Finally, a truthful answer to a vexing question. We know vA is error prone. All we are arguing these days is just how much so. The va is in deep denial and maintains that just maybe it’s 14% of the time. The BVA says 30% for sure and maybe more. The vA has admitted to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that it is at least 60%.
So Vets will love this one.
In a deposition related to a federal discrimination complaint filed by Fox, the then-head of the Oakland VA regional office where she worked, Lynn Flint, said that “it didn’t matter if the decision (to deny Roundtree’s claim) was right or wrong.”
In proceedings related to Fox’s wrongful-termination suit, Flint and Fox’s supervisor, Kim Yarbrough, argued that Fox had exceeded her authority by advocating for additional review of Roundtree’s case, lowering her productivity to unacceptable levels.
If Roundtree disagreed with the denial, Yarbrough said, he could always appeal.
Pretty ugly, huh? We’re the vA. We don’t need no stinkin’ badges.
BADGES?
WE DON’T NEED NO
STINKIN’ BADGES
P.S. Here’s a good link to youtube on this


Suspicions, accusations, and allegations all confirmed. Oh wait… bu..bu..but I’m sure most of those errors were in favor of the Vet, right? Uhhhhhh HUH.
Is anybody listening? Being comfortably numb is business as usual for the vA and those they serve. Exposure like this does them no harm. 4 more years. Is anybody listening?