FROM FORT FUMBLE
IN RENO
The last laugh has to be on Mr. Cronk and Dr. Snood. This is what happens when you set your febrile mind free to extrapolate all the myriad ways you can use pot and hash. Of course, IVDU immediately comes to mind and thus is born a drug addict from an occasional toker. Here, it backfired as the Vet is a credible witness and didn’t prevaricate. His story never waivered one bit and VA was forced to admit-through lack of evidence- that this ever happened. VA’s “fig newton” offense is thus unmasked and the Vet wins.
The Veteran is competent to report his drug history. Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007). Moreover, the Veteran is credible in his reports. The record reflects no clear first person statement that he used IV drugs. Where that allegation is made, it is done second hand, where another party has interpreted either a statement or a record. The Veteran has offered a reasonable explanation of the confusion, and the fact that only one doctor has specified use of IV drugs raises serious doubts as to the accuracy of the allegation. While the Veteran has used drugs in the past, such is limited to the smoking of marijuana and hash; there is no credible and competent evidence of intravenous or intranasal (or any other) use of other drugs such as cocaine or heroin.
A good win just wouldn’t be complete without our erstwhile Doctor friend:
Dr. B. Cecil, associated with a hepatitis C treatment center, reviewed the Veteran's service records and current treatment records, and opined that the currently diagnosed hepatitis C and associated liver damage was related to service. He noted that the Veteran had "no history of drug abuse or transfusion," and felt that the extent of current liver disease was "very suggestive" of a 1979 infection. Dr. Cecil also noted additional risk factors, including air gun injections, shared razors, and blood exposure during football games. http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files4/1132255.txtE.I. Dupont Nemours- when you care enough to serve the very best.

