| I am including this Court decision for Vets to review. Even though it’s a Single Judge disposition, it clearly illustrates what a panel would find as well. The Veteran is representing himself before the Court, which I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy. Even though they handle him with kid gloves and bend over backwards to do things for him they wouldn’t even consider for a represented Vet, the outcome is still the same. Wayne C. Theofrastou, a former member of the U.S. Coast Guard, is appealing a denial of his motion for Clear and Unmistakable Error in a January 2007 Board decision. As the Moving party in the suit, he can appeal this to the Court. So, let’s see what went so horribly wrong here. The Waynester lost this at the R.O. way back in 2005 He appealed to the Board and lost there in Jan. of 2007. He then let it slide with no appeal to the Court. He might have gotten traction there for a remand due to some obscure error. The raw facts are that he was chasing a jetgun claim with a fistful of internet articles and a tall order for VA to come up with the make and model of the jetgun(s) used on him in Basic training, the types and quantities of the shots he received in Basic, and the lot number of the Gamma Globulin he was administered for hepatitis protection. Yes, you read that right. Had he appealed in 07, as I said, he might have fought to a draw and gotten something. He didn’t. So he filed for the CUE which was the only way he could revisit the unappealed BVA decision. Here is where he stubbed his toe. CUE is an utter bitch to prove even when VA has done something wrong. The rules say you have to use the law as it was written in 2007, the error had to be dispositive, and of such magnitude as to alter the ruling against the Vet. The actual facts cannot be reexamined and failure to assist the Vet does not constitute CUE. You can only argue the same facts at the Court on appeal. You are not allowed to keep thinking up new reasons for a do over. Waynemeister, being pro se, was blithely unaware of these constraints and threw in some new gripes when he arrived up at the Big House on Indiana Ave. Seems he felt the benefit of the doubt was not considered by the Board (not allowed in CUE) and that the Board failed to consider documents and articles submitted in support of his claim (not mentioned in 09 BVA CUE appeal). The Court, being a cultured, soft-spoken institution, was polite in pointing out these errors to the Waynedude. They were very gracious and gave him the standard “Y’all come back now, heyuh?” just as soon as he refiled these new allegations of CUE and they were properly heard and denied before the Board-and no sooner. When a Vet sets out to defend himself, he has many assets at his disposal. He has websites devoted to helping Vets he can visit. He can even obtain a lot of free advice from well wishers at these interactive sites, regardless of their qualifications. He has the right to defend himself and apparently, he also has the right to remain stupid. This he does with abandon. He has just received a rude awakening and a large dose of jurisprudence for his efforts. In the meantime, we fellow claimants find ourselves in the waiting room. Vets have a marvelous judicial system that accords them many rights. It’s slower than the seven year itch, but it has myriad protections. There is nothing preventing Mr. Theofrastou from tying up the R.O. and the Board for years pursuing the impossible. VA will dutifully go through the motions and try to accommodate his requests. However, the requests should have to be reasonable. No one would expect the military to keep the info he demands, so his taking umbrage with failure to assist is misguided. Because he represents himself, there is no legal entity to guide him or dissuade him from this frivolous filing and the ensuing cost of time and judicial assets squandered on it. It’s selfish and myopic. One judge each from the two Courts, a minimum of 12 associate counsels at the Board and probably as many from the Court have labored on and off for several years so that Mr. Theofrastou could have his day in Court. You’re welcome, Wayne. Deserving disabled Vets everywhere salute you and your misguided pursuit of justice. Now be a peach and go home. The sad fact is he can start over on this same CUE project and bring up the two other items he forgot to include in the 09 CUE filing. This will consume even more assets and again hold up BVA appeals for other, more deserving Vets. It’s the hand we are dealt, but you will excuse me if the desire to throttle Wayne seems uppermost in my mind. Anger management training would come in handy right now.
