Here’s a decision that illustrates how CUE works. Keeping in mind that there are three ingredients needed to produce CUE, and that a manifestly different outcome would have ensued, read about Mr. John P. Bouton’s travails with VA Secretary James B. Peake.
http://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/bouton-1494.pdf
Isn’t it entertaining how the Judges are polite as pie ,but manage to make the BVA judge look like a complete boob and the RO “ratings expert” appear about as intelligent as a sunflower? This is a primary example of how flawed the lower echelons of VA justice are (or can be) and why it is imperative to see your claim through to the end. Oftimes, justice is delayed, but not denied in this system. If your facts and the record support it, you will win. Assuming, of course, there are no intercurrent causes that precipitated the injury/disease.

The cue is a process against varo for having deniedy compensation when in the event, entitlement. can be shown through evidence that Kaven Jay Bowen (kjb) could be entitled to a psy or psy cond by the stateue of the the governing law. And the fact proves that in July 10, 1980, 4. days from discharge, and through the signature of the D
D 2807, “Report of Medical. History” did manifest this cond and approved for discharge, and sent to varo Muskogee, Oklahoma where this psy cond was STOLEN from him and remained deinied and silent. Now it can be proven through this communications that kjb was released with. a DD 214 (short form) provided no mention of the psy cond, no mental illness, and no summary of the tup
e of discharge (honorable or not honorable), hidden until kjb realized this and he himself went to an out of town to a civilian psy. Clinic were was diagnosed with a mental illness after 1 hour of taking to the psychologist Dr. Hellen Snow. (Diagnosis is in the c-file) who realized this error and entitled him to SSD.
Kaven Jay Bowen. 41-66-2059. US Navy