viable reason to get up in the morning. You pass this kind of brother relationship on and I guarantee you the private medical field will in no way take care of a Vet like this.

        • Kiedove says:

          I think you are indeed lucky because even though the VA has broad authority to apply rules and regs to help vets, they don’t often seem to. Are you still able to use the Choice program or was it just for one course of treatment?

  5. Ramon Laguna says:

    No Good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s