Let us now travel to Wayne’s World. Go here: http://search.uscourts.cavc.gov/ . Erase [Query} and type in 09-4156 and hit search Click on the blue word “download ” in the upper left corner in between “view” and “details” to view normally. |


-
Join 568 other subscribers
Bloggers
-
asknod
Bethanie Spangenberg
-
kcraveiro
-
robinhoodesqvetsatty
-
Wesley McCauley
-
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
Blogs by Subject
- 100% ratings (14)
- 1151 claims (9)
- 1154(b) combat presumptions (19)
- 2013 Hugfest Magnet Indiana (15)
- 2015 Hugfest Gig Harbor Wash (5)
- 3.156(c) (23)
- 38 CFR § 3.156(b) (6)
- 4th of July (12)
- Agent Orange (74)
- Aid and Attendance (50)
- All about Veterans (526)
- AMC or ARC (5)
- AO (113)
- Appeals Modernization Act (50)
- Approved Veterans Charities (2)
- Army Medical Manual (3)
- ASKNOD BOOK (55)
- §3.156(c) claims (3)
- Barry Bumps in SMC (5)
- Blood info (14)
- Blue Water Navy (14)
- BvA and VARO CUE DECISIONS (10)
- BvA Decisions (163)
- BvA HCV decisions (366)
- BVA Hearings (10)
- BVA Purplebook (5)
- BVA records tampering (3)
- BVA Referrals (4)
- BVA VLJ RECUSALS (1)
- C&P exams (42)
- C-Files and RBAs (17)
- CAFC Rulings (8)
- Camp Lejeune poisoning (24)
- CAvC HCV Ruling (55)
- CAVC Knowledge (122)
- CAVC ruling (91)
- CAVC/COVA Decision (44)
- Claims sharks (4)
- CLE -Continuing Legal Education (1)
- Combat Presumption (4)
- Community Care Network (3)
- Complaints Department (154)
- Congressional HCV info (8)
- Congressional Influence (20)
- Corona pandemic (22)
- Corona virus (19)
- CUE (70)
- DBQs (2)
- De Novo Review (2)
- Dependency allowance (1)
- Diagnostic Codes (DCs) (3)
- DIC (10)
- DM II (21)
- DRO and BVA Hearings (20)
- Duty to Assist (22)
- EAJA (7)
- Earlier Effective dates (42)
- Electronic Filing of Evidence (8)
- Equitable Estoppel (4)
- Equitable tolling (15)
- Exposed Veteran Radio Show (39)
- Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus (66)
- Extraschedular consideration (1)
- FACE HUMOR (78)
- Fed. Cir. & Supreme Ct. (53)
- Fiduciary (1)
- Food for the soul (177)
- Food for thought (183)
- Frivolous Filings (45)
- From the footlocker (79)
- Future Veterans (73)
- General Messages (448)
- Guest authors (443)
- Gulf War Issues (86)
- Guns (1)
- HBV (6)
- HCV Epidemiology (27)
- HCV Health (308)
- HCV Risks (documented) (186)
- hepatitis (21)
- hepatitis A (HAV) (2)
- Higher Level of Review (HLR) (11)
- HISA Grants (2)
- History (14)
- HOMELESS VETERANS (27)
- How to Qualify for VA SMC (13)
- Humor (556)
- IMOs/IMEs (39)
- Implicit denial (7)
- Important CAVC/COVA Ruling (114)
- Independent Living Program (131)
- Independent Medical Opinions (23)
- Inferred claims (14)
- Informal Claims (20)
- Inspirational Veterans (115)
- Interferon claims (17)
- Introduction-Read these first (34)
- Jetgun BvA Decisions (111)
- Jetgun Claims evidence (100)
- Jetgun Manual (10)
- KP Veterans (321)
- Labor Day (2)
- Lawyering Up (61)
- Lay testimony (13)
- Legacy Claims (8)
- Legislation (9)
- LOD and willful misconduct (9)
- Loss of Use (1)
- LZ Cork (12)
- M-21 info (13)
- medical injections (23)
- Medical News (290)
- Medicare for VETS (13)
- Memorial Day (19)
- Milestones (44)
- Military Madness (22)
- MST (14)
- NEW BOOK (15)
- New disability calculator widget (1)
- Nexus Information (192)
- non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (1)
- non-va care (26)
- NPRC 1973 Fire (6)
- Obtaining a C-file (6)
- OIG Entertainment (7)
- OSA (3)
- PACT ACT (4)
- PCAFC (3)
- Pickles (11)
- polls (19)
- Porphyria Cutanea Tarda (25)
- Presumption of Regularity (36)
- Presumption of Soundness (6)
- Proof of Mailing (8)
- PTSD (137)
- Public Service Announcements (7)
- R1/R2 (22)
- Reductions in rating (12)
- Remanded claims (16)
- research (64)
- SC For Cause of Death (6)
- Service dogs (2)
- SHREDDERGATE (13)
- SMC (92)
- SMC Bedridden (1)
- SMC School (3)
- SOCs and SSOCs (10)
- Sofosbuvir (33)
- Space Force (1)
- Special Monthly Compensation (26)
- Stardust Radio (18)
- Stolen Valor (11)
- suicide (2)
- TBI (28)
- TDIU (25)
- Thailand AO presumptive path (14)
- Thanksgiving and war (8)
- The Vietnam Wall (5)
- Tips and Tricks (512)
- transfusions and hepatitis (7)
- Tunnel to Towers (1)
- Uncategorized (349)
- Urgent Care Benefit (2)
- VA Agents (345)
- VA AMA appeals knowledge (13)
- VA Attorneys (114)
- VA BACKLOG (166)
- VA Bonuses (14)
- VA Caregivers Act (3)
- VA Claims Sharks (4)
- VA Conspiracies (26)
- VA FTCA Claims (3)
- VA Health Care (132)
- VA Medical Mysteries Explained (151)
- VA Motions for Reconsideration (8)
- vA news (422)
- VA RAMP (7)
- VA Representative Training (5)
- VA Secretaries (23)
- VA security Breaches (6)
- VA special monthly compensation (17)
- VA statistics (33)
- VA suspense dates (10)
- VA TBI (10)
- VA+ Social Security (2)
- VAMC Scheduling Coverup (54)
- VAOIG Watchdogs (43)
- vARO Decisions (72)
- VARO Misfeasance (26)
- VBMS (25)
- VBMS Tricks (108)
- Veterans arts (1)
- Veterans Charity concerns (10)
- Veterans Choice card (12)
- Veterans Day (27)
- Veterans Law (513)
- Vets Claims Advisory Group (VCAG) (1)
- Viet Nam Wall (1)
- Vietnam Disease Issues (178)
- Vietnam War history (170)
- VR&E (63)
- VSOs (55)
- Waiver of Review in the First Instance (5)
- Women Vets (10)
Meta
There is another post on this subject prompted by a communication from Mr. Theofrastou. Please be sure to read it as well. I t has valuable insight on this decision